Technology

59192 readers

2452 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

287

Meta to pay Texas $1.4 billion for using facial recognition technology without users’ permission. (www.texastribune.org)

submitted 3 months ago by ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Lodra@programming.dev 73 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I like that Meta is fined for this bad practice. But why are they paying the state? How does this help anyone that was actually victim of the facial recognition?

I can see an argument based on how state funds help state residents. But it still doesn’t really feel right to me.

A real tangential thought: What if fines claimed by the state didn’t increase the states fund? What if those funds reduced the tax burden of residents from the bottom up?

[–] ExcursionInversion@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Maybe they could use the funds on the freedom grid so fewer people die this winter

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

Why become a corrupt state AG if not to get people to pay you metric assloads of money?

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I'd be good with it since I don't have a FB account and so I get some benefit from them getting their PPs slapped. Because frankly, I have zero sympathy for anyone who still has a facebook account.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 44 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is one of the best cases of “When one of the worst cunts you know of makes a really good point.”

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

i'd wager it's more about paxton trying to let zuckerberg know who's boss, and that he'd better toe the line if he wants to stay in business

the notion that ken paxton actually cares about commoners' privacy is, um...sus

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

This sounds like an excellent law so it is shocking as fuck that it came out of Texas.

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

From that title I thought Meta is going to pay Taxes $1.4b for the right to use facial recognition withou asking its users.

[–] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Tomato / tomato.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago

Paxton with Clarence Thomas in a private jet to Tahiti: “got ‘em!”

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When I read Paxton, I knew it wouldn't be good for the people

[–] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

When I read Paxton, I was pleasantly surprised.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is this going to Texans or is it just going straight to the budget?

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

At best it'd go towards property tax relief so the rich would benefit the most and renters get fuck nothing.