this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
211 points (97.7% liked)

movies

1746 readers
461 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

πŸ”Ž Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Earlier this month, Borderlands arrived in theaters to horrendous reviews and bad box office numbers. At the time, many assumed it might be the biggest cinematic dud of 2024. But, that title is now held by the newly released Crow reboot.

The idea of rebooting The Crow was already a strange and controversial one. Sure, the original 1994 film was a small but profitable hit, but it is more widely known for the tragedy surrounding the death of Brandon Lee during its production. The following sequels to the OG Crow failed to find success. Most people believed it was wrong to even reboot the series. Yet, Hollywood went ahead and made a reboot anyway. And what do you know, it’s flopping hard!

The Crow reboot released on August 23 to negative reviews from critics and moviegoers. After its opening weekend, it only earned $4.6 million domestically at the box office. Yikes! In comparison, Borderlands made over $8.5 million during its first weekend.

After about five days in theaters, The Crow has made less than $10 million. Meanwhile, Borderlandsβ€”which is reportedly already getting a home release in late Augustβ€”is sitting at a cool $25 million worldwide at the box office.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rade0nfighter@lemmy.world 84 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Day, me say day, me say day, me say day Me say day, me say day-o.

Daylight come and me wan' go home

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 8 points 2 months ago

The Crowening.

[–] anonymouse2@sh.itjust.works 50 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Based on a ratio of box office to production budget, Borderlands is still the biggest bomb hands down.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do we have the budget for the Crow? It definitely seems cheaper with that lame ending, but they didn't spend no money on advertising either.

[–] anonymouse2@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

the-numbers.com has it at $50m

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 3 points 2 months ago

OK well dang, really proving that movie costs explode from digital effects.

It will be fun to see if any movie manages to beat the flop that is Borderlands then by end of the year. Doubtful.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 32 points 2 months ago (5 children)

has anyone past the 90s been able to pull off anything even remotely "goth"?

[–] deus@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

Well, the Visigothic Kingdom lasted for 30 more years after 690, so I'm inclined to say yes.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Wednesday was incredibly popular and is probably why there's a bit of a goth revival going on.

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Type O Negative had two albums in the 2000's, and they were only OK (especially compared to their 90's albums), but I'd say they still count as "pulling off something remotely 'goth'"

Plus, Nine Inch Nails has some good stuff in the aughts, and Trent Reznor's brand of industrial rock is definitely "goth-adjacent," as are My Chemical Romance's The Black Parade (2006, I think) and AFI's Sing the Sorrow (2003), which are both great albums.

And in more recent music, the band Creeper is really killing it. Their rock opera Sex, Death, and the Infinite Void is very goth and it's amazingly good (especially as someone who turned his nose up at pop-punk as a kid).

In non-music media, there have been some really good comics with goth aesthetics in the last 20 years, and I can give some good recs if anyone is interested.

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Does The Batman count? Or is that emo? Please don't hate me, I'm an old man.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

i was never goth, i don't know what the minimum brooding darkness threshold is, but i hung around goths enough in the 90s to be pretty sure batman would not be considered goth. anne rice crap = definitely goth. the crow remake = definitely NOT goth

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 5 points 2 months ago

Man the new Interview with a Vampire is definitely goth.

Goth generally doesn't have an uplifting single hero but a bunch of people all collectively wallowing in the mud of sorrow together vibe to it as someone that is basically pastel goth.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Wat, you mean music? Lots of good stuff. Check out:

for more look here: https://www.wave-gotik-treffen.de/english/past.php?reqYear=2023

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 5 points 2 months ago

We've been covering both films here for a while. Hit "subscribe" for all your movie news that's fit to e-print.

[–] Don_Dickle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

This is why for the past years I download my movies.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 18 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I've heard about both of these releases for the first time recently and had no idea they were out, so problem number 1 identified.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I mean, how do you typically hear about movies? I saw trailers for both at the last movie I was at, and Borderlands had a pretty big ad run.

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I never go to theaters. I hadn't heard anything about the crow but borderlands was pretty much unavoidable. I saw ads for that thing absolutely everywhere.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I didn't, but I would have gone to see it if I knew.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No... Don't say that about your self. Life is worth more than that.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago

Nah it ain't

Sometimes I watch Mystery Science Theatre 3000, I have literally no narrative standards.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I don't go to movies very often, but I might if I heard more about what is playing. Targeting ads at people already viewing them regularly seems unsustainable.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Although they are the ones who go to the cinema regularly. Targeting them at people who don't go seems a waste.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

But if they stop going at any point then they stop hearing about it. Its a naturally shrinking demographic.

You need to reach out to new audiences to replace old ones. We need ads at locations and on platforms frequented by youth (under 30) to see good box office returns for obscure films.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Problems 1 and 2 are: no-one thought this was a good idea when they were announced and that turned out to be the case. Not letting people know was them cutting their losses - Borderlands ad spend was very much lower than a film of that budget should have had and it's likely down to the fact that they knew it'd crash and burn so they didn't want to throw good money after bad.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 2 points 2 months ago

I thought it was a good idea when it was Jason Momoa as The Crow but that's just cause I think he is a secret emo and it would have been funny.

[–] Die4Ever@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

why advertise bad movies? just a waste of money doing marketing

[–] SineSwiper@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why create bad movies? It's a waste of money in the first place.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 4 points 2 months ago

Well the Borderlands movie gave a bunch of Hollywood socialites a vacation in Budapest before the covid restrictions were completely released in California.... So probably for reasons like that.

[–] Die4Ever@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

Well they don't always know ahead of time the movie will be bad, but once the movie is finished or nearly finished they can watch the movie and decide if it's worth a lot of marketing or not

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

While true it also becomes a self fulfilling prophecy though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

They actually released this thing in the theater? Wow, talk about being completely out of touch.

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago

Who makes box office flops when they use our symbol without permission?

We do! illuminati

[–] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I feel like hardly anybody except hardcore movie fans knew this movie was coming out until the eve of its release. This is surely still a massive flop, but it ain't surprising.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Really? I've been casually seeing ads and hearing about it for months

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 4 points 2 months ago

The trailers have been running for a while and it has been talked about on social media quite a bit (rarely in a good light). I also assume it would be on the radar of fans of the games but I suspect most announcements would have annoyed them (quite who the target audience was is a mystery).

[–] CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is this the lowest rated year of movies ever? Does rotten tomatoes do average ratings by year?

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 6 points 2 months ago

I don't think they do.

More interesting would be crunching the numbers at Box Office Mojo, who have an annual overview but it would be worth taking, for example, the ten or twenty films of the year with the largest budgets and look at the returns. I smell a spreadsheet coming on!

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If they did it by year 1993-1994 would blow every other year out of the water

[–] CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 3 points 2 months ago

Ooooh Eric from The Regulation Podcast will be feeling this. He spent double the points on The Crow that Andrew spent on Twisters πŸ˜‚

[–] blackfire@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are 3 other Crow films that people just forget about. For some weird reason. I don't know why this one gets so much hate. They should totally build out the Crow universe

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Huh? It gets so much hate cause it's unnecessary and apparently crap. And you're saying they should do more of this??

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] szynaptic@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is The Crow this year's Morbius?

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί