253
Washington Post cartoon team skewers paper’s decision not to make endorsement
(www.theguardian.com)
The editorial board endorsed her anyway. Fuck Bezos.
this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
253 points (99.2% liked)
News
23266 readers
2980 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It has fallen to me, the humor columnist, to endorse Harris for president
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/10/26/washington-post-endorses-kamala-harris-satire/
Embarrassingly enough, I like this country. But everything good about it has been the product of centuries of people who had no reason to hope for better but chose to believe that better things were possible, clawing their way uphill — protesting, marching, voting, and, yes, doing the work of journalism — to build this fragile thing called democracy. But to be fragile is not the same as to be perishable, as G.K. Chesterton wrote. Simply do not break a glass, and it will last a thousand years. Smash it, and it will not last an instant. Democracy is like that: fragile, but only if you shatter it.
Humor columnist hits hard.
I’m just a humor columnist. I only know what’s happening because our actual journalists are out there reporting, knowing that their editors have their backs, that there’s no one too powerful to report on, that we would never pull a punch out of fear. That’s what our readers deserve and expect: that we are saying what we really think, reporting what we really see; that if we think Trump should not return to the White House and Harris would make a fine president, we’re going to be able to say so.
That’s why I, the humor columnist, am endorsing Kamala Harris by myself!
That too. More courage than Bezos would ever muster.
Can I subscribe just to her?
You may very well be able to soon. But it will be to her Substack.
This pregnant woman has bigger balls than Bezos, what a fuckin legend
The case for Donald Trump is “I erroneously think the economy used to be better? I know that he has made many ominous-sounding threats about mass deportations, going after his political enemies, shutting down the speech of those who disagree with him (especially media outlets), and that he wants to make things worse for almost every category of person — people with wombs, immigrants, transgender people, journalists, protesters, people of color — but … maybe he’ll forget.”
I am one of the "cancelled subscriptions". I am trying NYT for a bit and Guardian if NYT doesn't gel with me. This was a terrible move by Bezos.
I have been extremely disappointed by most of my colleagues in tech lately.
Bezos basically Streisand Effected the whole thing. Moron.
I'm cancelling too but I'm not convinced on NYT or The guardian yet.
NYT strikes me as horribly inept at technology. Guardian is foreign (granted: UK is barely foreign lol but foreign anyway). I'd like to support an American paper if at all possible.
Guardian is good material though. It's a top contender for now but I'm still looking for American papers. Surely something in this big country is worth supporting?
I mean, maybe I just support aftermath.site (aka: Kotaku before they quit/were replaced with the new writers). Video game news + politics is kinda what I'm interested in, but Aftermath.site (and Kotaku of old) didn't even pretend to be neutral or facts based.
I guess the modern Internet means that I need to pick and choose a-la-carte.
I lost respect for the NYT after their How Hamas weaponized sexual violence story turned out to be a much of hearsay featuring a writer who liked a post calling Palestinians human animals
Not just hearsay, written by an ex IDF soldier without any journalistic experience.
Nobody should support NYT financially. It is a disservice to journalism.
I'm fine with right wingers in my media honestly. I need to see their arguments anyway. I don't want to be blind to what the far right is talking about.
But with that being said, the NYT has a lot of questionable stories. Beyond just right wing trash that I honestly am cool with.
You may be interested in The Righting then. It's an aggregate for centrists/leftists to read what the right wing is writing. The creator often has short columns as well.
I guess the modern Internet means that I need to pick and choose a-la-carte.
This has always been "best practice". I want to support one big outlet that has the muscle to put pressure on an administration, but that doesn't mean that they become my only source of news. At the moment I tip Guardian whenever I read an article that I feel went the extra mile. I need to figure out how to tip Al Jazeera too because they have been amazing for years. No outlet is perfect and many sins I can forgive. Bending to the will of a billionaire is not one of those sins.
Terrible alternatives. Consider independent media such as the intercept or dropsite.