this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
1251 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59166 readers
2125 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 502 points 3 months ago (124 children)

No shit. Now do Amazon, apple, meta, Microsoft, Disney and all the food conglomerates. Then it will have been a good start.

[–] cranakis@reddthat.com 167 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They've got Amazon in the works

Amazon

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 87 points 3 months ago

Would be nice if we didn't let them kill off so many other businesses first before doing something about it.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 117 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 74 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Too big to fail financial industry should go first.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 43 points 3 months ago

oil, pharma... most of all critical aspects of every day life is controlled by oligopolies

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chemicalprophet@lemm.ee 62 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] dan@upvote.au 36 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

I still don't understand how the Californian government bailed them out when they were bankrupt, yet they were allowed to remain an independent company? Why didn't the government take full control?

Electricity in cities in the Bay Area that have their own municipal power company (like Palo Alto and Santa Clara) is literally 1/3 the cost of PG&E.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

FUUUUUUUUUUUCK PG&E

Fuck them. If there was ever a case to be made for government owned utilities (and like why is that even a debate in the first place?) these assholes would be the poster child.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 54 points 3 months ago

Cable companies too please.

load more comments (120 replies)
[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 212 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is a big deal, but just a reminder that this is the District (trial) court, so the next step would be the Circuit Court of Appeals, followed by an appeal to the Supreme Court. There may be some intriguing injunctions that come out of this, but we're years away from a final disposition.

For the curious, this one came out of the DC Circuit, informally known to be the most technically and administratively savvy circuit, as it deals with a LOT of nitty gritty stuff coming out of Federal agencies.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 51 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I was about to comment that this is going to be appealed, and unless something changes with SCOTUS, my money is in it being reversed to some degree.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 32 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

depends on when it hits the supreme court, for sure.

didn't someone just say google was 'very bad' and should be 'shut down'? ...someone that helped stack the court to its current composition?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 106 points 3 months ago (8 children)

this is why it's silly that people are mad at mozilla for buying a privacy friendly ad company to try and break the monopoly.

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 64 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Its seriously absurd. I hate ads, but there's realistically not a better option to profit when providing free software and services like Mozilla is doing. Investing into ads that don't violate your privacy is a great decision. I don't know what the hell people want from them.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

They want them to meet all of their impossibly high and contradictory standards at the same time. For free. What's so hard about that?? /s

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (8 children)

They should do it like Signal: accept donations. Signal is doing just fine. But Mozilla cannot legally do that as they are a for-profit company. And Mozilla Foundation won't do that either because they are funded by Mozilla and under their command.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Fades@lemmy.world 86 points 3 months ago

FUCK YEAH!!! NOW BREAK THOSE BASTARDS UP!!!!

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 63 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fine: About $3.50

Punitive damages: lol

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

The fine isnt important, its if any breaking up of the company comes of it

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 62 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

Oh boy, can't wait for this one to be thrown out by our totally not rigged, definitly for the people supreme Court.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Clarence Thomas needs a new RV, which one will google buy him?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] iamtrashman1312@lemmy.world 54 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Cool, now actually enforce that judgment

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

America needs to pick up the old ways and start going after monopolies with a sledge hammer to break them into tiny pieces again.

and pass laws that don't let them pull an ATT and buy back all their fragments and recongeal into an even bigger, more dangerous monopoly than it was before like some kinda fucked up liquid metal terminator of capitalism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prosp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Maybe we should not let companies to work in a lot of areas. For example Amazon, SaaS IaaS Paas Ecommerce, ARM processors, among others. Maybe we should contain megadiversified enterprises??

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] anticurrent@sh.itjust.works 43 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Mark my words! the outcome of this will be like a mountain giving birth to a mouse.

Microsoft came out of such antitrust lawsuit unscathed and a decade later went back to pushing its browser down everyone's throat.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago (3 children)

A mountain giving birth to a mouse? Is that a translation from another language? I'm not being critical, it's just oddly specific and bizarre.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee 43 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Okay, now loop in reddit's bullshit exclusivity agreement to search results and make it so no one can favor any one search engine crawler or demand payment to be shown in search. If your content is publicly accessible it should be fair game to all.

Most companies will want their site to show up on other search engines but they knew what they were doing, you only search for it on google to find results because google's own are an SEO ad riddled mess.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Electric_Druid@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago

Finally, some good fucking news

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Might not do much for the upcoming Manifest v3 doomsday but at least the current government recognises the ills of big tech as it currently stands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 32 points 3 months ago

we have so many freaking monopolies now a days. we really need to keep companies from owning so much. bring back the media limits and no company should be able to own multiple areas of healthcare and such.

[–] Jocker@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 months ago

Nice.. Now do it.. Break them

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

But there is an alternative, search engines that say that are independent but then come crashing down when Bing goes down, which belongs to another convicted yet still existing monopoly.

load more comments
view more: next ›