this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
1164 points (97.5% liked)

Science Memes

10940 readers
1755 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TechieDamien@lemmy.ml 130 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I like the detail that there alien has 4(10) fingers as opposed to the 10(22) that the human has.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 36 points 5 months ago

Now I get the joke.

Thanks!

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 105 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (9 children)

Can we all use base 12?

It will be a shower of shit for like 50 years but then it will be marginally better for pretty much everyone.

[–] ted@sh.itjust.works 86 points 5 months ago (2 children)

42* years. Centuries are now 84 years. We are living in the 19th century! I rate this idea 12/12.

[–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 29 points 5 months ago (19 children)

50 years? I bet we couldn't even agree on how to write "11" & "12" on such short notice. (See: date format, encoding, etc)

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Well we write 12 like this: 10

It's easy

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Khrux@ttrpg.network 25 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Some people argue that it would be harder to count on your fingers but we could just surgically give everyone more?

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 26 points 5 months ago (6 children)

There are 12 sections on your fingers (excluding your thumb) you then use your thumb to count to 12 on one hand.

Two hands can allow you to count to 24. Which is way higher than 10. Base 12 is better!

[–] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Binary’s the way. 1023 with 10 fingers

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] NafiTheBear@pawb.social 20 points 5 months ago

This would be great. I was researching why we don't have 10 based clocks and then I saw a video about why a 12 and 60 based system is actually much more convenient and now I would love a 'dozen based metric system'

[–] FreeFacts@sopuli.xyz 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Why base 12 though? Base 16 is even better. And base 60 is even better than that!

[–] frezik@midwest.social 25 points 5 months ago (11 children)

Common denominators. You can divide base 12 into half, thirds, fourths, and sixths and still use integers. I find thirds to be particularly useful, so base 16 is out. Base 60 can do it, but that's getting unweildly.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tramdan@sh.itjust.works 90 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There are 10 types of people: Those who understand binary and those who don't.

[–] WolfLink@lemmy.ml 57 points 5 months ago (3 children)

And those who didn’t expect the joke to be in base 3

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 77 points 5 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 56 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I like that the alien has 4 fingers. Fitting!

[–] storcholus@feddit.de 27 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's 10 fingers. Just keep your freaky 11 finger hands of this serious discussion

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 52 points 5 months ago (3 children)

There are only 10 ways of doing things: the right way and the wrong way. (Programming joke)

[–] bi_tux@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

There are actually 00000000000000000000000000000010 ways of doing things (in most languages)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ech@lemm.ee 41 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

Huh, that's a good point. A better universal naming system would be something like "Base x+1", with x being one integer lower than 10. So humans would use Base 9+1, and the alien would use Base 3+1.

*This has been on my mind all day and the more I think about it, the more obvious it becomes how fundamentally terrible the name "Base-10" is. How did this never occur to the people who coined the term? Even the system I suggested is flawed as it's still trying to incorporate the same bad logic.

A better system would be something like Base 9, stopping shy of the respective 10 in each system, or if it needs to be clarified, Base 9+0, as 0 is the extra digit in the first place, not 10.

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

we'd only be able to represent bases for numbers with one digit though because what does base 15+1 mean? the 15 could be in any base higher than 5. the clearest way would probably be to just represent it with lines or something "base ||||||||||"

[–] ech@lemm.ee 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It's only 15 to us because we use base 10 (or 9+1). Like how we have 4 through 9, but that aliens in the picture only count up to 3.

In the case of a mismatch, the culture using the higher base would just translate down (Base 21+1 in the given scenario).

Single units would probably be the simplest method, but also wildly impractical as the base gets higher. You really want to count each digit just to figure out someone uses Base 100?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (12 children)

Base 16 is typically represented with letters being used as the extra numerals, so it would end up being F+1. Problem solved.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cholesterol@lemmy.world 36 points 5 months ago
[–] kelargo@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago (1 children)

All your base belong to us

[–] el_abuelo@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Not to be that guy - just to make sure you nail it perfectly next time - it's "all your base are belong to us"

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Octal is base 8. Decimal is base A. Hexadecimal is base G. Any questions?

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 36 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Jesus Christ.

I just realized that we call binary base2 and there's no 2 in that numbering system. We call hexadecimal base16 but there's no 16 (at least not like we know it). But then why is base10 base10? We have a 10...but it's not a single digit number.

Why is this reminding me of Project Hail Mary?

[–] psud@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Every base has ten, but it's made of two digits

Binary 0, 1, 10 Ternary 0, 1, 2, 10 ... Decimal 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Hex 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, A, B, C, D, E, F, 10

Each has the right count of digits for its base before you go two-digit - binary has two (0, 1), etc

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What is this “8” you refer to? Here in the land of people without thumbs, 10 comes after 7.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Wow I never thought about that.

But it is always like this:

let there be any base "b"
That can represent a number by the sum of their positional digits:

number = sum(d_i * b ^ i)
   where i is the position index and d_i is the digit at this position. (note: index starts with 0, from the least digit farthest to the right)

So the (decimal) number 4 in base 4 is then

1×4¹ + 0×4^0 = 10

And (decimal) number 8 in base 8 is

1×8¹ + 0×8^0 = 10

And 10 in base 10:

1×10¹ + 0×10^0 = 10
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 36 points 5 months ago (1 children)

All your bases belong to 10

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 26 points 5 months ago (2 children)

All your base are belong to 10

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I get this comic which is about translation errors.

Comments are wildly off ....

....BASE!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Only when written, which is the whole point of notation. "Ten" is still a fixed amount, and so is four.

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

"ten" is a fixed amount in base 10. A base 4 user may have an entirely different naming system for numbers above 3, so "ten" (which is written as 22 in base 4) could be twenty two, twoty two, dbgluqboq, or Janet. But similarly to how we don't have a single syllable, dedicated number name for decimal 22 (as in, it's composed of the number names 'twenty' and 'two'), they may not have a single syllable, dedicated number name for decimal 10 (which is '22' in base 4).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] s_s@lemmy.one 17 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Looks like 0100 rocks to me

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] anas@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Took me a moment

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago

This one took me a bit.

[–] shikogo@pawb.social 15 points 5 months ago (3 children)

The most reliable way to communicate bases would probably be using unary. Now if your alien is using unary, that might not work, but it should for all higher bases.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›