this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
549 points (98.1% liked)

News

23259 readers
3379 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Comrade Willy

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 127 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Prox@lemmy.world 96 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm still unironically on Team Orca here. Get sunk, scrubs.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 62 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Last I heard, they're bored and rudders are fun to play with.

We need to give them some orca proof toys.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 98 points 3 months ago (3 children)

orca sinks yacht, we need to give them alternatives

Nah, I'm cool with them having the yachts

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 57 points 3 months ago

I'm not. It's only a matter of time before some rich asshole starts shooting at the whales, dropping sticks of dynamite or some equivalent callous and heartless thing. I don't give two shits about the rich fucks, but I am highly concerned about the consequences to the whales. Humans, as a species, have no chill.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You're thinking Bezos yachts, these are $50-200$k boats people use as homes to see the world, not rich people. The word yacht doesn't mean wealth, it's just not a common mode of transportation.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago (8 children)

The word yacht doesn’t mean wealth,

Yes, yes it does. It doesn't mean 'billionaire,' but these aren't subsistence fishermen we're talking about here.

It was a $128,000 yacht. If you don't think people who can afford such a yacht are rich, you are one privileged person.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

It was a $128,000 yacht. If you don’t think people who can afford such a yacht are rich, you are one privileged person.

You'd be surprised how many people own a $128,000 yacht INSTEAD of a more-than-$128,000 house.

(Of course, there are even more people who live aboard full-time on much-less-than-$128,000 yachts. For example, Sailing Uma probably have a bunch of money now 'cause they're relatively successful Youtubers, but they started out spending only about $10k total (purchase + initial refit costs) for their 50-year-old, 36-foot boat. There's an entire subculture of people doing basically nautical #vanlife, and they aren't any richer than the homeless-by-conventional-standards people doing it on land.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

TBH might have been a bunch of middle class retirees who sold the family home up in England for like 800k, bought something smaller for two to live in in Spain, and a small sailing boat. I don't think about those people as "rich".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (10 children)

You’re literally attacking middle class people for having a small yacht.

Your concept of wealthy is really skewed.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Well, a yacht is just a class of vessel. I think a lot of people are confusing them with LUXURY yachts which are way too big to be sunk by orchas.

Here's one for sale, $59,000. I could actually buy this, I mean, yeah, it's from freakin' 1984... but still.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sudo@lemmy.today 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

These scientists say they don't intend to sink the boats but they're definitely doing it on porpoise.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 29 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Just wait until Orcas get opposable flippers.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Yes Mr Sha, last name Moo, could you please sign on the dotted line? Next time you should think twice about swimming drunk.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] madjo@feddit.nl 24 points 3 months ago

I, for one, welcome our new orca overlords!

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because they know that if they kill anyone rich enough to afford a boat that some jackass will kill them back. So they keep it to property damage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 19 points 3 months ago

Answer: because they are fucking based

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Nature is healing.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Did they eat the rich? 🤑 Otherwise the plan is going swimmingly.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think the answer to this question is in their name tbh. Should have named them Panda Whales instead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 months ago

Another article...

https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/orcas-sink-yacht-in-strait-of-gibraltar

This one has useful comments, like...

Rudders certainly look like a fin...best way to disable prey is to maim a fin. The orcas have learned power vessels are of sterner stuff.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I wonder how practical it'd be to have an underwater sound emitter to repel one. The use of sonar gets sometimes criticized for its impact on whales. You'd think that you could take advantage of that.

kagis

Probably not powerful enough. Looks like military sonar pulls down a lot of power:

https://www.quora.com/How-do-submarines-surface-ships-produce-such-loud-active-sonar-sound-emissions-from-their-transducers

The first ship I was on used a sonar system from the ‘60s. The system used the maximum amount of power, just short of causing the transducer (an underwater combination speaker and microphone) array to cavitate (boil the water). As you go deeper, it takes more power to cavitate, so submarine sonars were even more powerful (but seldom used, to keep from advertising their location). Our system used 288,000 watts (A powerful home stereo may use 250 watts, so this is like 1000 home stereos all going at the same time!) When the power supply for the amplifiers malfunctioned, it often erupted fireballs across the room (Our Division Officer was so frightened, after seeing one, that he refused to enter the room, or even come down the stairs to the room’s door!). In addition, besides the raw power, the signal can be electronically focused to go in a single direction, much like the powerful spotlights used for advertising (car dealerships, for example). This makes the signal strong enough, that you can bounce it off the bottom of the ocean and detect a submarine more than 40 miles away.

The sound is so loud, that you can hear it IN THE AIR while near a pier, when the ship was over 1,000 feet away (several city blocks). For a nearby diver in the water, it would extremely painful. In Vietnam, the ships in-port would run their sonars 24 hours a day, to keep enemy divers away from the ships.

Inside the ship, you could hear it, no matter where you were below decks, even in noisy places. Most of the crew hated it. Sometimes, we (the sonarmen) would light-off the system, with the most powerful beam pointed at the rest of the ship, at 6:00 AM for Reveille (“Damned %&$ sonarmen! *%#$%^%$!!!”).

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I think we should use AI to decifer their language and send them messages saying, "Chill bro! I'm just passing through." We'll probably get a response going something like, "You in the wrong neighborhood boy!"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bunkyprewster@startrek.website 10 points 3 months ago

These scientists have never heard that "revenge is a dish best served cold".

[–] USSEthernet@startrek.website 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The article is about orcas, but that video at the top is not an orca and just happened to sink a small fishing boat while it was feeding. Pretty sure that incident was an accident and the whale wasn't trying to sink it, it was just breaching and eating.

load more comments
view more: next ›