this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
29 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38978 readers
2951 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukrainian forces would have to cede further territory to Russia if US military aid does not arrive soon, President Volodymyr Zelensky has warned, in his latest appeal to Congress to pass a multibillion-dollar package.

President Joe Biden’s administration is struggling to push a $95 billion international aid package – which includes $60 billion for Ukraine – through the House of Representatives more than month since it was passed in the Senate.

Zelensky warned that the lack of aid was urgent, and could endanger Ukraine’s major cities.

“If there is no US support, it means that we have no air defense, no Patriot missiles, no jammers for electronic warfare, no 155-millimeter artillery rounds,” he told The Washington Post during a recent interview published Friday. “It means we will go back, retreat, step by step, in small steps.”

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Republicans serve their master well.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

As long as conservatives have any power, they will always support Putin. Conservatives support genocide. That is just who they are at their core.

Throughout history, the nations committing genocide have always been the most conservative. We cannot fight genocide without fighting conservatism.

[–] HaywardT@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Losing this war is going to get us into a world war.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Everyone knows this. The people who are preventing aid have already chosen their side

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Literally siding with Russia against the American people... After all those wars against communism, this is where we wound up.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

But Russia isn't communist so that's kind of irrelevant. Modern Russia is just a very conservative corrupt dictatorship, just like what Republicans want.

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yet we can give Israel more bombs no problem

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

MRGA, fuck yeah

[–] PanArab@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Don’t pretend Biden isn’t an unabashed Zionist and didn’t go around congress to send Israel weapons

[–] nulluser@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

US: "Stop blowing up Russian oil refineries."

Ukraine: "Then fucking help us, for christ sake!"

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They never asked them to stop destroying refineries.

[–] nulluser@programming.dev 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

First of all, paywall. Second of all, IIRC "anonymous sources say" and US said they never asked them to not target oil infrastructure.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Ukrainian forces would have to cede further territory to Russia if US military aid does not arrive soon, President Volodymyr Zelensky has warned, in his latest appeal to Congress to pass a multibillion-dollar package.

“If there is no US support, it means that we have no air defense, no Patriot missiles, no jammers for electronic warfare, no 155-millimeter artillery rounds,” he told The Washington Post during a recent interview published Friday.

Much of Ukraine’s east has been under Russian military control since Moscow launched its invasion more than two years ago.

While its strategic significance is limited, the loss of Avdiivka - taken together with Moscow’s capture of the town of Bakhmut last year - indicates how the war appears to have turned in Russia’s favor.

This came after Putin secured an unsurprising victory in a widely discredited presidential election earlier this month.

“If the front remains stable, Ukraine can arm and train new brigades in the rear to conduct a new counteroffensive later this year,” he said.


The original article contains 476 words, the summary contains 165 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] graeghos_714@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

While we continue to give arms to a country committing genocide. Welcome to AIPAC power over US citizens

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The western 'aid' is restricted to holding the line, not counterattack, right? How does it serve Ukraine's interests moving forward? Establish a head to support efforts to advance into Russian territory?

[–] narp@feddit.de 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What line are you talking about? The Russian army is in ukrainian territory and needs to be kicked out, no one is talking about invading Russia.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No argument about that. But Russia (not me) still believes crimea is their territory. What I meant above is that I was under the impression that the western aid is provided under tha agreement that it will not be used on russian territories. Even if all the western countries believes Crimea belongs to Ukraine, the Russians may take it differently, causing some difficulties. I believe Russia should gtfo, willingly or by force.

[–] narp@feddit.de 1 points 7 months ago

I seem to remember sth like that was said at the beginning of the war.

Now France is talking about putting boots on the ground, multiple attacks on Crimean infrastructure already happened and Europe is getting more worried about the getting attacked as well if Putin gets his way.

I doubt anyone cares about it anymore and Putin can punch sand.

[–] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Wdym the Western aid is restricted from counterattacking? Nothing about that is true, U.S. aid is being held up solely by the Republicans, and European aid is continuing mostly as normal. None of Ukraine's counteroffensives have ever led to a decrease in aid, only an increase.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

Typically the rules have been that they can use the weapons on occupied Ukrainian lands, but not pre-2014 Russian territory.

They can use the aid to take back what has been stolen but can't use missiles to bomb Moscow for added pressure to stop the war.