this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
285 points (98.6% liked)

World News

38978 readers
2964 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The United States will send Ukraine another Patriot missile system, two U.S. officials said Tuesday, answering Kyiv’s desperate calls for more air defenses as it battles an intense Russian assault on the northeastern Kharkiv region.

The officials said President Joe Biden has approved the move. It would be the second Patriot system that the U.S. has given to Ukraine, although the Pentagon has routinely provided an undisclosed number of missiles for the system. Other allies, including Germany, also have provided air defense systems as well as munitions for them.

The two U.S. officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the decision has not been publicly announced. The decision was first reported by The New York Times.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy late last month pleaded for additional U.S.-made Patriot systems, arguing that they will help his forces fight the close to 3,000 bombs that he said Russia launches into the country every month.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 57 points 5 months ago (4 children)

For fucks sake can we just, like, given them a dozen or so? And a shitload of CRAMs? For fucks sake. Genuinely this pussy-footing around with the military aid to Ukraine is fucking infuriating and embarrassing.

[–] smokinliver@sopuli.xyz 23 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Afaik the US only has a dozen in operation itself that get shifted around gpobally where they are needed the most. So there dont seem to be too many around.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure we have more than that in just the Metro DC area. We just don’t talk about them as loudly as Russia does about their IADS.

Also, we absolutely should be building more.

[–] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

https://www.globaldefensecorp.com/2023/11/13/u-s-ramps-up-patriot-missile-production-after-ukraine-war-success/

Good news, production was ramped up. Looks like Ukraine also is getting five more straight from the company this year, in addition to more coming from the US and Germany. I think the Netherlands sent one as well.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/11/us/politics/patriot-missiles-ukraine-war.html

US has 14 of them (well soon to be 13 I guess)

By my count, with the three Ukraine has, the two more being given now, five more from the company, should bring them up to 10 batteries by the end of the year?

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

That is good news, although I think it should be double that still.

Thanks for this.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Aegis Ashore Kyiv time. Including TTWCS by pure accident.

[–] bluGill@kbin.run -5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

While having a dozen in operation might be good, we need the ability to produce 100k of them in a month (including all the supply chain for that!). If the world gets into a war between any of NATO (US), Russia, China, India you can bet that missiles will be flying anywhere that is thought to be unprotected and so we need missile defense on all cities so that nothing is unprotected. The we of course changes depending on how is involved.

I said produce 100k in a month, not have them in stock. That is because technology changes. It is likely that when we (again not sure who the we is) needs this technology will have changed and so whatever existing systems we have are obsolete and useless. 100k systems would be enough to protect us (whoever we are) from today's threats, but they may be scrap when war comes.

[–] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

They cost a billion each to manufacture... Only 280 have ever been made...

100k a month would be 100 trillion dollars a year, might be a bit overkill for just one weapon type.

And that's not even getting to all the people needed to staff a battery.

Anyways they did ramp up production, Ukraine is getting five more from the company of the 12 they can now build in a year. Should bring Ukraine up to ten batteries total by the end of the year including the gifted ones from the US and Germany.

https://www.globaldefensecorp.com/2023/11/13/u-s-ramps-up-patriot-missile-production-after-ukraine-war-success/

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I guess because they are very very expensive.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 11 points 5 months ago

No. It's all about politics and "non-escallaction".

The US doesn't want to be seen as fighting this war.

US Vs Russia is a war nobody wants. Unlimited fire power would be easily framed as the US being an active participant.

Then at home Biden has an isolationist opponent framing him as a war-monger.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago

Germany sent 4, while having had a total of 12. The US can do more, if it wants to.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Patriots probably aren't actually an ideal counter to Russian aircraft.

They're the longest-range anti-aircraft SAM the US has, but they're really primarily intended for use against ballistic missiles.

The US really uses the Air Force to counter enemy aircraft.

Warsaw Pact SAMs have longer range.

My understanding is that the Franco-Italian SAMP/T -- which was also intended for dual anti-ballistic-missile use, but hasn't had luck intercepting Russian ballistic missiles -- is probably a better match for picking off aircraft at range. The radar's longer-range. It has a narrower cone, but that's fine for picking off aircraft that you've identified. If you fire one of their Aster missiles, you aren't giving up capability to stop a ballistic missile.

If Ukraine runs out of Patriots, they aren't gonna be able to do anything about Russian ballistic missiles, as that's their only counter to them. Those Russian glide bombs are limited to front line targets. But ballistic missiles can do deep interdiction.

There’s a ton of different Patriot flavors. PAC-2 GEMs are great at smoking aircraft. PAC-3s are great at anti-ballistic, but they’ll also ruin your day if it doesn’t want you flying near it.

Russia loves to brag about the extreme ranges their SAMs can supposedly reach. And sure, they can probably detect and reach as far as they say they do under ideal conditions… but actual combat is anything but ideal conditions. Given how poorly they’ve performed in Ukraine (a combination of the equipment itself, doctrine, and mediocre training), even their most cutting edge SAMs are getting smoked by gulf war vintage ATACMS.

Meanwhile, the US and allied nations tend to keep the specs of our much closer to the chest, and in fact often understate the performance. We’re not in a dick-swinging contest. If it flies, it dies, and both the Patriot system and AEGIS/SM-2/SM-3 naval SAMs (which, by the way, we’ve apparently started strapping to Super Hornets, so that’s neat) are incredibly deadly, effective, and probably a good bit better than the public specs say they are.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Do we really know the true range of the Patriot system? I suspect not.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Prolong the fighting to keep your enimies busy and you shouldn't have to worry.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Such a strategy is deeply immoral, since it forces our ally to slowly grind their forces to a pulp

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It is immoral, but I feel that's what's happening.

You’re not wrong.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States will send Ukraine another Patriot missile system, two U.S. officials said Tuesday, answering Kyiv’s desperate calls for more air defenses as it battles an intense Russian assault on the northeastern Kharkiv region.

Speaking in Madrid, Zelenskyy said Ukraine still urgently needs another seven of the systems to fend off Russian strikes against the power grid and civilian areas, as well as military targets, with devastating glide bombs that wreak wide destruction.

He said Ukraine needs two of the systems to protect Kharkiv, where Russia launched a cross-border offensive on May 10 that still has Ukrainian troops reeling.

“If we had these modern Patriot systems, (Russian) airplanes wouldn’t be able to fly close enough to drop the (glide) bombs on the civilian population and the military,” Zelenskyy told a news conference in the Spanish capital.

The decision comes as defense leaders from the U.S., Europe and other nations prepare for their monthly meeting on Ukraine’s security needs.

Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder told reporters on Monday that Ukraine’s need for air defense will be a topic at the meeting.


The original article contains 373 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 51%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Seeing the autotldr always tells me the comments section is over, but I still always scroll past just to see.