this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
242 points (99.2% liked)

News

23259 readers
3379 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The New York Police Department has tossed out hundreds of civilian complaints about police misconduct this year without looking at the evidence.

The cases were fully investigated and substantiated by the city’s police oversight agency, the Civilian Complaint Review Board, and sent to the NYPD for disciplinary action. They included officers wrongfully searching vehicles and homes, as well as using excessive force against New Yorkers.

In one instance, an officer punched a man in the groin, the oversight agency found. In another, an officer unjustifiably tackled a young man, and then another officer wrongly stopped and searched him, according to the CCRB.

The incident involving the young man was one of dozens of stop-and-frisk complaints the NYPD dismissed without review this year — a significant development given that the department is still under federal monitoring that a court imposed more than a decade ago over the controversial tactic.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] norimee@lemmy.world 76 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The headline is somewhat misleading because its even worse

The cases were fully investigated and substantiated by the city’s police oversight agency, the Civilian Complaint Review Board, and sent to the NYPD for disciplinary action.

The cases were looked at and found valid and substaniated.

In every public facing job you always have nonsense complains from main-character-people that you can just dismiss. But these were not that. Not even partly. They were all rightful complains.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Not investigated by the NYPD though. I agree it's bad that these complaints have been vetted and they still threw them out, but based on the bit you quoted, it's accurate to say the NYPD didn't look at them.

[–] norimee@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I didn't say its false, just that they left out an important fact.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] norimee@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To add the point I wanted to make was, this was not an oversight because there were so many inconsequential complains, they didn't bother to look for valid ones.

This was with Intent. A "Fuck you with your misconduct complains, I won't even look at them, I'm not gonna discipline my people"

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

No disagreement from me!

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 40 points 1 month ago

That's what you get for electing a corrupt cop as mayor.

Also Adams is yet another example, why having someone from a marginalized group in office does not mean that the represents or even really cares about the needs of that group past his own political advantage.

[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

"We haven't investigated ourselves and assume we did nothing wrong." - NYPD

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

No, it's worse than that. This is "we refuse to investigate ourselves and actively reject the CCRB's finding of fact that we did something wrong."

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

So I take it this means the NYPD thinks groin punches are appropriate?

ACAB.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

"Protect and serve" - but only if you're rich.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It is really beyond time for citizen review boards to stop being "advisory" and to start having the authority to impose punishments directly themselves.

As it stands, such boards exist to give the appearance of doing something about police brutality, but not actually be effective at it, and that's 1000% by design.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

That's if they exist. Mayors/governors/councils/congress keep shutting down inconvenient oversight wherever possible.