• wanderer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    There was no hurry. It could have been captured and released back in Greenland, but Iceland won’t do that because of the cost, so they just kill it. How much would you be willing to contribute to prevent a polar bear from being killed?

    • Index@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      No hurry? The woman in the cabin that spotted the bear was just a wooden door or a glass window away from the animal.

      Also, Greenland doesn’t want them back, they even shoot the bears on sight if they are too close to human settlements. They do however have a quota and each bear that is killed in Iceland contributes to this quota.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      There was no hurry.

      How do you know? Please show me a map of where it was found in relation to places where people live.

      It could have been captured and released back in Greenland

      How do you know this was actually doable? Why do you think the polar bear would survive being dropped off in a random place?

      but Iceland won’t do that because of the cost

      And they should be forced to bear a cost burden they can’t afford?

      • wanderer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        How do you know?

        The articles I have read only say that the woman saw it outside her house. There was no indication that it had attempted anything other than rummage through garbage. And the police had to travel about 30 km by boat to get there, so the response time couldn’t have been quick

        Please show me a map of where it was found in relation to places where people live.

        Well, another article says it was in Höfðaströnd There are only a few buildings there and spread far apart, so the only relevant person is the one woman.

        How do you know this was actually doable?

        They attempted it before so they thought it was doable. There was a commission to decide how to handle polar bears in the future and all they said was that it cost too much.

        And they should be forced to bear a cost burden they can’t afford?

        It didn’t say that they couldn’t afford it, just that they wouldn’t pay for it. (You keep rephrasing things in a way that was not intended to try to make your position stronger. That’s called a strawman argument. You should stop that.) And they seem to be getting a lot of complaints from Icelanders that are upset that they killed the bear, so it probably wouldn’t be forced, but something that many Icelanders would be willing to pay.