this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
40 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59192 readers
2389 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

"The United States had previously unilaterally regulated those tools as part of its campaign to restrict access to advanced technology by Chinese chipmakers who could contribute to Beijing's technological and military advances."

Reads that the US refused to let them export the machines to China because they had "some" US parts. The Netherlands intends to stop the US from having a say in the matter.

Sounds reasonable.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Chinese chipmakers will be able to produce chips at the 7nm, 5nm and eventually 3nm technology levels using DUV tools -- better than limits set by Washington.

However, chipmakers using the technique will suffer ever-worse yields, making that a demonstration of engineering prowess but economically unviable

GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES!

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are you referring to the Chinese, American or Dutch government to whom the subsidies will be offered?

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The answer is literally the first word of the part I quoted.