this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
618 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

59192 readers
2389 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 188 points 1 month ago

Oh no, now we have to ban them all?? What a shame!

/s

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 103 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But you can't charge me with murder! That guy committed it too!

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago (3 children)

selective enforcement of the law is a real issue. One of the reasons Donald Trump will likely never go to jail is the failure to prosecute nixon, reagan (iran contra, iran hostage crisis meddling), and Bush/Cheney(wmd fiasco)

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

And one of the reasons POC are more likely go to jail (or even gets shot) for something a white man would be let free with only a warning… At least in the “free” land.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The argument here is more along the lines of, "you can't make a law that defines something as murder only when I do it."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 82 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'm surprised so many people think this is a good argument. TikTok is a social media platform. Temu is an online marketplace. The potential to cause disruption within US society is completely different.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago (14 children)

Legally it is a very good argument. A law targeting a single company in name or effect is literally unconstitutional. It's called a "Bill of Attainder".

The counter argument is indicting Facebook because they never stopped selling information directly to the CCP.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (12 children)

Cool, let's ban Temu then. Nothing of value will be lost.

In all honesty though, I disagree with banning software, and that includes TikTok. I think it's a terrible platform and I refuse to use it, but I think we need to solve the underlying problem another way, otherwise we're just picking and choosing what speech is allowed in this country. The Constitution doesn't only protect American citizens, it protects everyone.

That said, if we're going to ban one, let's ban them all. These apps haven't provided any tangible value IMO and they've arguably caused a fair amount of harm, so I'm not going to die on a hill defending them.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 64 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It's time to start taxing the acquisition, retention, and selling/trading of personal data.

Actually, that time was 40 years ago.

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Google and Microsoft would be scrambling to pay off every single person associated with that before it ever hit the first courtroom floor.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

GDPR is a start, but we need to actually ban it, not just annoy people until they click Accept at the 20th popup of that tantalising offer to share your details with 1473 trusted data partners.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

ohhh data collection taxation, I like it. You would think it would be a no-brainer but look at marijuana taxation and the continued resistance to rake in all that public funding. Would make most of the controversy around AI disappear if they tax it's collection.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] noxy@yiffit.net 42 points 1 month ago

US tech companies too, you fucking cowards.

Facebook paid kids to install a VPN client on their smartphones so they could intercept AND DECRYPT traffic between competing services (like Snapchat, Amazon, Youtube)

facebook and any other company they acquire (or however they try to rebrand) are not only untrustworthy but active adversaries against common decency and basic privacy

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 41 points 1 month ago (10 children)

America selectively caring about privacy.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (8 children)

The concern isn’t that these companies have microtargeting data. The concern is about what these companies could use that data for.

An off-brand t-shirt site would be a fairly ineffective vehicle for political propaganda. Tik Tok would be great at that.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SteveDinn@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

TikTok is correct. Ban them all.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

While i dislike tiktok as much as the next one, please do temu first. Temu might actually be the downfall of our planet that is already falling down the stairs pretty hard.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I knew someone who got caught up in their ~~pyramid~~ marketing scheme. The prizes were some low quality shit. The watch they won got badly scratched and the wristband's pin fell off the same day from regular use. It was pretty funny watching it disintegrate in real time.

[–] SteveDinn@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I abhor those Temu YouTube ads.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're right, we should regulate or ban then too.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Technically, the second partof that bill bans sending user data to China for all companies, so it's foreseeabke that they get fined into the dirt if nothing else.

I hope the Facebook multi-billion dollar fines act as precedent.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] twig@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 month ago

So ban them too

[–] Rob200@lemmy.autism.place 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is a good point actually. That's almost like trying to ban Naruto because it's Japanese, but not banning Dragonball Z. We'l see where this goes. If they would enforce these law equally it wouldn't be as much of a concern. Overall, whether they ban TikTok or not, if as a user you don't like a said platform, just don't use it.

[–] revv@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Yes and no. Without endorsing them, the arguments for banning Tik Tok are subtler than Chinese = security risk. The fears, however reasonable you may find them, are largely that it presents a danger of foreign information gathering of detailed behavioral/location/interest/social network information on a huge swath of the U.S. population which can be used either for intelligence purposes or targeted influence/psyops campaigns within the U.S. When you look at the history of how even relatively benign data from sources not controlled by foreign adversaries has been used for intelligence gathering, e.g. Strava runs disclosing the locations of classified military installations, these fears make a certain amount of sense.

Temu, et al., on the other hand are shopping apps that don't really lend themselves to influence campaigns in the same way (though, if they are sucking up data like all the other apps, I wouldn't be surprised if folks in the U.S. security apparatus are concerned about those as well.

Ultimately, I think the argument fails because it assumes an obligation for Congress to solve every tangentially related ill all at once where no such obligation exists.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

They desperately need to do something about car software before China starts being really relevant here in EVs too.

I absolutely support massively restricting what anyone can gather, not just China, (and the same for social media/ad networks/retailers), but it's fundamentally not the same threat as data vacuums controlled by an enemy state.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I generally think that TikTok sucks but do agree with this argument. It’s silly to say that domestic companies can be evil but foreign ones no.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

That's not a silly argument if your argument is about national security. For the exact same reason, China blocks almost all western apps. It gives a potential route for whatever nation is considered hostile to influence your population, and TikTok has actually activated this influence at least once directly. They tried to activate their users to protest congress from passing laws restricting them.

Basically, they have the ability to influence users, and they also have the will to do so as they've already shown. In what world eould they not be a national security threat? It's also really hard for me to accept this argument from a Chinese company when China has the great firewall to "protect" it'd citizens from outside influence.

You can argue that it is not to benefit the citizens and rather just the state, which is fair. You can't reasonably argue that the state has nothing to fear.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

Tiktok is probably used 10 times as much though (users x time on the app) and Temu isn't spreading messages in quite the same way. Comparing apples and gerbils, whataboutism, etc.

[–] Syntha@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

The argument isn't that they're "evil", it's that they could be used as tools by strategic rivals.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Like Temu?

You mean like facebook and twitter.

[–] TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No, they love those, since that data goes to the US government instead of to the CCP

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

that data goes to the US government instead of to the CCP

Going to blow people's minds when they find out Temu data also goes to the US government and Facebook data also goes to the CCP.

This shit is just a commodity. It's auctioned off at the bid rate. The NSA doesn't just lay claim to this data, it buys it. And these Big Data companies are only handing it over because of the absurd margins NSA (and MI5 and the rest of the Five Eyes) directors are willing to pay.

Your data isn't any safer because the parent company is owned by a foreign plutocrat. This is a big club and you ain't in it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 23 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Is tiktok saying that all Chinese apps that steal our data are also stealing our data because they were designed to steal our data?!

I am SHOCKED.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You don't even need the word Chinese

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago (6 children)

TikTok literally got people to commit check fraud

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

TilTok likely got my car stolen (Hyundai vulnerability trended on TikTok)

[–] dan@upvote.au 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's Hyundai/Kia's fault though. For whatever reason, they cheaped out and didn't include an immobilizer in 2011-2022 models (meaning the cars don't actually verify that there's a key in it, so you can just remove the key hole and turn the ignition with a screwdriver or USB cable or whatever to start it).

Before TikTok, this would have just spread on different platforms...

I'm not defending TikTok though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 15 points 1 month ago

Please ban them, I beg of you, please...

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 15 points 1 month ago

Temu isn't a social media network that has been known to boost specific narratives with their algorithm. The U.S. isn't saying that China can't sell and market to the American audience, just that they'll need a supervisor if they want to mess with media.

[–] Cyberjin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Yeah, better ban them all, don't see why not

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I mean. Why not?

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago
[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] don@lemm.ee 24 points 1 month ago

A Chinese-owned fast fashion hazwaste app

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

AliExpress clone but you can only use it after installing their app on your phone.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fisher said that Americans have a "fundamental interest" in working with the publisher or editor of their choice

Bruh. Did you really just throw away all of your Section 230 protections?

Game on, motherfucker.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›