A German foundation has said it will no longer be awarding a prize for political thinking to a leading Russian-American journalist after criticizing as “unacceptable” a recent essay by the writer in which they made a comparison between Gaza and a Jewish ghetto in Nazi-occupied Europe.

  • Silverseren@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    264
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The hypocrisy of the Heinrich Böll Foundation (and the German government in general) is incredible.

    Here you have a Jewish person who is a journalist and a renowned political thinker who was being given the award for being someone who “reports on power games and totalitarian tendencies as well as civil disobedience and the love of freedom”.

    They 100% have the position, right, and accuracy to be comparing the state of Gaza currently to the WWII ghettos.

    Edit: Something else to note. The Foundation made this statement "“But Masha Gessen’s views should not be honored with a prize intended to commemorate the Jewish philosopher Hannah Arendt”.

    And I can’t help but laugh. Do they not know Arendt’s past stance on Israel? She was literally one of the first world-renowned Jewish anti-Zionists.

    She literally compared the Likud party to the Nazis!

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the real, actual cancel culture, and usual suspects are silent, as expected.

    • febra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do they not know Arendt’s past stance on Israel?

      Partly jewish, German citizen here. I’ll answer this for you. No, they don’t. They never worked out their own history. It’s all just teathre.

    • ShroOmeric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hannah Arendt would be punished as antisemite in today Germany. What a cesspool that country is becoming once again.

    • throwaway007@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Someone had commented that, in today’s Germany, she would not have received the award which is named after her own name.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    162
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hannah Arendt prize for political thought

    Genocide Expert Award Rescinded After Genocide Expert Compares Genocide To Genocide

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Huh, the IDF is currently pushing Gazans into smaller and smaller areas by not allowing them to evacuate through their lines and forcibly removing civilians who didn’t evacuate.

    They also plan to maintain the blockade they’ve had on the strip that heavily restricts people and material from moving.

    What historical parallel could there possibly be to this situation?

    Oh well. Better not listen to the guy who studied it hard enough to earn the award in the first place.

    • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, that award for political thinking? We’re taking that away because we don’t like the thoughts you’re having.

  • julianschmulian@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I‘m German, currently living in Switzerland and when I recently visited Germany I was appalled by the amount of unconditional support for Israel, for example a HUGE (maybe 10x10m?) israeli flag on the offices of the Grünen party and official posters calling for solidarity. I don‘t even think this is stemming from (however undifferentiated and misguided) historical considerations, rather than geopolitical considerations. Also on the subject of the article, I think that‘s a pretty apt and carefully done comparison.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel this really is because of plucking the historical guilt strings and “if you’re against Israel’s actions you’re an anti-semit”

      But I am not in the know of the local German situation, so might as well be a wrong impression

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      As just some asshole in America, the fierce blind support here seems to come from one of two places:

      1- good old racism. just like the Irish, Italian, etc before them, jews have their “white card” with the bigots especially when the “enemy” are darker.

      2- Religious nuts who think war around the holy land = the second coming and are going to root for anybody who keeps the war flowing.

    • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      What bothers me just as much is the Tagesschau app. It takes absolutely the same stance. There is no nuance. There is no objectivity. The reporting has a very opinionated view despite reading neutral.

    • SattaRIP@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, if history is indeed cyclical, then in a 100 years Palestinians will have their own ethnostate and oppressing a different peoples. My guess is Kurds. /s

        • pufferfischerpulver@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          In a 100 years it might, after our current world order has been consumed by the effects of unimpeded climate change. There’s hope yet for the Palestinians to have a go. /s

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’d think supporting the west supporting Nazi’s comitting genocide would never be doable anymore yet here we are.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In a couple decades we’ll pass a non binding resolution condemning the genocide of Gaza and pat ourselves on the back for doing the right thing. Then we’ll pass another military aid package for Greater Israel.

    • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      100 years from now the MENA region will be uninhabitable due to climate heating and I doubt that anyone will want to visit it in some spacesuit.

      • blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This time?

        America supports whoever we think will benefit us the most geopolitically lol. Israel is a centerpiece in the MENA which can’t really be ignored for how much pressure they put on their neighbors.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There hilarious thing is we’ve got way more invested in Iraq these days.

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve got some bad news.

        The US was fully prepared to support the Nazis right up until it looked like they’d probably lose the war.

        • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you have a source for that? I tried searching but didn’t seem to find what you’re referring to.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I call bullshit. Why was the US supplying weapons to all of Germany’s enemies starting in 1941 (months before Pearl Harbor)?

          Americans mainly wanted to avoid siding with anyone because they saw the war as a European conflict they didn’t need to be involved in.

          • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You’re right to call BS: I provided no supportive evidence. I’ll try to do so.

            The US “dealers of death” '(a precursor name of the military industrial complex) were happy to sell to anyone who was buying. Commercial support is only relevant as a source for lobbying.

            The (strictly non-interventionalist at the time) US government officially wanted to avoid involvement in a war as a belligerent. That doesn’t preclude sympathy within Congress or amongst the people for either side. The popularity of “America First” and Lindbergh in particular demonstrate that.

            Germany was compelled to declare war against the US because of Pearl Harbour, the US’ declaration was just reciprocation. The US, now busy in the Pacific, entered the European theatre only after operation barbossa barbarossa, noting that Germany had already made its fatal strategic blunder and was weakened from its battle of Britain defeat.

            The Wikipedia articles have good sources and are well edited. They’re a good place to find entry points into the histories.

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Everything you just said is correct as far as I know, but I don’t think it supports your original statement. The US was acting like Switzerland, which is scummy as hell when one side of a conflict is clearly in the wrong, but that doesn’t mean the US waited until Germany looked like it was losing. I’m not that much of a WWII scholar, but I was as a kid, and I wouldn’t say Germany was clearly losing until after the D-day invasion in mid 1944. That’s certainly the position assumed by popular portrayals of WWII, such as Jojo Rabbit and Downfall, to pick a US example and the one German one I know.

              • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I wouldn’t use Hollywood as a source. What sells well to the American public? America winning the war.

                In British media, it’s the battle of Britain.

                I imagine Soviet media would show it as operation barbossa barbarossa.

                But yes, scummy as hell.

                • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  True, it’s not a real source. But I think it says something when media from both sides of the conflict paint the same picture.

                • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Barbarossa. It’s Operation Barbarossa. And again, you continue to ignore the political reality that at least two giant constituencies in the US had very good reasons for not wanting to get into the European war. In a democracy, their views could not be ignored, no matter what others may have thought was the right thing to do. As I constantly find myself repeating to people on lemmy, winning an election doesn’t mean that you get to do anything you want, it means that you can probably do some of the things you want and will have to compromise on others.

        • Siegfried@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have more chances of going out with emma watson than the nazis had chances of winning that war.

            • Siegfried@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              My chances go getting out with emma* went down the hill after harry potter, i get your point and I think its pretty valid

              *point of reference is 2023

          • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They would have had a pretty damn good chance if they had stayed neutral with the soviet union. I don’t think even American involvement could have stopped them.

        • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bullshit. The pro-Nazi elements in the US were never anywhere close to being a majority and were never close to implementing pro-Nazi policies. At worst, the US government was guilty of remaining neutral and continuing to do business with Nazi Germany, but that’s a far cry from supporting the Nazis. This is pure revisionist tripe.

          It’s also worth mentioning that at that time the two largest ethnicities in the US were Irish and German immigrants or their immediate descendants. With the famine still in living memory and Irish independence still relatively recent, Irish-Americans were very leery of joining the war on the side of the UK, while German-Americans obviously weren’t necessarily keen on fighting the country from which they’d immigrated. These two constituencies were far too important to be ignored politically, and that’s a huge part of why it took the attack at Pearl Harbor for the US to do the right thing.

  • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    According to the German newspaper Die Zeit, which broke the story, the prize will still be presented to Gessen, though “in a different setting”, and on Saturday instead of Friday. It remains unclear who will present it, what they will be presenting and whether Gessen and other invited guests still plan to attend.

    In the paragraph the HBS draws attention to, Gessen wrote that “ghetto” would be “the more appropriate term” to describe Gaza, but the word “would have drawn fire for comparing the predicament of besieged Gazans to that of ghettoized Jews. It also would have given us the language to describe what is happening in Gaza now. The ghetto is being liquidated.”

    On X/Twitter, they wrote that no German media representative had tried to contact them, despite the story being widely reported in German media on Thursday.

    Supporters of Gessen, who is Jewish, and whose grandfather and great-grandfather were among family members murdered by the Nazis, have been quick to point out the irony of suspending a prize awarded in memory of Arendt, the German-born Jewish-American historian, philosopher and antitotalitarian political theorist who coined the phrase “the banality of evil”, in connection with the trial of leading Nazi Adolf Eichmann, which she covered as a journalist for the New Yorker.

    In an open letter written with Albert Einstein and other Jewish intellectuals in 1948, Arendt had, Gessen pointed out, even compared the Israeli Freedom party to the Nazis after they used racially motivated violence against civilians.

    “I am aware that this type of comparison, especially in Germany, is quickly seen as relativising the Holocaust. That’s why it’s so important to me that such a differentiated and intelligent thinker like Arendt didn’t shy away from this comparison,” Gessen told the newspaper.

    Referring to people in Germany being wary of challenging “the logic of German memory policy” for fear of being accused of antisemitism, they added: “The problem is that criticism of Israel is often seen as antisemitic, which I think is the real antisemitic scandal. This overlooks the actual antisemitism.”

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    On the bright side I really appreciate how many people speak out against Israel. I feel like their government has finally abused the “you’re either for us or antisemitic” card enough for people to stop caring about that bs.

    Truth is that government never really wanted peace and many Israeli didn’t either. Not that Hamas is any better. The point is there are no good guys here. Just idiots and criminals and civilians who are being slaughtered because of the former.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This time, with social media’s pervasiveness, the pro-Israel propaganda is tissue paper thin. People are absolutely coming to grips with the fact that Israel is engaging in broad daylight ethnic cleansing and genocide.

    • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not that Hamas is any better. The point is there are no good guys here.

      True. But if you saw a 20-year-old asshole beating the shit out of a 10-year-old asshole (even if the 10-year-old started it), you wouldn’t hand the 20-year-old a bat.

      • lunarul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The 10 year old didn’t even start it. His big brother started it, then retreated safely home to watch the 10 year old get pummeled. When someone finally intervenes and stops the fighting, the big brother will come out and sucker punch the 20 year old again, leaving the 10 year old to deal with the consequences. Again.

    • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      The resistance to the genocidal state is, by definition, a lot better than said genocidal state. Until such time as Israel ends their genocide, nothing Hamas does in retaliation will be unjustified. Hamas is the good guys, for exactly the same reasons America, USSR and UK were the good guys in WW2

      • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you’re confused. We’ve all been there, but your history is…a little off. Hamas aint the good guys, chief. We’re here to support average Palestinians. Hamas is a clusterfuck of geopoliticking and violence that only serves to further radicalize people. They’re not a solution to the violence.

        • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hamas is a solution to the violence in the same way the allies landing on Normandy was a solution. The only way to stop genocide is by killing a fuck ton of people, and Hamas is killing a lot of Israelis right now. If it kills a genocider, it is a good act. Hamas is only radicalizing people by stating the truth. They’re not the hero we deserve, but they are the hero we need right now.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s very very much like the Polish ghettos. You tell me, did Jews in Warsaw get put into an open air prison? Did Jews in Warsaw have their food and water and electricity taken away? Were the Jews in Warsaw allowed to leave the ghetto? Were the ghettos bombed and terrorized by Nazis?

  • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly what timeline are we on. I wonder if they’ve even asked themselves “are we the baddies?”.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    He’s not wrong. Been saying this since week 1 of this new stage of the conflict. Others have been saying this for decades.

  • ShroOmeric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    Germans learned nothing from their Nazi past. Still love censorship and still love to consider some lives more important than others. They’te just acting like an Israel’s colony now.

    • Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think Germany has actually accepted a lot more responsibility for the atrocities they’ve committed, compared to nearly every other European nation guilty of colonialism and genocide. I have British friends who were taught almost nothing about Britain’s colonial past in school, while every German has to learn about the Holocaust in school.
      In a way I understand Germany’s reluctance to compare a Jewish ethnostate to Nazism, considering what they did to the Jews 80 years ago. But I think that comparison is completely justified and Germany should know better. Israel is an apartheid state, and Netanyahu is one Auschwitz away from being just like Hitler.

      • ShroOmeric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They did accept responsability, but in itself has no value if they cannot raise their voices against another genocide that is happening right now. Totally agree with the res you say.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It still has value if it stops then from committing another genocide themselves. But yeah, they could be doing a lot better.

          • ShroOmeric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, it is not. Defending who commits genocide is not what you’d call a “stop”.

        • Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I completely agree. They know better than anyone what fascism looks like, and the fact that they choose to do nothing is sickening.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The lesson learned doesn’t seem to have been that killing large numbers of people because of their etnicity is bad, but rather that killing large number of Jews for their etnicity is bad, but doing it to members of other etnic groups who are still seen as untermenschen is fine.

        Basically (and forgive me the racist terminology but I think is representative) they’ve just reclassified Jews as “whites, like us” and carried on approving violent racism against those they see as “not like us”.

        Fascism might have been kicked out of Germany, but it seems to never have left the hearts of the German elites and many of its people.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    A German foundation has said it will no longer be awarding a prize for political thinking to a leading Russian-American journalist after criticising as “unacceptable” a recent essay by the writer in which they made a comparison between Gaza and a Jewish ghetto in Nazi-occupied Europe.

    In the paragraph the HBS draws attention to, Gessen wrote that “ghetto” would be “the more appropriate term” to describe Gaza, but the word “would have drawn fire for comparing the predicament of besieged Gazans to that of ghettoized Jews.

    At the time it stated that “as an analyst of decline and hope, Gessen reports on power games and totalitarian tendencies as well as civil disobedience and the love of freedom”.

    Supporters of Gessen, who is Jewish, and whose grandfather and great-grandfather were among family members murdered by the Nazis, have been quick to point out the irony of suspending a prize awarded in memory of Arendt, the German-born Jewish-American historian, philosopher and antitotalitarian political theorist who coined the phrase “the banality of evil”, in connection with the trial of leading Nazi Adolf Eichmann, which she covered as a journalist for the New Yorker.

    In an interview with Die Zeit published on Tuesday, Gessen spoke of the backlash Arendt had faced as one of Israel’s initial critics, warning against establishing a purely Jewish state in Palestine and in so doing excluding the Arab population.

    In an open letter written with Albert Einstein and other Jewish intellectuals in 1948, Arendt had, Gessen pointed out, even compared the Israeli Freedom party to the Nazis after they used racially motivated violence against civilians.


    The original article contains 760 words, the summary contains 266 words. Saved 65%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • jtk@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, if it wasn’t obvious a “prize for political thinking” that’s organized by a specific political party wasn’t total bullshit to begin with, it sure as shit is now.

  • roguetrick@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m sometimes fine and sometimes flabbergasted with this german response. Can anyone tell me if they teach about the germans killing roma people in concentration camps as they found them? The murder was mostly about one group of people, but there are things you can learn from other minorities being persecuted.

    I’m reminded of stories of muslim students resonating with jewish victims when visiting holocaust memorials, and being swiftly reprimanded for it by their white teachers. Because jews were the victims, muslims were not.

    I’m sometimes fine with it because, well, at least nobody in Germany is shooting fire extinguishers at menorahs like in Poland.

    • bunnyfc@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      yes they do (am German) but politicians are dancing on eggshells with Israeli behavior and the antisemitism-accusations

      imo, uncritically supporting what the Israeli government is doing hurts the rememberance of the Holocaust - how can you sell ‘never again’ when civilians have to suffer like this?

    • Shareni@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The murder was mostly about one group of people

      Funny how people focus on the final solution and completely ignore Lebensraum…