Amazon is phasing out its checkout-less grocery stores with “Just Walk Out” technology, first reported by The Information Tuesday. The company’s senior vice president of grocery stores says they’re moving away from Just Walk Out, which relied on cameras and sensors to track what people were leaving the store with.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    According to The Information, 700 out of 1,000 Just Walk Out sales required human reviewers as of 2022. This widely missed Amazon’s internal goals of reaching less than 50 reviews per 1,000 sales.

    Lmao.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      idk…

      According to The Information, 700 out of 1,000 Just Walk Out sales required human reviewers as of 2022. This widely missed Amazon’s internal goals of reaching less than 50 reviews per 1,000 sales. Amazon called this characterization inaccurate, and disputes how many purchases require reviews.

      if Amazon wasn’t the source of this number, where is it coming from?

      • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not an expert but uh, I don’t think this had anything to do with AI. It was just a scanner in a basket.

        • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Scanners in baskets/carts is what they are replacing this with.

          The ‘Just Walk Out’ system was as the name implies; grab product and leave. No scanners, no checkout, no cashiers; just cameras watching you shop, and a heavy implication that that video is primarily watched by AI to determine your purchases. AFAIK the only scanners were to read a qr code on entry to associate you with your amazon account; the rest is hands off. Or at least that’s what it’s supposed to be. Seems there’s a lot more labour under the hood than the advertising said. Shocker.

            • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Yes, because when you run systems like that, you use the AI, and you have the people as a fallback for when the AI fails.

              It was primarily watched by people in India because the AI was failing the vast majority of the time.

              So yeah, the state of the art AI is… Failing at its job 70% of the time. Instead of the hoped goal of 5%.

              • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Can’t they just…add sensors to the items and add them to your Amazon account cart anytime you add pick one, dunno, using some proximity stuff from the phone itself, then charge for the items once the phone leaves the store?

                • 0xD@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Sure they can, it just isn’t as simple as “just” ;) How do you, for example, determine who picked which item if two people are standing next to each other? Or if something is put back?

                  Sure, a proof of concept will always work. Building it for the real world is a completely and utterly different beast.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          It did have AI, the cameras adjusted based on location, proximity, lighting, etc. They tracked you through the store and gavenyou a unique ID were trained to manage you being blocked from view by other shoppers.

      • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Meanwhile, my college machine learning model made to recognize three types of flower by sepal length: 92% success rate.

    • pedroapero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      This feels so creepy to, being watched spending your money by slaves on the other side of the globe, and Amazon pretending it to be automated !

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      I sat in front of one of these ideas at an airport. People are just dumb. They couldn’t figure out how to get into the store. They didn’t understand how to pay by just leaving.

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’ve said the same elsewhere, and the idiots here downvote to oblivion.

          It’s so weird. This is a basic rule of building anything that engages with the public. How can anyone assume that everyone will simply “get” how an interface works?

  • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    The Amazon near me has a “Just Fuck Off” policy. They redecorated the old Toys R Us building a few years ago and then never bothered to open the store.

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 months ago

    That immediately reminded me the story of the Mechanical Turk. Check the link for further info - to keep it short both are ways to hide human labour behind alleged automation.

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        You linked to the original Mechanical Turk.

        Yup, that’s intended. The original Mechanical Turk was a con, just like Amazon’s “just walk out” service.

        • body_by_make@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          The Amazon’s Mechanical Turk was never a con. It’s been known for a very long time that it’s a way to outsource human tasks on a large scale cheaply. Like, a very long time. I think I first heard about it like 12 years ago?

          Unless you mean the way it exploits poor countries for cheap labor. I wouldn’t call that a con, but it is fucked.

          • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            By “original Mechanical Turk”, I am clearly referring to the chess player inside a box. It was a con because the system was presented as an automaton, when it is simply human labour.

            And I am calling Amazon’s “just walk out” service also a con because it was touted as automatic, even if also being mostly human labour.

            I am not calling “Amazon’s Mechanical Turk” a con. It is exploitative, as you said, but it is not a con. People know that it is human labour, and Amazon does not try to hide it.

            Is this clear now?

            • linearchaos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              The automated walk out service wasn’t a con. It was a shortsighted, honestly s***** idea, that was never able to be brought past the human oversight stage.

              Con requires intent. I’m absolutely certain they fully intended to make it a completely humanless system. They failed and drug their feet trying and now they’ve shut it down.

              If it’s a con, what’s their long game? What are they gain from having humans watch the store remotely? Is it tech just so neat that they’ll have a lot more shoppers than a regular store? Do they save so much in on-site staff that it’s cheaper to run than a conventional store? There’s no advantage here that would make it a worthwhile con. It’s a failed moonshot that they ended up manning with people to see if they could make it work that’s all.

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                No, what makes it a con is that it was purported to be automated, but the automation was a failure and had to be done by humans almost 3/4 of the time.

              • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Just because it was a failure doesn’t make it a con.

                On its own a failure is not a con. The con is to publicly pretend that the failure is not there.

                And Amazon is clearly doing the later - read the quote from the spokesperson in the article, it boils down to “The system is automated! «Chrust us lol». The human labour there is just, for, uh… improvements!” Yeah, sure, and the 1770 machine is totally automated too, the chess player there is just the maintenance worker /s

            • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              And I am calling Amazon’s “just walk out” service also a con because it was touted as automatic, even if also being mostly human labour.

              That’s not what a con is. A con is a deliberate scam. Amazon’s automated checkout simply didn’t function as effectively as intended. They presumably lost money on the venture because the automation was unreliable. Nothing about this situation was a deliberate attempt to pay over 1,000 employees to check an automated system’s work.

              The Mechanical Turk is an interesting story and I’m glad you linked it, but it’s not all that similar.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The Amazon’s Mechanical Turk was never a con.

            I wouldn’t go that far. They heavily implied that you could make a decent living doing it, not 20 cents per survey or whatever it is.

    • Brunacho@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      I believe it was Molly White (@molly0xfff@hachyderm.io ) who said that every AI idea like this will eventually be revealed to be a mechanical turk. So far she seems right on point.

  • knotthatone@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s a shame this isn’t working out, I was really hoping it would turn out to be a better way of doing self-checkouts.

    The little convenience store on my way to work is nice, but I guess it falls apart in a larger store situation.

  • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    What is preventing someone from just walking into a random store with no Amazon account and walking out with stuff?

      • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t know about Walmart but I heard Target will facial recognize you and deliberately wait across multiple trips until you have stolen enough to make it grand theft before taking action.

        • isles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          Is that tracking distributed across stores or do I have license to steal $9999 from each one?

          • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            8 months ago

            Probably the amount stolen within the same state. But once you’re committing crimes across state lines, you’ve got bigger problems on your hands.

            And yes, they definitely share data across their whole company.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Not much. Employees don’t give a fuck and if they did, they would probably get fired for trying to stop a thief.

        Actually, many places where I live are scaling back self-checkout. I suspect it’s because the geniuses who tried to save a buck by getting rid of tellers didn’t realize they would lose more from theft. (It’s amazing how many people don’t give two fucks about shareholder profits, actually.)

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah that was my point. :P

          A thief is a thief, someone willing to steal from a store covered from top to bottom in cameras and sensors is going to be willing to steal from just about anywhere.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t know where you live, but I’ve been in many Walmarts in the U.S. and they have private security who are never posted at the exit that I’ve ever seen. Mostly they just sit in an office and watch security cameras.

          • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’ve definitely seen actual cops standing at the front of the store. They’re also there every day and park their cars up front in the fire lane.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Maybe you’ve seen it, but it’s not common in my experience.

              I just traveled across four states and, because of the bad weather, we stopped at Walmarts along the way so my elderly mother could walk around and stretch her legs.

              Not one cop.

              • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                I think it’s something they do or have done around the holidays when it’s very busy. They might be hiring off duty cops and having them wear their uniform.

    • glitch1985@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      The one I went to had a turnstile after you walk though the front door so you needed to scan the code from the app.

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It worked really smoothly for me…the one time I went cuz it was such a depressing experience. Don’t get me wrong tho. I love self checkout. Amazon store sucks.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Amazon is phasing out its checkout-less grocery stores with “Just Walk Out” technology, first reported by The Information Tuesday.

    The technology allows customers to skip checkout altogether by scanning a QR code when they enter the store.

    Though it seemed completely automated, Just Walk Out relied on more than 1,000 people in India watching and labeling videos to ensure accurate checkouts.

    However, the spokesperson acknowledged these associates validate “a small minority” of shopping visits when AI can’t determine a purchase.

    Amazon Fresh, the e-commerce giant’s grocery store first launched in 2007, has just over 40 locations around the United States.

    Amazon’s push away from expensive tests like Just Walk Out may be a sign the company is looking to further expand its presence as a supermarket.


    The original article contains 512 words, the summary contains 126 words. Saved 75%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • flames5123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Damn… I go to a corner store Amazon Go almost every time I go into the office for a flavored seltzer. They have dog treats and my my dog loves going there every time.

    I hope this is one of the convenience stores that it keeps open.

    It was weird that last year they reversed the way you pay, making you pay/scan your code on the way out. So backwards to the “just walk out” motto. They went back on it less than 6 months later.