this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
49 points (73.3% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6297 readers
47 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
49
(sh.itjust.works)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by AlandoV@sh.itjust.works to c/unpopularopinion@lemmy.world
 

I notice that often (not always) inflammatory comments are written by those who frequent politics related communities.

In addition to being straight up antagonistic, the comments often are about labeling and categorizing everything. Like if someone posted a meme or made a joke. It can't just simply be taken at face value. The commenter is compelled to categorize it, label it, assume there is an underlying agenda. It has to be Russian or Chinese propaganda, it's far-left or far right, its LGBTQ related, it's incel related, it's promoting some agenda somehow.

When I go to check their profile it is very common that the individual frequently comments in politics related communities.

Man, not everything on the planet needs to be politics related. There's not a deep state agenda for everything. Memes and jokes are sometimes dumb and silly and no one is trying to promote anything. There is actually a type of humor called Surreal humor or Absurdist humor which like sarcasm seems like a lot of people just don't get.

Politics really rots people's brains.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 49 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Outrage addiction is real, and politics is an easy source for people to get their fix.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 22 points 6 months ago (2 children)

go to your cities facebook page sometime or god forbid nextdoor. People are fully addicted to being online, and mad. You'll see the same people pop up time and time again, forcing their opinions on things that are completely irrelevant. There can be a picture of a park on a nice day and these people will fly off the handle about liberals or lgbtq or something.

They literally can't help it anymore, it's a dopamine drip for them. They get to feel superior for a split second, then move onto the next post.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 8 points 6 months ago

I think part of it is that and part of it is feeling helpless. All political news is terrible all the time, it's always outrageous and anger inducing especially because there is literally nothing you can do but vote or the much much much harder, borderline impossible, "actually run for office yourself" so a persons only outlet is online.

I think I'm guilty of this, but I try not to be nasty about it.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Anger is an easy emotion.

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 39 points 6 months ago (7 children)

It's important to call out the massive influx of Kremlin and CCP propaganda on social media, and it's all over the place on Lemmy.

[–] mindlight@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. I mean, they're all over social media but holy crap do they own on Lemmy...

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's honestly a real bummer. I'd love to encourage people to use the Fediverse, but I won't even tell people I use it as it is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I mean, the original creators of Lemmy are Communists. Not my opinion; they stated that much themselves. Despite their claim that their team comes from a bunch of political ideologies, lemmy.ml is very pro-Communism, and a breeding ground for pro-Russia/China and anti-Ukraine/America content.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (5 children)

I'm confused, they're pro-communism but Russia isn't communist and it's a stretch to call China a strictly communist, Marxist nation.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I don't know enough about the developers of Lemmy, but in a general sense I know a lot of the pro-Russia/China stances from tankies are simply because they are the biggest anti-West powers. What they do in practice doesn't matter as much as their ability to challenge Western standards.

In essence, it's like people who support certain political candidates for being "accelerationists" or "disruptors" just because they want to see the system burn, and they're narcissistic enough to think their ideology will somehow be the one on top after the collapse.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Ideologues with a very flexible ideology? So just hypocrites really.

Sounds about right.

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There are some real communists there, but it's more of a facade for Kremlin and CCP propaganda.

Fwiw I'm fine with the real communists, it's a noble ideology that at the very least provides an important counterbalance for late stage capitalism. But I hate lemmy.ml and their ilk for supporting the spread of authoritarians.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Same, communism would be a great way to go about things if people weren't involved but they are and the ones that rise to power often absolutely fucking suck.

I don't see much in the way of obvious pro-CCP and pro-Putin propaganda around here though, I see way more posts calling it out. Maybe my instance has blocked the worst offenders, I don't know.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Lemmy.world is defederated from Hexbear and Lemmygrad, which are the two most cited tankie instances. Several other instances are defederated from them as well, though I don't know them all off the top of my head.

There are other instances which remain federated with them, however, and so they may see more posts from those instances as well as potentially dramatically different comment sections with Hexbear/Lemmygrad users who are otherwise invisible to those from instances that defederated from them.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Ah, makes sense. Thanks!

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

obvious

It's not obvious, they know subtlety is required, and the core of most propaganda is truthful.

Something to look for is content that divides the enemies of the Kremlin/CCP (often the same). Digital divide and conquer, fueled by paid shills and LLMs.

Some examples are:

  • Exacerbating conflict, like supporting extreme stances about Israel's genocide, BLM, trucker convoys, EU-UK alliance (Brexit)
  • General support for extremists on both/all sides

They also more directly attack political opponents. They can't constantly say "Putin is great," it's too obvious. But they attack people.

Biden is an obvious example because they want their asset Trump to win, and an interesting example because they're also focusing on Israel and BLM as wedge issues against Biden... the Kremlin really wants Trump to win so they can steal land and control people in eastern Ukraine.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It's not limited to economics. They're pro Russia and anti West. I got banned from a ml community for saying NATO is a defensive pact.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Someone should tell them it's entirely possible to be critical of Western governments without sucking authoritarian dick.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Yeah, it's like saying North Korea is a democracy because their government says it's a democracy.

If someone says Russia or China are communist, you don't need to listen to anything else they're saying. Regardless of.if they're talking about how great or how terrible either of those countries are.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Inb4 deluge

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

And oddly.the angriest ML based folks seem to log in overnight US time.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I block every single user who writes comments like that and nowdays I can pretty much gurantee that when I see a thread about one of these topics I'm not seeing even half of the replies because they're almost exclusively from blocked users.

I'm seeing 3 out of 12 messages in this thread.

[–] blargerer@kbin.social 15 points 6 months ago (3 children)

While there is undeniable truth in what you say, I'd caution to remember that while politics dominating your life may be optional, its not for many. Trans people just trying to exist is seen as political, for instance.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, don't most people comment on politics or news which is mostly politics?

This is also not an unpopular opinion. It's not even an opinion, it's soapboxing.

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Almost none of your unpopular opinions are opinions, or unpopular.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Politics makes people fucking crazy

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Alternatively, crazy makes people fucking political.

Also very true

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I don't think it's an unpopular opinion to hate people politicising everything - politics should stay in politics.
Sometimes you just want to chat stupid shit and get away from all that crap.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

politics should stay in politics.

Sometimes you just want to chat stupid shit and get away from all that crap.

Some folks can't "get away from all that crap" because e.g. they're a minority and their very existence is political.

That means what you wrote is an expression of your privilege, and is therefore itself a political statement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rivvvver@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 3 points 6 months ago

No offence to you, but that doesn't always have to be true. When the going gets serious, of course it has to be political, but one can certainly joke around and have fun without things turning political.

If you can't do literally anything with anyone without it becoming political, even in safe spaces, then the problem isn't who you are, it's that you've got nothing else to talk about but politics.

[–] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

When I go to check their profile it is very common that the individual frequently comments in politics related communities.

Do you check profiles on everyone that posts non-inflammatory comments too?

[–] hoherd@programming.dev 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're basically asking "do you check for red flags on everybody who is not raising red flags?"

In comment threads, I usually only check post history for people I am considering blocking. It makes sense to check post history if people are instigating. If that person is just starting shit everywhere then there's no reason to listen to them, but if they have a history of reasoned discussion then maybe what they say is worth considering. (I realize how ironic this is coming from somebody who has almost no comment history on a new account)

[–] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's fine if you're just trying to avoid whatever you consider 'red flags'.

But your post is drawing a correlation with other post activity and if you want to do that accurately you need a broader sample set.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

Yes, this is the "base rate" fallacy. You may find the "red flags" your looking for, but they may actually be more common among other commenters that you don't examine.

Simply, what is the "base rate" of those red flags on average? You have to examine a random sample of commenters to know that.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He's now going through your profile.

[–] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yep, pretty sure they'll find all the 'red flags' they're looking for.

[–] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I went through their profile so you don’t have to and there was some weird sex shit about horse boners. No need to verify, just trust me bro.

[–] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I always take a stranger's word when it comes to weird sex shit and horse boners.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

To be fair, who but an expert would have a username like that?

load more comments
view more: next ›