this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
367 points (95.8% liked)

News

23266 readers
2996 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 276 points 4 months ago (3 children)

This basically eliminates almost all taxes on the rich, burdens middle and lower class with higher prices, and blows up budget deficit.

So much for FiScAL ReSPonSibiLiTY

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

Yeah, are you being fiscally responsible, chump? How much are you making? Jeff over here needs another yacht!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 123 points 4 months ago (4 children)

This freak lost a fucking Casino. The place where people just give you their money. A CASINO!!! He is an idiot and the worst "business man". Con man looking for a new con.

[–] Mikelius@lemmy.world 64 points 4 months ago

Not a casino. Multiple ones. Because the dumb fuck decided the best way to run resorts was to have them compete and under cut each other.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Idiot is an understatement.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, I can't think of a strong enough word, including the one now regarded as a slur.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 102 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (19 children)

Tarrifs on imports?

So basically jacking up prices on all the things made overseas that are cheapest to buy in the US. That affects everyone, especially the poorer people that tend to shop places where that cheap imported stuff is sold because it’s a bigger percentage of their income. It’s gonna affect the middle class the most because they’re probably the biggest consumers. The rich DGAF because well, they’re rich.

Quickest way to put even more people below the poverty line.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 months ago (8 children)

things made overseas that are cheapest to buy in the US

Things that are made overseas because American business owners outsourced the manufacturing jobs to the countries with the cheapest labour (and also the least worker protections)?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 94 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is one of the stupidest things I've ever heard.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago

I'm sure he'll come up with something dumber tomorrow.

[–] Heavybell@lemmy.world 64 points 4 months ago (11 children)

Income tax is such a bitch to deal with. I used to support the idea of replacing it with GST/VAT because then I'd not have to deal with it. But then someone pointed out that disproportionately benefits the rich (who mostly just hold wealth rather than spend it) and disadvantages the poor (who cannot avoid paying for things).

So fuck it. Make it all income tax and get rid of the others! :P

(In before this is also a bad idea somehow)

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 41 points 4 months ago (4 children)

It should be a moderately progressive income tax. That is to say the lowest earning bracket should pay nothing as a percentage of their income, the next bracket should pay a little bit, the next bracket a little higher % of their income, all the way up to billionaires who should be taxed out of billionaire status. I can certainly afford to pay a higher % of my income to taxes than someone who isn't sure where their next meal is coming from, but my bosses and their bosses, and the people who own the building should be paying way more on their income than me. Also we need to get rid of the shenanigans that allows the ultra wealthy to avoid income tax altogether through loans and what not.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

For clarity, say Kalkaline earns 100k a year. Ideally the billionaires would bring home exactly the same on their first 100k as Kalkaline does.

Marginal tax rate means the higher tax brackets only tax you in the money made above a certain amount. And it's the same for the next higher up tax bracket, which doesn't apply to any lower money.

If you're not getting welfare, there is no "next tax bracket" that's going to make you bring home less when earning more. That's not a thing.

If you get a bonus, that might be ~~taxed~~ withheld at 50% because payroll is too lazy to figure out your taxes. You get the remainder back when you file your taxes. (Note this may mean you owe $200 at the end of the year instead of owing $1000. That still counts as you "getting" $800.)

We could put an 80% marginal tax rate on incomes above a billion dollars, and it wouldn't really touch someone who was only bringing home 1,030 million dollars a year.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’d prefer a 70% tax on billionaires, but I’d settle for 50% for anything above 5million. Take Elon for example, the guy makes an estimated $50,000USD per minute. Yes folks, the guy makes more per minute than the average American does in a year.

prove to me that billionaires should exist. Tax them accordingly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone 64 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Jesus Christ, we learned that fixing the economy via tariffs was bad in 1930. Like holy shit, tariffs are nearly universally agree by every field of economics to be shitty for citizens, businesses, and then the country. It makes no one inside want to buy anything but the simple basics, even with the basics now costing much much more.

I am not a "free trade" person, but this is not how you "Make America Great Again". Even Ronald Reagan and Dubya didn't do tariffs as a replacement for other things.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Yes, but Trump has a "relationship with MIT" and a "very good brain" so what would those economists know?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 58 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (12 children)

That's not how anything works. The country exporting to the USA don't field the tariffs expense. The importers do.

He would just be removing taxes for people like himself to the result of a massive deficit and decreased trade.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] ZetaLightning94@lemmy.world 52 points 4 months ago

So become 100% dependent on foreign trade... thats a stupid thing to do when conflict is potentially right around the corner

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 52 points 4 months ago (2 children)

So he's planning to make the poor pay the taxes for the rich.

[–] Bahalex@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

No, poor people already pay for the rich. The rich can afford an accountant to find as many loopholes and deductions as possible. The really rich don’t have an “income” and live of capital gains which is already under taxed.

This is just a hope people remember the “no income tax” part and forget about the “raise import tariffs” part when they’re at the ballot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 47 points 4 months ago (3 children)

More getting other countries to pay for things I see. The hubris I swear.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 59 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Other countries don't pay tariffs, people who buy the products do. So regular people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

He only can get one more term, so I suppose he can promise whatever at this point. It's not like he's got credibility consequences for lack of follow through at this point.

The swing states and their votes are:

https://www.270towin.com/

Nevada (6), Arizona (11), Wisconsin (10), Michigan (15), Pennsylvania (19), and Georgia (16).

He needs 38 electoral votes out of that.

Michigan+Pennsylvania+Wisconsin would do it on their own, and they're all Rust Belt states, so I figure that promising protectionist policy on manufacturing is probably gonna sell well there.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/pennsylvania/

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/wisconsin/

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/michigan/

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)

He only can get one more term

Until the corrupt Supreme Court decides to adopt the "unconstitutional constitutional amendment" doctrine and gets rid of that pesky 22nd amendment.

Moot point though because the old fuck will probably die before a third term is even on the table.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 3volver@lemmy.world 44 points 4 months ago (17 children)

Look at this graph, when you know, then you know. Fuck all this distraction from the actual problem, orange man is a distraction.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_tax_in_the_United_States

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Makes sense that profits went up, since this graph is not inflation adjusted

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 42 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean, the Brownback Experiment nearly broke Kansas, but what if we scaled it up to 50 states?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 42 points 4 months ago

Tax the rich, give the middle and lower class tax breaks. It would fix so much.

[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 37 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Someone did the math and realized we would need a 130% tariff on all goods to replace current income tax revenue.

People’s number one concern is inflation. If that tariff is created we will see 100% inflation over night!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Eat the rich. Tax the motherfuckers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 29 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Trump floats more shit than a sewage treatment plant.

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago

How about we eliminate income taxes and replace it with corporate carbon emissions tax, AND cut fuel subsidies.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Horrible idea from a horrible orange blob.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Epicmulch@lemm.ee 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

See this is the kind of thing that makes zero actual sense but his supporters pretend to believe he can accomplish it or worse they actually believe him.

[–] renrenPDX@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

How much can a banana cost Michael, $1000?

[–] FirstCircle@lemmy.ml 17 points 4 months ago

I swear he comes across as even more senile each and every day. But ...

The rich would support this - they can only consume so much after all, and most of that would be discretionary. No more income taxes on vast incomes, stop buying imported shit, huge win for them. The chowderheads supporting Drumpf would probably be enthusiastic about such an idea too - imagining their small paychecks without that hated tax deduction box and imagining no more paying every year for that scary tax return software. And then, they lose their jobs because countries that we export to retaliate with their own tariffs. Prices on pretty much everything goes through the roof (because even domestic products have foreign supply chains), and most of the cheap shit they used to be able to afford (like electronics from China, bulk foods from overseas and (fast-)foods made with it) they can't afford now.

Meanwhile, with the economy crashing, federal receipts (both tax and tariffs) dry up and it's Government Shutdown time. All working according to the Plan. Grandma and Grandpa lose their incomes and health care and have to move in with unemployed, impoverished JimBob and the wife, which is darn near intolerable what with all the hillbilly kids being home all the time now that the schools have been shut down. Kids that are wailing about being hungry all the time just like the oldsters.

It would be fun to see what carve-outs to the tax/tariff policy they'd have, to try to keep the MIC funded. Borrowing is of course the preferred way to fund it, but nobody's going to be touching the bonds issued by an actively collapsing national government.

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

They'd have to be enforced to be effective.

Who made his gold-painted shoes?

The price of computers and TVs would skyrocket—making the tariffs regressive taxes—though it might also spur repair and re-use.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 15 points 4 months ago

This is the same economic genius that said if the US wanted to default on the national debt, we could and then we could just renegotiate what we owed like some chump who bankrupted their own casino.

[–] card797@champserver.net 15 points 4 months ago

People are so fucking stupid. This man will further ruin the United States. Not even attempting to maintain it.

[–] Melkath@kbin.earth 13 points 4 months ago

And he will do it.

He has to figure out this thing with a boat, a shark, and a battery...

But once he works that one out, China will be paying our taxes.

[–] Delusional@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Jesus Christ. Why is it that republicans think destroying the country will be better than what we currently have? It's so fucking insane.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›