this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
195 points (96.2% liked)

News

23259 readers
3379 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 74 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Google really wants to be broken up, huh?

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

When they juat focused on cool tech for the sake of tech they were great ( and the Don't be evil mantra). now it is just shareholder profit driven, and they kill stuff when numbers aren't constant growth

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They killed stuff before.

Google's downfall seems to be this weird promotion culture where you only get attention by launching new products. That's why they keep introducing half assed messengers. Nobody gets anything from maintaining a successful product.

That combined with myopic shareholder value management gives us the corporate equivalent of a 12 year old kid with ADHD and a bad tamper.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They killed stuff before when it failed. Now it's just fucking weird. They're killing the Chromecast. Why? I have no clue. It has decent sales.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 13 points 2 months ago

Google Reader didn't fail. And they killed it for no reason.

Chromecasts are probably simply not profitable enough. The device class is served by cheaper sticks and given the absurd salaries and profit expectations of these firms, it's probably not "worth it".

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The company’s invite-only Team Pixel program — which seeds Pixel products to influencers before public availability — stipulated that participating influencers were not allowed to feature Pixel products alongside competitors, and those who showed a preference for competing phones risked being kicked out of the program.

Good move right after a judge ruled you're a monopoly using your position to influence the market. This doesn't reinforce that you engage in bad behavior at all. /s

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 5 points 2 months ago

Google is the very awkward kid in elementary school who tries way too hard to be liked, but does everything wrong and screams, why doesn’t even like me? I am perfect!

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

This is being reported poorly. This is a voluntary program that is intended for social media brand embassadors, aka, the people who go out and rep a brand. It makes sense to include some language requiring someone prepping your brand to show preferable to it.

[–] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

The agreement tells participants they’re “expected to feature the Google Pixel device in place of any competitor mobile devices.” It also notes that “if it appears other brands are being preferred over the Pixel, we will need to cease the relationship between the brand and the creator.” The link to the form appears to have since been shut down.

This is some Disney Influencer-level bullshit, where they just dole out premium perks to influencers who will endlessly and exclusively positively shill their shit.

[–] grubbyweasel@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Google’s official Pixel review program for publications like The Verge requires no such stipulations. (And, to be clear, The Verge would never accept such terms, in accordance with our ethics policy.)

So then, what is Team Pixel, exactly? Officially, it’s a program handled by PR agency 1000heads that seeds early units to influencers and superfans to drum up interest as brand ambassadors. While Google partners with 1000heads, it doesn’t directly run the program, and there are distinct differences from the traditional reviews program. For example, journalists and influencers in the official reviews program often get briefed and given products under embargo before or during an event. Team Pixel participants get the devices shortly after launch but before the public — all in exchange for some coverage on social media. For smaller creators, this can be a big leg up in terms of access.

extremely critical context here, this is kind of a non story tbh

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

100% this is a non-story.

It's a brand ambassador program. It's not a review program. The entire point is to promote a product.

If you are hired specifically to promote a product, and you instead shit on the product, you don't get hired in the future. It doesn't take a rocket scientist for this one. The Verge, while including an actual explanation buried in the article, is massively editorializing the headline, to the point it's not even really accurate anymore. They're not threatening influencers, those are the stipulations to be part of a specific program to receive free product early with the express purpose of promoting it.

[–] grubbyweasel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah that headline is frankly ridiculous

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, it's still sleazy but it sounds like the only threat is that influencers who don't say since things about the free toys they got won't get any more free toys.

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

This is m3an to target "pixel influencers". Those don't exist. Only Apple and Samsung has does. I can't think of a single " Google " channel. I can't really think of any Samsung either but they do have a cult following plus eco system, so more chances of them being out there.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

“Be Evil.”

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

The Verge - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Verge:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.theverge.com/2024/8/16/24221755/google-team-pixel-reviews-influencers
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support