changing a provider is as simple as

making sure every single account you had that is tied to your email now points to a correct new one. And also informing every one of your contacts of the change, which is easier but also less efficient since half of them is going to miss the announcement and keep writing to an email that no longer exists

Oh, but ey wanted to be edgy and offensive

I feel like ‘a half is one-third more than a third’ is ambiguous and same as in ‘X is N% more than Y’ one may use X or Y as 100%

I’m sure that one interpretation is more common, but I don’t think that it is exclusively correct

Only surviving ones

Makes me wonder if that fascist regime would’ve fallen by the end of the 20^th century like the other fascist regimes in Europe

I sometimes feel like Ouija board is a better source than many, nowadays

Now trending 📈

Of course it is, now fall back in line, citizen!

Would be interesting to take a look through such a window.

But we could put ads during the new moon 🌑→🌚

I’m going to park my horse in the office then, good point

I think you should’ve put TL;DR in the beginning, otherwise it looked like you’re arguing cows don’t fart, when you were actually about net effect.

I never thought about it from this side, but it makes sense, and seems like another way big corporations fuck the world up.

Got it. I agree that their drivers are (were?) of exemplary bad quality

But I don’t think that it is realistically possible to drop all the proprietary firmware blobs, and if it’s not maybe it’s better to not actively sabotage something to ‘avoid those being feasible’?

Or in Puerto Rico, for that matter 🌚

Is there some sort of TL;DR if I don’t want to listen to him even for just 10 minutes?

I’m glad you asked, because this is what puzzles me, too

Early returns improve readability in that they make it simpler to read, but I also find them decreasing readability in that you may miss an early return and wonder why is execution not hitting the line you expect it to

If I understand correctly, each data-access structure represents single workflow, and you may have Transaction in that structure without the need for Arc<Mutex<…>> inside, but maybe you will need to wrap the structure itself with that.

What’s the reason to avoid binary blob drivers being feasible? Is that about not being able to use non-free binary blobs in kernel? I don’t quite understand what it even is about

It’s just time travellers from original timeline that tried to prevent it, and time travellers from the fucked up resulting timeline that returned to fix everything back to at least what it was