this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
171 points (98.9% liked)

World News

38978 readers
2818 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Taiwan’s government is closely monitoring reports that SpaceX has requested its Taiwanese suppliers to relocate manufacturing to countries like Vietnam and Thailand due to “geopolitical” concerns, specifically potential conflict with China.

Taiwan's Economic Affairs Minister JW Kuo expressed confidence in Taiwan’s resilient supply chain but acknowledged the situation.

The request has sparked anger in Taiwan, with some accusing Musk of being ungrateful for local suppliers. The incident has also garnered attention in China, with some praising Musk’s foresight regarding China’s unification goals.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But with who? Trump isn't going to go up against Putin and Putin and Xi are allies, so he won't go up against Xi either.

Much easier for all of them to turn a blind eye to each other for the foreseeable future with three authoritarians in charge.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So you're imagining a stable power vacuum as the greatest superpower in history willfully shrinks due to the leadership of a foreign asset?

Respectfully, why?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, I said what I was imagining:

I think Trump will create Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia. No point in having a war with each other if you can just take whatever territory the other two don’t want and the other two won’t interfere.

There is no power vacuum there.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just don't see how that translates to the game board as it stands without a world war ensuing. There are enough nuclear powers in the world that someone is popping off before we get there.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not interfering with each other would mean no war with each other.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

A three-sided Cold War that stays cold has been the goal for a while. America has agreed.

Three bullies dragging the world along while they control their people and other nations with fear and the promise of economy.