• givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    The White House said Sunday that the Federal Emergency Management Agency had sent emergency responders, search-and-rescue teams, bottled water, and other resources along the coast.

    I get that they’re helping to get votes…

    I just hate how red states refuse to help Blue states.

    And if there’s a Republican president, feds won’t help blue states.

    Yet, Dems constantly bail out red states.

    Give them help because it’s the people that suffer, but give the state government a bill.

    This isn’t getting caught once with you pants down and learning the lesson, red states are actively fighting science and not taking the steps to prevent this shit in the future. And everyone else has to pay for them when we have our own problems.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The difference between red and blue voters is that red votes to hurt people while blue votes to help people.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        You missed a part apparently…

        Give them help because it’s the people that suffer, but give the state government a bill.

        • jaspersgroove@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          Red states routinely get more money from the federal government than they contribute to it, almost without exception.

    • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      It pisses me off how Ted Cruz and others vote against things like Hurricane Sandy relief but take everything they can get for shit like Harvey.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Also: privatize the profits, socialize the losses. I’m sure Ted has investments in disaster response companies.

    • ccunning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      And if there’s a Republican president, feds won’t help blue states.

      Once Project 2025 does away with the NOAA and the NHC they won’t even be able to pre-stage assistance for red states…

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you help the people, and then give the state the bill, you understand that it’s still the people who will suffer, right? You’ve just changed when and how.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        To pay it they have to raise taxes or cut services…

        Something voters will feel, and make it more likely they vote out the current shit leadership.

        I live in a red state, I know what I’m saying we do and there’s a nonzero chance it happens to the state I live in…

        Doesn’t make it a bad plan. It means I’ve thought of the consequences long before making that social media comment.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Something voters will feel, and make it more likely they vote out the current shit leadership.

            • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              I just don’t think that we’re going to agree that “the people need to suffer, if not in this way then another” is the enlightened take that you seem to think that it is. So I’ll agree to disagree here, have a good day.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                I think I’m just not being clear:

                They will suffer more if republicans stay in charge.

                Bailing them out over and over again makes them think Republicans are doing a good job

                Republicans having to raise their taxes to cover lack of preparedness even as more continue to happ ns makes them realize shit is not being handled, and that replacing the republicans would be a good idea.

                We agree, you’re just thinking short term.

                And I’m saying how to fix it long term rather than having the short term problem over and over and over again u til the end of time.

                • Tinidril@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I think you are assuming way to much rationality on the part of Republican voters. Republican politicians will just blame the Democrats, immigrants, and DEI for the failures, and Republican voters will eat it up.

                • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  I have understood your position as you just explained it since your first comment; you have been clear. I don’t think we agree at all, to be honest.