• sergih@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 minutes ago

    This guy is already implying that youll like it better if 3 randoms die as 1 loved one, he’s choosing for you already in the explanation 😭😭😭

  • BenLeMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    51 seconds ago

    There is no such thing as an “amount of people”. It’s “number of people”. And the question given is basic game theory, just worded to be nasty.

  • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    This is only superficially a prisoner’s dilemma. In a true one, you cannot get a better result for yourself no matter what the other person does, but here if you assume the other person pulled the lever, there is no reason to pull the lever yourself.

    To fix this, you can have 4 relatives on the trolley, and 5 of the opposite faction way back on the middle track. Both do nothing, 1 relative of each is killed. One guy switches the lever, their relatives are all fine, other guy loses 5. Both switch, crash with all 8 relatives on the trolley dead.

    • TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I see what you’re trying to do and you’re not necessarily wrong, but you’re kinda perpetuating the attitude that inspired someone to make this meme in the first place

        • TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Touche. But no, my point was more of a haphazard reflection on how both the Trolley Problem and Prisoner’s Dilemma are (by design) built on the idea of reducing human life and/or morality and empathy down to a math problem. It is a method of thought that has its purposes, sure, but I think too many people make that their default setting, which makes dehumanization more commonsublllif subconsciously. Idk man, I’m going through some stuff

          • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Given that this problem is given during corporate interviews … it probably screens for the requisite level of sociopathy.

  • Peck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Well obviously you should pull the lever once the front wheels past the split but before the rear wheels cross it, so that trolley gets off the rails. This way everybody has the chance to survive and you have defensible position during inevitable court hearing.

    • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Are the 5 people on the opposong trolley worthy of death? Will killing them outweigh losing my loved ones?

      Or is the one loved one ill save my really hot 1st cousin?

      Because with the rest of the family dead, we can live happily ever after without any annoying incest complaints.

  • somewhathinged@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    If you think about this for any length of time and actually imagine this scenario, you realise you don’t pull the lever and it’s not even close.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Wrong. You pick the obviously wrong moral stance and then aggressively yell about it on the internet. The more obvious it becomes that you are wrong, the louder you yell. This protects your ego from introspection.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      that right, I’d masturbate on the tracks and on the people tied to the tracks so they are slipery and can slide or bounce to safety. And before you judge me, its the only thing I’m really good at and we should make the most of what we have in life.

      Failing that for whatever reason (or maybe in addition to that), I’d asses which of the prospects are lefties and make sure those people in particular live. Sorry centrists and republicans, but we need the votes and some people have to die, but I’m focussed on doing the least harm here.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      You realize this is your family watching you make the decision to have their vehicle run over a loved one? There’s a possibility they all live if you pull it.

      • Famko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Or if you pull it, then they see you make the decision to risk their lives to kill three other people.

        What is better, three lives lost or one life lost?

      • TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        You need to watch more shows. Don’t get me wrong, I like The Good Place and what they were trying to do with it, but yeah no there’s a lot of other shows that are just as educational and well written that don’t have to do a show-wide reset to start every season

      • bananabenana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Lmao what. Sure it covers philosophy 101, but not as smart as say, Dark, Mr Robot, Better Call Saul, Watchmen etc.

          • bananabenana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 minutes ago

            Yo shhhh, keep it down!!! Rick and Morty is hidden sigma knowledge only. You can’t be sending virgin minds directly to the smartest goatest show of all time like that without any brain training and a Duolingo accreditation of at least 5 languages. Remember what happened to Prometheus? Yeah that will be you if you don’t keep it on the down low.