this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
66 points (89.3% liked)

News

23259 readers
3386 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Is it lying about it? I bet it's lying about it.

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Secret sauce is nuclear.

Fallout.

[–] blahsay@lemmy.world -5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They produce more pollution than anyone.

[–] Deway@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

There are something like 1.2 billion people living in China and the rest of the world has moved a ton of manufacturing there, of course the country produce more pollution than any another. But per capita, they are not number one. Here's the carbon dioxide production per capita for the entire world. Other type of pollution will obviously by different but I'm not sure they are first per capita in any category.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Both the US and China should be held accountable and you should make excuses for neither. We all know coal is the dirtiest fossil fuel, and China still consumes over 50% of the entire world's yearly coal. China is responsible for the largest share of CO2 emissions each year by far, and only China can take action to change that, regardless of any per capita measure

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

While I don’t want to be an apologist for China, you might pay attention to the pace of their renewables buildout, and their plans. Also consider quality of life where at the same time they are providing power to millions of new customers

Most importantly, we’re criticizing them because they are one of very few countries that are ahead of their commitment? Or are we criticizing them for being in pace with the rest of the world combined? There are far more worthy issues to criticize China for: can’t we be happy with the win?

[–] Deway@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I live in a small European nation with ~11m inhabitants. We are phasing out nuclear energy and opening.... Natural gas power plants. Our emissions will go higher because of that. At the same time, China is lowering its emissions of GHG. Yes, we will still produce less pollution than a country with literally more than 100x people living in it, but individually, we will produce more than the average Chinese citizen. Should countries produce the same amount of GHG regardless of size? Do we expect Germany to be on the same level as Luxembourg? China is a semi dictatorship that's committing Genocide and produces a lot of pollution but we can't ignore that its size plays a role in that.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 0 points 3 months ago

At the same time, China is lowering its emissions of GHG.

No they're not, they're increasing both renewable and hydrocarbon-based energy production. The US is actually lowering CO2 emissions, having peaked in 2007 and trending lower every year since. We should celebrate China investing in low or no carbon technologies, but don't give them more credit than is due. There's still a long way to go all around

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Per capita is a terrible measure when it comes to greenhouse gases. That Wikipedia list puts Palau at number one per capita.

It doesn't matter how much each individual person is putting out, it matters how much is being put out in total.

And in that case, these are the top five. None of them, including China, are coming close to doing anywhere near enough:

[–] Deway@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I disagree. Of course more people will pollute more, it's basic math so if a country with 10 millions inhabitants produces 5 times as much greenhouse gases as a country with 1 million inhabitants, the smaller country is the one which should do more. Global warming (and pollution in general) is a global issue, we can't ask people to produce less because they happen to live in a bigger country. The fact that the EU or the US produce more than half the amount of GHG than India or China with not even half their population is insane.

I am not saying China is doing enough, simply that we can't point our finger at them when we all pollute more.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But it's not mostly people who are doing most of the polluting, it's industry. That has nothing to do with population size.

[–] Deway@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A bigger country has more industry. Spain is bigger, has more industry and pollutes more than Portugal for example and it's "normal" (as normal as destroying the environment is). And pretending the end consumer doesn't bare any responsibility is dishonest. I'd also add that most manufacturing done in China is not for Chinese citizens but us, Europeans and Americans.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

China doesn't have to allow that manufacturing.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 3 points 3 months ago

In total, yes. Per capita, they will have to pollute even harder to beat USA.