this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
188 points (95.2% liked)

World News

38978 readers
2951 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Special Operation Range

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 69 points 1 month ago (32 children)

The russian army is entirely bound in its invasion into Ukraine. If it weren't for the threat of nuclear annihilation, NATO would get to Moscow within 3 days. A true 3-day military operation.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, no, don't worry, they still have their secondary army of sad conscripts (poor people only, don't worry) who are ritually tortured for a year as a rite of adulthood.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that's the army they're using at the moment, I remember seeing news stories of elderly Farmers being conscripted over a year ago

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

There's a second, even-sadder army behind that one. In the Donbass, (previously? Not sure how it is now) legally distinct from Russia itself, they were just mass-conscripting people for the meat grinder. The actual Russian citizens in Ukraine, though, are overwhelmingly volunteers (and overwhelmingly impoverished ethnic minorities) who were bribed or tortured during their rite of adulthood until they said "Dying in Ukraine is better than this" and 'voluntarily' signed a service contract.

[–] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

third times the charm right?

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Implying western countries never invaded Moscow or something? Poland held it for a year, russians made it a national holiday when they finally got it back.

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Too bad Poland didn't stay

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 51 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Is anyone, anywhere in the West afraid of this happening?

It might just be time to shut them the fuck up for good.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

They won't shut up they'll give warnings each time something comes along. They switched their nonsense from "red lines" to "open war" because that sells better to fearmongers. In reality, Ukraine has shown in Kursk how much the red lines mean - that is fuckall. Biden just needs to stop being a pussy and say yes.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm slightly worried about the really big guns russia supposedly have, but only slightly. At this point, it's not like there's a big red "launch" button on putin's desk; it'd have to go through a few people that may have the actual big picture in their mind.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

We bought those people off decades ago, all their yachts, townhouses and other decent shit is as far from Russia as possible.

But if they see they can back us down and let them invade a country by waving nukes, they will be greatly encouraged to do so again, the cost/benefit ratio is far too high, they're getting something for literally nothing.

This is exactly how world wars start.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 1 month ago

Maybe the word "directly" didn't translate well. If Russia engages NATO directly, their forces will be wiped off the map. Ukraine is using old NATO equipment from the 90s that was pulled out of storage and kicking all kinds of Russian ass. Direct NATO involvement would mean carrier groups, F35s, stealth bombers, and a whole lot of other fun things the Russians have zero answer for.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Okay. Send in Poland to end the war. They'll be thrilled, I'm sure.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At this point, I think Estonia could do it alone.

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

I know some Estonians, they could do it while black out drunk

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Easy loophole. Tell Eastern European countries they can do whatever the hell they want. I think several have a score to settle with Russia.

But seriously if Putin would prefer to not have deep strikes into Russia, then maybe we could meet him halfway -- send a NATO coalition to Ukraine and steamroll Russia out. Including from Crimea.

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

Good, fuck you Putin.

[–] Tramdan@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 month ago

So he's currently struggling against just Ukraine but he's warning us that he could end up facing the whole of NATO?

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 22 points 1 month ago
[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Do eeeitttt. Russia is already invaded by Ukraine with no direct participation of NATO. Let's see how they do against actual NATO planes, tanks, ships and soldiers.

[–] zik@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Didn't he already repeatedly claim that he's fighting directly with the West?

Even in his own words what would this change?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Bring it you ruskie coward.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But answer me this: is Russia allowed to use long-range missiles?

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Yes and so is Ukraine.

The issue was whether Ukraine using externally supplied long range missiles counted as escalation. Which is a non-issue since Russia is using externally supplied (from Iran and NK) long range missiles - they already escalated it.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Give to them by their allies?

Yes.

But using them long range?

Also yes.

On civilian targets?

Well actually yes too.

Just give the Ukrainians the needs to erase the existance of russian army inside its borders ffs (so including long range strikes inside all of russia).

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I can understand how the guidance systems being still controlled by NATO satellites/support mechanisms would be considered a different level for them, but is it just more sabre rattling? That's the question.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Yes, this is just more saber rattling.

load more comments
view more: next ›