this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
40 points (83.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35726 readers
1342 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This question popped into my head after an ADHD moment of deconstructing the concept that humans willingly drink cow milk on an industrial scale. Would you drink milk if it was human women pumping the milk themselves?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago (4 children)

One thing I've heard mentioned is that the vegan restriction on animal milk is actually about consent, which humans can give (especially when paid), so human milk can be vegan. That opens up the possibility of vegan cheese, butter, etc. but as true dairy products. Seems like an untapped niche to me.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The internet has taught me that human breast milk doesn't make good cheese. Something about the protein content. Either too high or not high enough.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Iirc it's not enough. Human milk is pretty lean on the spectrum of fat content.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What if I CRISPR my tits for a better nutrient profile. Can I make money selling vegan dairy then?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That opens up the possibility of vegan cheese, butter, etc. but as true dairy products.

There actually are vegan dairy-ish products out there. Several startups have inserted the gene for casein (the main protein in milk) into yeast. So you just harvest the casein, add a little bit of some sort of fat and sugar and you have something that's 99% the same as milk, and can be used in the same sorts of processes.

The only product that I've actually tried was some Brave Robot ice cream, which was well... ice cream.

[–] LemmyFeed@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but did the yeast consent to that?

[–] Zirconium@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Yes they did. The ate the food and shat out lactose

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I believe it depends on the sub-type of Veganism. Some forms of it are more strict and don't allow for as much if any leeway.

[–] MadBob@feddit.nl 4 points 7 months ago

The other thing about it is that mammals, with rare exceptions, have to have had a baby before they produce milk, and of course since dairy farmers want to make a profit, they just force pregnancy on their animals and take their babies away to bring about a "surplus" of milk for them to sell. So if this ends up happening with people, I want no part of it.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago (3 children)

You can buy breast milk in America.

I would rather get it straight from the jugs instead of out of a jug.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I'm ngl I completely forgot milk banks existed but I was also meaning as more of a regular item in the dairy section of whatever grocer you frequent

[–] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wow, look at the milk banks on her

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] x3i@kbin.social 31 points 7 months ago (4 children)

No, I'll keep on getting mine from the fridge at work.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

The funniest part is that post is what started the thought process that lead to this question.

[–] Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

How do you milk a fridge?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've drank person milk from two different people. It's pretty thin and watery, but sweeter than cow's milk. On the whole I don't feel like I'm missing anything by not having more of it.

[–] Bdtrngl@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Calling it person milk is technically correct but boy oh boy does it make me uncomfortable.

[–] lemmefixdat4u@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

It is for sale commercially. Hella expensive! $107 for 50 ml.

https://www.innov-research.com/products/single-donor-human-breast-milk

Now you can get it from private individuals for less - a buck or two per ounce, plus overnight shipping. But there are no food safety guarantees. You have no idea who the donor is, what kind of diet they have (may be an issue if you have food or drug allergies), or their health. That's why it's not recommended by the FDA.

[–] Cuberoot@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 7 months ago

I assumed the only reason we don't already is because of the ethical issues with subjecting human women to the practices that make bovine milk economical.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

See this is one of my biggest issues with Lemmy. The pedantry.

I don't know any person irl who wouldn't know exactly what I mean when I say breast milk.

Because no one refers to any other milk as breast milk.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thirteene@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I have nipples Greg, can you milk me?

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Maybe if it had a sexy mascot or something

[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Well, idk about buying but I'll start selling

[–] mononomi@feddit.nl 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I would, but I also think this would turn bad as soon as this was a big commercially available thing.The people pumping would probably be exploited to the point their kids actually needing the milk would get less.

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Wet-nursing is a thing. Most probably, they'll use hormones to induce lactation in willing women. The question is output.

[–] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Probably not, I don't even drink cows milk any more. Not because I'm vegan or anything like that, just purely for practical reasons. Cow milk goes off at the drop of a hat but I always manage to get through all my oat milk or almond milk without it turning.

[–] Magus@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Seriously, cows milk even pasteurized goes bad way too quickly since I only use it for coffee or cereal.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago

I don't see an issue with it, aside from the fact that it would almost certainly be ridiculously expensive. It's likely more hygienic than cow or goat milk, and you know that the people doing it would be doing so at least as consensually as anyone does any labor in a capitalist society.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BuryMyHorse@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

For the novelty. Especially if it comes from someone who is on dilaudid

load more comments (2 replies)

I prefer a titties to table milk

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Having tasted breast milk as an adult: Nah. Unless I get to have it directly from the titty, it's not something I would choose to drink.

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Having had it straight from the source, I have to agree. The method of delivery really defines the experience. I'm not likely to buy a jug of it, but I'd pay $3.69 for a titty in my mouth.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Nah. I switched from cow milk to plant milk a couple years ago and while it wasn’t awesome at first, once I discovered oat milk my troubles were over. It’s so damn good. I don’t see how human milk would be an improvement.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I wouldn't buy it, but if that industry needs people to help with the milking part I might be available.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I tasted it when my wife was pregnant. Not disgusting, but not something I'd go out of my way for.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 3 points 7 months ago

No. I don't think many people would unless they had some kind of fetish.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So many issues here... Is the harvesting consensual? Are children being deprived?

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean I picture it like working at a factory. Clock in and start pumping. Also I picture it like certain dairy farms with how they wait for the calf to be fully weened before harvesting the rest, so children wouldn't be being deprived.

Plus if they were being deprived finding more breast milk wouldn't exactly be hard ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›