this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
78 points (91.5% liked)

World News

38978 readers
2867 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 23 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The US has enough nuclear weapons as a deterrent already, increasing the arsenal wouldn't help anything.

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 16 points 5 months ago (3 children)

These new weapons come with ChatGPT installed.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Dudes arguing with bombs: finally we're re-entering the sci-fi timeline

[–] BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

Theme tune to Dark Star starts playing.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh god... I'm picturing nuke.ai as a hot new startup now...

[–] swab148@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago

Only $44k for the domain!

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

I said no! Nothing new unless they get rid of their old stuff first.

[–] BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 months ago

But there’s a whole slew of rich people who aren’t profiting from those ones.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

The U.S. needs the ability to destroy the world five times over instead of four or it won't have military supremacy.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Russia continues their nuke threats, Putin just in the last day made another. It is only natural others respond.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Responding in kind to every nuclear threat sounds like a bad idea.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The comments on Friday from Pranay Vaddi, a senior director of the National Security Council, were the most explicit public warning yet that the United States was prepared to shift from simply modernizing its arsenal to expanding it.

Mr. Vaddi, speaking at the annual meeting of the Arms Control Association, a group that advocates limits on nuclear weapons, confirmed what officials have been saying in private conversations and closed congressional testimony for more than a year.

Fifteen years ago, President Barack Obama outlined a vision of moving toward a world without nuclear weapons, and he took steps to reduce their role in American strategy and defenses.

While the nation’s nuclear complexes were improved and made safer, and old weapons were swapped out for more reliable or updated versions, the United States insisted it was only “modernizing” its arsenal, not expanding it.

“Absent a change in the trajectory of the adversary arsenal, we may reach a point in the coming years where an increase from current deployed numbers is required, and we need to be fully prepared to execute if the president makes that decision,” he said.

The failure of Russia and China to engage in meaningful negotiations, Mr. Vaddi said, was “forcing the United States and our close allies and partners to prepare for a world where nuclear competition occurs without numerical constraints.”


The original article contains 969 words, the summary contains 223 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!