Subspace is the answer of course!

  • seaQueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Uh, no shit? That’s how light works once you’re able to travel at relativistic speeds - communication over interstellar distances using light is going to take ages.

    Even within our own solar system interplanetary travel will have significant communication time delays.

    Edit: also, we already know that matter and light can’t exceed c, but I wouldn’t be surprised if we discover that other forces (gravitation, or another that we haven’t understood yet) can transmit information at speeds >c. I wouldn’t be surprised if we turned to quantum entanglement for instantaneous communication over extreme distances either.

    • xkforce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      11 months ago

      Gravity travels at c. The Alcubierre drive tried to use bubbles in spacetime to “bend the rules” in order to result in apparent >c velocities but recent simulations indicate the bubble becomes unstable when attempting to exceed c.

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      My first thought was ‘no shit’ as well. There’s a horrible heartbreaking anime about that… Voices of a Distant Star.

      other forces … can transmit information at speeds >c

      I sadly disagree. Even if we figure out a way to instantaneously transport ourselves across the universe, there will be some shitty clause in fine-print that says we can’t go back, or it took 0 time for us but 1 billion years for everything else.

      Check out this video by Anton Petrov:

      https://odysee.com/@whatdamath:8/woah!-someone-just-sent-an-impossible:4

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        or it took 0 time for us but 1 billion years for everything else.

        That’s just time travel with extra steps!

      • Jamie@jamie.moe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        They’re probably referring to quantum entanglement, which affects the entangled particles instantly.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah but you can’t interfere with quantum entangled particles, if you do you break the entanglement. So it isn’t usable as a method of communication.

        • anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Something I’ve not been asked to get through my head about QE: If observing the entangled particle destroys the entanglement, doesn’t that mean we’d need “containers” of entangled particles to send a bunch of information?

          • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            You can’t send information with entangled particles. You just learn the state of the other particle by inference when you observe the first particle.

    • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Quantum entanglement is like ripping a photo in half, putting both halves in seperate envelopes and carrying them to opposite ends of the world.
      As soon as you open your envelope, you instantly know which half of the photo is on the other side of the planet - Faster Than Light Information Transfer!

      • xkforce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        For a variety of reasons, no information is actually transferred. Quantum entanglement can not be used to get around the limits imposed by relativity.

      • INeedMana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        So it’s not like: when I affect the hue (some attribute) of my half, the other half will change too? That has always been my understanding of it

    • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      The problem with information traveling ftl is, that you’re very quickly running into paradoxes. So just by logic wanting to keep intact, I feel like ftl communication will be impossible

      • justJanne@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        If you actually calculate the maximum speed at which information can travel before causing paradoxes, in some situations it could safely exceed c.

        For two observers who are not in motion relative to each other, information could be transmitted instantly, regardless of the distance, without causing a paradox.

        The faster the observers are traveling relatively to each other, the slower information would have to travel to avoid causing paradoxes.

        More interestingly, this maximum paradox-free speed correlates with the time and space dilation caused by the observers’ motion.

        From your own reference frame, another person is moving at a speed of v*c. The maximum speed at which you could send a message to that observer, without causing a paradox, looks something like c/sqrt(v) (very simplified).

      • bluGill@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Logically it makes sense, but the real world is years and often we don’t use the right logical systems. It makes logical sense to most people that a heavy object falls faster then a light object ,but we know that is false (and a also a non obvious logical system that also shows it is false)

    • Jamie@jamie.moe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      By the time we invent any sort of lightspeed travel, we’ll have long conquered quantum entanglement. If you have a signal transferred over a properly quantum entangled technology, the signal would transfer instantaneously.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Another option would be tiny temporary Einstein Rosen bridges. Sure the energy requirements would be hideous, but if we’ve figured out how to exceed C, I don’t think we really care about energy costs anymore.

    • BaronVonBort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I feel like once we can crack the code of being able to break the laws of physics with FTL travel, we can probably also break the laws of physics with communications as well, just saying.

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Somebody just watched the Expanse for the first time and thinks it’s a neat new thing to explain to the Earthers

      • crystenn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        i knew the expanse would pop up somewhere in the comments! been working my way through the books and it’s great!

      • zzx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Is it weird that I’ve only ever read the books? I didn’t even know there was a show until recently. Is it any good?

        • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s fairly good. Some things are a bit abridged for the sake of action and visuals. Like travel that takes weeks is sometimes happening within hours or days.

          However the dialogue, writing and characters are pretty good. It did lack a bit in season 6 (the last one) but that’s because the material wasn’t there yet in the books and somehow it cuts things short with material from book 6 at best.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It might become like the days of sail. The fastest mode of communication might actually be the speed of ships. In order to get a message between earth and alpha centauri you might have to actually build messenger ships.

    You might have to build small automated FTL capable ships with massive data storage capacity and then download all of the data you need to send and then set the ship off on its way.

    • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Star Citizen has a ship like that. A cabin strapped onto the largest engine that wouldn’t kill you, with data storage added almost like an afterthought.

      Well, star citizen has a ship like that - it doesnt have any gameplay loops that make use of that though.

    • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      The futuristic version of never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 months ago

    Who would have thought that Doppler could apply to communication equipment, too! Shocking!

    Next they are going to tell us that messages might take some time due to c!

    • Arin@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      imo by the time we have lightspeed ships we may have faster ways to send info, imagine back 2000 years ago and we tell people we can communicate faster than the speed of sound

      • Cosmicomical@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Now i’m visualizing a world where long distance communication is done with sound and you have screaming pipes across the continent

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah but physical objects also can’t move faster than the speed of light so in any scenario where that’s possible we’ve obviously either found a workaround or we were fundamentally wrong about some part of physics.

          Maybe we have access to wormholes and we can just send radio waves through the wormholes Stargate style.

          • perviouslyiner@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            problem with wormholes is that you can send information into the past - so if you receive a message, does that mean you’re predetermined to subsequently send that message?

          • orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            well, any going faster than light will have to utilize the bending of space-time, if it ever happens and the wormhole thing has even more problems

        • paradiso@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Quantum entanglement? (forgive me if dumb thought, quantum physics is magic to me)

          • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Quantum entanglement can’t transfer data. As soon as you try to use the connection you break it.

          • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Quantum entanglement is like this - you have two sealed envelopes. In one envelope the letter A is written on a sheet of paper and the other has a sheet of paper with B written on it. No one knows who has which envelope until it is opened. All opening the envelope does is let you know what is written on the piece of paper the other person has. It transfers no data between the two points as the data was already set.

          • orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            doesn’t work, “reading” the entangled particles causes them to change state, thus you can’t know if it changed as part of sending a message, or just because you were reading it.

            • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              There is no “sending” The data was set when the particles were entangled. All you’re doing is moving a particle from point A to point B.

              • orrk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                the data is still being “sent” according to the field of information sciences.

                not that it changes anything about the physical impossibility

        • arin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Speech can’t go faster than the speed of sound, sound waves… But then comes telephone networks

          • orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            to be fair, it’s still both slower than the light signals that were then as are now the fastest possible form of data transfer.

            saying “but someone might invent something” doesn’t mean shit to physics, it’s why we can always with confidence say that Perpetumobile are impossible

              • orrk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                no, I don’t think I am, unless you want to make the argument that infinite free energy is just 1…n brilliant inventor(s) away

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Maybe if we have faster than light travel we can assume that we’ll have a faster way to transmit data. It’s possible there will be a transitional period where we move at subluminal speeds and can transmit data at superluminal speeds, but I don’t think being able to hit the speed limit ourselves will imply that we can break it with data.

        Plus relativity will really fuck with things if we are able to reach the speed of light. Time dilation will reduce bandwidth from the perspective of the stationary observer because they need to sync up with a clock that will appear to get slower and slower. Maybe some kind of warp technology will avoid this, but if it doesn’t, this will apply even if the signal can be transmitted instantly.

        I’ve become resigned to the likelihood that if we ever do get out of this solar system, it will either be unmanned probes (like the ones we’ve already sent, which are still debatable as to whether we can consider them outside of it or not yet; they’ve passed the heliopause but haven’t gotten to the Ort Cloud yet), or they will be effectively independent branches of humanity that will diverge and become their own thing over time. We’ll be in contact (assuming both sides survive), but it will be more like pen pals where messages take years to arrive and meeting up in person is impossible. The ship will travel for generations before arriving at its destination with a good chance that they’ll just die on the way or shortly after getting there unless they are prepared for further generations of terraforming moons and planets in the new system.

        And with our current situations, even that seems unlikely. I’ll be impressed if we see a self-sustainable moon colony or space station during our lifetimes or asteroid belt mining.

        • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          AI will beat us out of the solar system by far. They’ll pack themselves up in Von Neumann probes and go to all the nearby stars at the same time. Then go on to the next furthest stars and on and on and on with some taking the plunge and venturing into the intergalactic void heading to another galaxy.

          Our best bet would be to hitch a ride as DNA data. It will be modified on site to survive whatever world they come across, and then grown in tanks. They’ll be raised by robots or AI in similar bodies to that of the new humans.

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not a surprise, it’s just a concern being presented because it’s not a thought for the average person.

      • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        isn’t developing light speed spacecrafts a far more direct concern?

        why even concern about communications when travelling such distances isn’t even possible.

        I don’t see the point of the article.

  • Deebster@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Most people have missed the bit about time dilation messing up the clocks used in signalling, which I thought was interesting at first. However, surely the fix is just as simple as including a timing signal with the transmissions?

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yeah we solved this problem in the 50s by including a clock signal in some form with the data. Most modern digital communications use it.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      If nothing else, you discovered a way to gloss over the impossible thing in a bad scifi movie. “No it works because we added a timing signal!”

  • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    There was an early 2000s anime movie that explored this idea. It was called Voices of a Distant Star.

  • Lophostemon@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is why Jesus invented ‘two cans and a piece of string’.

    Dammit, I’m not even a trained physicist but I still have to do all the thinking around here.

    • Alex@feddit.ro
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Jesus Christ, why’d this get so downvoted? Do people not get sarcasm?

      • ExLisper@linux.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I was actually wondering what would happen if you would just put a big rod of metal in 0 g and pushed it? If one end shifts 1 cm, how long would it take for the other end to also shift? Wouldn’t that be instant? Well, apparently the signal would travel at the speed of sound. Which is weird, right? It makes sense but it’s still weird.

        • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s mechanical, so each atom is pushing against the ones immediately next to it, and so on, until other end moves.

          It would be interesting to work out how much a metal bar the length of our solar system would compress when you push it…

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      What’s the propagation speed of vibrations through carbon nantubes? I’ve done no math or experiments and believe this is the answer. I pull on it at Alpha Centauri, it instantaneously pulls a receiver at Sol. I’d say a vat of liquid nylon with a thread pulled and dragged but that sounds sticky.

        • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Does a lower frequency signal travel the same speed? 1hz? I suppose it would be the same because the tether would have immense mass over it’s length. So even though I’m picturing an impractically long tether moving as one solid length to tap slow morse code, the mass would be unfathomably high and therefore inducing significant stretch. That’s without getting into vibration kinetic energy being lost to heat along the way

          I’m obviously not genuinely proposing this. It’s just a brain exercise.