• Avg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      126
      ·
      7 months ago

      When you are living paycheck to paycheck, that number is probably the same.

      • PatMustard@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        If your expenses are more than your pay then you can either get a better paying job, cut your expenses by moving, or die

        • fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          There are other ways to cut expenses too. I’ll bet a lot of people (not all, but a lot of them, maybe even a majority) are paying for things they don’t need when they’re living paycheck to paycheck. Things like Spotify, Netflix, fast food, car washes, probably even car payments on a car that is beyond their means or at the least way more car than they need.

          Every friend of mine I’ve helped get to a financially stable and responsible point in their life could do it without having to increase their income. Obviously an increase in income makes it a lot easier to do this, but if you don’t have the behaviors down, then you’re just going to creep your lifestyle when you make more money.

          • PatMustard@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            You are correct, of course; I’m being facetious because half the comments here seem to be from people who are renting somewhere that costs their entire salary

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            paying for things they don’t need

            What you mean by ‘don’t need’ is ‘don’t need as long as they don’t want to have a slightly better level of life quality than if they were dirt poor.’

            You don’t literally need things like Netflix or fast food, but they make your life more tolerable right now so that you don’t die of the endless stress and misery.

            Sure, there are ways some people can cut expenses. There are also ways people could cut expenses, but at the expense of their own basic mental health.

            • fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              7 months ago

              Not having Netflix and the like does not make one dirt poor. That is such an entitled view to have. Literally first world problems if your mental health can’t handle not having the latest entertainment. Go to a library for goodness sakes.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                I didn’t say they were. Please re-read what I wrote:

                What you mean by ‘don’t need’ is ‘don’t need as long as they don’t want to have a slightly better level of life quality than if they were dirt poor.

                Yes, you can go to a library. I love libraries. My wife is a librarian. That doesn’t mean I don’t think people shouldn’t spend $7 a month for a lowest tier Netflix account just to make their lives a little better. Maybe Netflix wouldn’t make your life better. Someone with kids who wants them to be able to watch Teletubbies or Peppa Pig whenever they want, that makes both the parents’ lives and the kids’ lives better.

                You are doing something no different from the “stop eating so much avocado toast” guy. Maybe not having avocado toast is a first world problem, but those people don’t live in a third world country. So why should they live like they do?

                I was super poor in the 1990s. I still bought CDs and DVDs because they made my life better so I wasn’t unhappy all the time. Sure, I could have gotten all of my music and movies from the library. On the other hand, I couldn’t have listened to the music I liked any time I wanted. Could I have instead saved that money for an emergency or for retirement? Sure I could have. It would have made my life worse and, yes, been damaging to my mental health. I’m not sure why you think libraries existing cure any mental health issues brought upon by not being able to afford to have a better quality of life in a first world country.

                • fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I’m not saying Netflix and fast food are keeping people poor like that guy about avocado toast.

                  I’m saying that if you can’t afford an emergency, that’s an emergency itself.

                  Buying fast food and Netflix (and all the other things that go with that) instead of saving up so you can afford an emergency is irresponsible.

                  Not being able to afford Netflix and/or fast food isn’t being “slightly better quality of life than if they were dirt poor.” I may not have been dirt poor. But I was buy expired milk and bread to freeze, can’t afford minutes for my flip phone while my friends have smart phones, poor. And my quality of life wasn’t “slightly better” than “dirt poor.” I had a furnished apartment, a color TV, and was able to borrow videos from the library for entertainment.

    • Conyak@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Also, 6 months may be more than needed depending on your field. If you lost your job today how long would it take you to find a new one? It could be six month but maybe less. I keep 3 months of expenses on hand because it has never taken me more than a month to find a different job.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Do- do you think I don’t have to spend most of my pay every month just to survive…?

  • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Didn’t anyone notice during covid these “highly responsible business people” couldn’t make it a couple months without the “to big to fail” bailouts or free covid money?

  • Entropy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    So if I want to accomplish this in a year I should be putting away half of every paycheck? Between rent, bills and groceries, who the fuck can afford that?

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Most people can’t afford it in a year.

        People who inherited a sizeable amount of money or are in the top 10% of earners are able to do so.

        • RagnarokOnline@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 months ago

          I world say it’s getting to 3-months first, then paying down debt with high-interest rates, then trying for 6-months of expenses. Could easily take a decade, but the idea is that once you have that 6-months saved, it’s less likely that you’ll re-enter into high-interest debt in the first place.

          • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            Saving 3 months in an emergency fund while accruing high interest debt seems crazy to me.

            Most people, especially those not very knowledgeable about personal finance, really should follow the Dave Ramsey baby steps.

        • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          How long is a piece of string?

          Depends on how much you earn, what are your expenses, and how much you have saved already.

        • scoobford@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s a however long it takes goal. I’m hoping to have it done in 2, although 3 and change is more realistic.

          Unfortunately, if you can’t afford to live with financial security, you can’t afford to live. I haven’t had an entertainment budget in over a year, and food has basically been what’s on sale at the grocery store and maybe a gyro every month.

          • fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            I wish you the best of luck. It isn’t easy. Getting out of debt and having a fully funded emergency fund is a great feeling.

      • scoobford@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You don’t have to. Start early, save aggressively, get it done before you worry about upgrading your lifestyle.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        “Just start a small business.”

        That’s what I keep hearing from Republicans.

        I actually owned a small business, which is why I understand what bullshit advice that is.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Psh look at this sun breather. I just de-evolved myself by my bootstraps and float near a hydrothermal vent like a real adult

    • PatMustard@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      People with less expenses, people with a higher salary, people who live in a less expensive area, etc, etc.

    • Lowpast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Most people don’t accomplish 6 months emergency fund in 1 year, no. It’s a marathon, not a sprint.

    • scoobford@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      6 months of expenses, not income.

      Most people can. I make $40k per year in a major city, and I’m getting there.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Considering rent or mortgages alone takes a vast percentage of many people’s paychecks before you factor in things like student loan and medical debts, most people cannot.

        And I have no idea how you can even live on $40k a year in a major city unless you’re eating beans and rice with every meal and living in a studio apartment with 4 other people.

        • scoobford@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Median income here is in the mid $60’s. I’m definitely poor, but I do save some money.

          I live alone, and cook basically all my meals. Eating out and processed foods from a grocery store are both too pricey for more than once or twice a month. Mostly buy meat and fresh produce because carbs tend to give me stomach issues in large amounts.

          Unfortunately, I am disabled. So while I have insurance, I cannot afford to see a specialist as regularly as I should. To be fair, this is out of network and like $700/month on top of my existing premiums and HSA contributions.

          If nothing too crazy happens in the next year, I’ll be able to change jobs and get my medical care back in network, meaning I don’t need to ration doctor’s visits for my disability. If nothing happens in 2 or 3, I’ll have my emergency savings in a very good place. If nothing happens in 5, I might pay cash for my next car.

          After that, fuck it. I’ll be financially stable, I’ll have another decade before I have a planned major expense like a car, and home ownership is a pipe dream here anyways. Last I looked, they start around $400k, which would mean coming up with about $180,000 for my down payment lol

          Edit: Since you brought it up specifically, my rent and utilities is about $1200. I live in a very old building in a shitty neighborhood. The jail is right across the street, so there’s enough of a police presence to keep it safe. It is clean, but my landlord is fucking terrible and I have to sue or threaten to sue to get anything fixed.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Sorry that you have to go through all of that. I’m dealing with a mystery illness right now which involves food, so I understand.

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I make plenty of money and it took 15 years for me to get my emergency fund up to scratch.

      Edit: of course, you can probably do it faster if you don’t have any emergencies while funding the account lol.

  • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    7 months ago

    I had 9 months saved in 2020. I’m taking out loans this month because it’s at zero. It’s been a hell of a ride. This economy is fucked though.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      51
      ·
      7 months ago

      Hey man, you live in a democracy. Go vote to change it. Oh wait. You can’t because you don’t live in a democracy.

      • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah! Take THAT person in an unfortunate situation. I bet you feel stupid for not having enough money to move, poor-y

      • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        You are so smart. Why don’t poor people just move to a democracy? Its only requires a bunch of money and sacrifice. Poor people should just abandon all of their friends, families, and connections by spending all of that money that poor people are known to have. That way they can live in a democracy and vote not to be poor, or whatever.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    In what universe is this even possible for most people? Because it’s not this one.

    • scoobford@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Its possible in this one, it just isn’t easy, takes a while, and generally isnt super pleasant.

      When people say to “live within your means”, they don’t mean “don’t spend more than you make”, they mean “save enough to maintain your financial security”.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      I was that person until mid 2019.

      Then some unexpected huge home expenses vaporized the emergency savings.

      Then COVID happened and I lost my job! TWICE! This was after being an engineer at the same company for 16 years. My shit was stable AF before it all started.

      Now I’m a much happier person with a much better job, but my finances are LOLfukt. Fortunately due to me trying to be careful in the past, I already owned a small cheap home in a reasonable COL area, so I can’t complain.

      • droans@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Now I’m a much happier person with a much better job, but my finances are LOLfukt.

        Not really; you just found out why an emergency fund is important.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Oh I extracted the full potential of my rainy day preparedness, no doubt.

          But the three things in that sentence still hold true. My finances are not fucked because of the better mental state and job, they’re just fucked all on their own due to recent history. But at least I can work on it now.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      If you stay home with your parents for a year or two, you’d get plenty of savings if you’re careful. I know I did.

      I know in more individualistic countries not moving out by 18 or 20s has traditionally been seen as taboo, but the current housing situation makes that traditional social rule very impractical for many. Besides, from what I heard in the USA, still living at home with parents is less stigmatised than before.

      • kiljoy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        My savings where wiped out buying a house. Now it’s fucking impossible between maintenance and god knows whatever else is flung at me.

      • Botree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Moving out at a young age is only a norm in just a handful of countries, mainly the English speaking ones. Reason being that they were more developed than the rest of the world, making it possible for them to move out when they turn 18. Poverty is a big reason why families are closer and live together for a much longer period. But many of these developed nations seem to be regressing these days, with more money flowing upwards than downwards.

        I agree though. The best time to move out is after you’ve worked and saved up enough for a down payment for your own place. Those few years are perhaps the best opportunity to save up that most of us may never get again.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I have about $10k socked away into an HSA account from when I had a high deductible insurance plan. With an HSA you can leave the money in an investment account, you don’t have to withdraw it when the cost occurs. You just need to have receipts for the amounts you withdraw so you can show them to the IRS is bed be. So I save all my receipts for doctors visits, prescriptions, OTC medicine, glasses, dental, and anything else allowed. Then I have tax free money sitting in an investment account that I can withdraw tax free if I have a real emergency.

      You can also put money into a Roth IRA and you can withdraw your contributions tax free.

      There’s a bunch of ways to make your money work for you and still have access to it in a true emergency.

      • Anamnesis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Lots of good reasons why someone might end up in debt. I got divorced and laid off. Dog needed $2k surgery to not have a terrible quality of life. Got a terrible staph infection on my chest after losing health insurance. This all happened in a four month period. I moved to a cheaper apartment, cut off any subscription aside from internet, which I need for two of my four jobs, got a cheaper phone plan, and mostly ate rice and beans every day. Still, it’s taken a year just to get back to zero.

  • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    I honestly think the “6 months of salary in an emergency fund”-advice is a bit overblown and certainly not universally applicable.

    An emergency fund must per definition be very liquid in order to fulfill its purpose, hence you can only really place the money in a simple savings account with a not-so-spectacular interest rate. This means that the opportunity cost of having 6 months of salary in an emergency fund is the delta of expected return on investment in a higher-yield method of savings, such as placing the money in index funds. This can be quite significant, in particular since saving up 6 months of salary is not an easy task for the average person.

    If you had the money placed in investments, the money would be less liquid, and there’s the chance that you may have to liquidate it during a downturn, which would of course suck a little. Consider carefully under which scenarios you would have to liquidate, though:

    • Lost your job? I have unemployment insurance to cover this scenario for me, meaning that I will get 80% of my current salary for close to a year, a period during which I would have to liquidate nothing.
    • Disaster strikes my home? My home insurance policy covers this more than enough for me.
    • Medical emergency? I’m lucky enough to live in a country where health care is free, but I have additional health insurance on top of that as well.
    • Emergency while traveling? I have great travel insurance. They cover all medical expenses and would even fly me back home post-haste in disaster scenarios.
    • Other accidents where I hurt myself? You guessed it, I have insurance for that too.

    Now, there’s an argument to be made that these insurance policies might be a bit slow to pay out, and that I might need to be a bit more liquid to cover the expenses temporarily. I have a solution for that too - credit cards. With credit cards I can make a short-term loan that should bridge over most issues until I can either get money from any of my insurance policies, or worst case have time to liquidate some of my higher-yield investments.

    So yeah, that’s my plan. It does not involve 6 months of salary being invested in a low-yield savings account, because that’d lose me a lot of money. I dislike the fact that the 6 months emergency fund is basically parroted as religious gospel, and it feels like people who repeat it have not thought about the issue thoroughly.

    • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You seem to be in a very unique situation. And to have a pretty good understanding of personal finance and of your risk appetite. What you say works for you and a few people that happen to have access to universal healthcare, what looks like four separate insurance policies, and that can manage not to fuck it up with credit cards.

      6 months liquid emergency fund remains the best strategy for most people out there.

      • XTL@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not a unique situation. It’s pretty much the average for millions of adult to middle aged people in several countries.

        Not nearly the norm globally but calling it unique is pretty ridiculous.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s a generalized thing that is healthy advice for most people, especially Americans who have very little of a social safety net.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Stocks and mutual funds are liquid enough to act as an emergency fund; you don’t need to rely on a savings account only to hold your emergency fund.

      • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        Would certainly suck if those six months worth of emergency fund had temporarily gone down to four months because of a downturn in the stock market though.

        Accidentally there might also be some correlation with stock markets going down, and an emergency happening. Eg large company laying staff off.

        That said you can do the math and see how much that money would return on average on etfs compared to a bank account, and decide if that’s worth the risk to you.

        Experts say no, I agree with them but I see your point, and it’s definitely worth to challenge these suggestions.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          The only way you can have your emergency fund invested is if you have a very good credit card which can cover all your expenses for a month or two. You can then reduce your emergency fund to one month’s worth so you can have cash if needed.

          • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I had an 18 month 0% card last year. I floated a bunch of expenses on it and paid it off a few days before interest kicked in. I also earned rewards points from the card, so double win I guess.

    • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Some say a good rule of thumb is 3–6 months of mandatory expenses depending on personal situations and it looks like you’re safe with the lesser amount.

      I usually hover around 3–4,5 months but have decided to increase a bit because of the current instability of everything

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      You could also consider a ladder of cds as an example, but then you either have to continually re-up 6 month cds or go for a year of them, each for about your monthly expenses.

      I just take the 4% interest (or whatever rapidly changing amount ally bank offers me on savings since they update a lot) and roll with it. For now it’s a similar ROI to renting a property without all the fuss of… Buying a property and doing the work lol.

    • Anamnesis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Man, where do you live where unemployment is nearly a year at 80% of your salary? When I was unemployed here in Washington, it was six months and more like 50% of my salary. And from what I understand, Washington is a lot more generous than most states.

      • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Sweden. You pay around $12 for the basic coverage which covers 80% of your salary up to a cap of around $2500 a month, for 250 working days. My union membership, which costs approximately $25 per month, then includes an additional coverage for if you go over the cap of $2500 a month for the basic coverage. These combined then cover you for income up to around $4500 a month. It’s also possible to get additional coverage on top of that to cover incomes above this amount through the union, again for around $12 a month.

        I’ve simplified the terms greatly, so in practice they are a bit worse - in particular, the compensation amounts get lower after a certain amount of days spent unemployed - but the general idea holds. To qualify, you need to have been employed already for a year, and you are required to look for work as a condition to get payouts on the insurance. You lose the right to payouts if you decline an appropriate job offer.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Multiple times now, I’ve had people on Lemmy tell me that I am either not caring about my future or not caring about my child’s future because I buy myself an occasional chai latte and her an occasional smoothie or some Taco Bell food.

    I hate this idea that you should deny yourself any and all pleasures in life so that you can have a decent 10-20 end-of-life years when you retire. People made fun of the avocado toast guy, but suddenly now he’s got the right idea?

    I’m not going to have major retirement savings if I put the maybe $20 a month at most that this costs and it makes our lives a little less miserable right now.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, generally agreed.

      I think more people should actually track what they’re spending, though. Sometimes what feels like “just $20 every once in a while” isn’t. A coworker of mine realized he was spending a lot more than he thought on fun food and drink when he actually added it up and put it in a spreadsheet.

      Not saying that’s you! But actually checking your spending in detail every once in a while I think is a good idea for everyone.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I definitely track spending. I’m just tired of people acting like that. I’m talking to someone in this very thread who is saying $7.99 for a Netflix account is not something you should pay for if you’re poor as if not spending $7.99 a month to make your life a little better would cover any medical bills or car repairs or anything else that might qualify as an emergency.

        Their reasoning was “I was poor once and I saved money and I did fine.” Too bad they mentioned that they had a color TV when they were poor, as if you could still even buy a black and white TV in the last 20 years.

        • ickplant@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          I really agree with you. There needs to be a balance between saving money and living your life.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I put $25/ week into a college savings account for my 4 year old. I do weekly for dollar cost averaging, rather than trying to time the market. I started it with a few $k and it’s up to about $5k right now. It’s tax deductible and is invested with a target date fund. Even if the investment only keeps up with inflation, that’s $25k or so in today’s money. Probably enough for at least a semester or two.

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Taco Bell used to be what you bought because it was dirt cheap. Is it supposed to be a luxury now?

  • Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m 38 and I just achieved that goal.

    Don’t stress about this shit (too much).

    Go to concerts, take trips, eat your avocado toast. Indulge.

    You’re only young once, and everyone is poor in their 20’s. Unless you’re lucky or it’s given to you.

    It sounds trite, but success will come. However you measure it.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I bet less than 25% of people actively do this. It’s not that easy to do lol

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      7 months ago

      True. But the meme is wrong. It’s expenses not income.

      The idea is you should be able to survive without working for 6 months.

      This is to cover losing your job, injuries, illness, family emergencies.

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        True. But the meme is wrong. It’s expenses not income.

        The idea is you should be able to survive without working for 6 months.

        Yeah, I get that, that’s why I meant I doubt that more than 25% of people can survive without working for 6 months. I don’t think more than 25% of people have more than 6 months of expenses saved up.

        • KimjongTOOILL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          56% of Americans don’t have enough to cover a $1000 unexpected bill. So I’d guess less than 5% have 6 months of expenses saved.

        • Landless2029@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I agree. I think is a mix of people living check to check (no choice) and bad education.

          I came from no money and learned financial planning skills from the internet.

          Now I’m at the point where I got an emergency fund and savings, but it took me years to get here.

          • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I don’t think it’s fair to blame it on bad education. I’m pretty sure almost everybody is aware that having emergency savings is better than not having emergency savings. The cost of living keeps going up, inflation rate going way up, but salaries are just not increasing enough to keep up. Everything is becoming more expensive and people can’t afford it, let alone having enough money to set aside for savings.

            • Landless2029@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              As far as bad education I’m referring to those growing up in poorer conditions.

              Parents that live check to check and have issues with making rent, feeding the family and maintaining basics like a car and home electricity.

              I grew up in this kind of environment. Financial responsibility starts at home. You follow your parents. Then at schools they dropped home economics. How to make a budget and not fall into debt.

              I got real lucky with outside support because I looked for it. I also know people who wouldn’t listen to me and used credit cards frivolously. Spending more than they earn over and over.

              Yes everything is worse today, but 10 and 20 years ago people still made stupid financial decisions due to capitalism and ignorance.

              The working class has been guided to farm wealth for the 0.1% for a long time.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I am 46 years old. I have never had enough to be able to survive without working for 6 months. Thank god for unemployment payments.

    • howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you can’t bring the savings side of the equation up, then bring the salary side down. Easy.

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s all fine but at 16 you don’t really have expenses.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I have a little more in my account today, but last week I had the fun of saying, “I have $36 in my bank account but I’m still richer than Donald Trump.”

      I still consider that a victory.

    • Syltti@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Could… C-Could this be one of my people? It is! It is one of my people, hello! \o/

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Yeah man I got it saved up and then some, I was able to stretch it 11 months without work most of last year. I got lucky.

    Nobody else I know has that luxury.