• Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is gonna end up like those people who got an implant to be able to see, and when the company went under, they lost support and their eyesight

    • indomara@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s the first thing I said when this was first posted, all those people who had the implants that enabled sight are left with no parts and no support since the company went under.

      There should be laws in place stating these companies will provide support and parts for the entire life of the users. Anything less is criminal.

      • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        68
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Better to mandate open hardware and software standards, so if the company goes under others can make parts or even upgrade the devices.

      • ringwraithfish@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        I would add open plans and open source so that if anything happens with the company another company can come in and pick up support easily.

      • Solivine@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        How do you go about enforcing this when the company goes under? (Almost like healthcare shouldn’t be private lol)

          • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Doesn’t help if no one picks up the ball on manufacturing spare parts. Manufacturing medical devices is really expensive, even more so when you have to do small batches of niche hardware, and requires fairly special manufacturing capabilities so it’s not easily done by anyone.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Is this perhaps a different thing than the one that had 2 patients with basically VR glasses similar to Geordi from Star Trek and the doctor running the research died? IIRC, the company is still around and the patients only lost major support in the fact that the lead researcher, who knew all the ins and outs of the project, died.

    • machinin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      What, Elon Musk publishing a doctored video making extraordinary claims as a marketing tool? I can’t imagine it.

      • ringwraithfish@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        The fact it’s a video game smells of Musk’s touch. Anyone else remember all the tweets he made about Tesla running games on the main monitor?

      • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        TBH you could replace “elon musk” with “company” just as well. Unfortunately this is general behaviour that has been demonstrated more than once by companies wanting to create hype about their product.

      • no banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        And that robot they were gonna release.

        Not the human in a suit, the animatronic one.

  • lorkano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    8 months ago

    What they shown so far does not sound impressive. There is a twitch streamer that uses EEG device ans translates signals to button presses. She has beaten elden ring with that. From “achievement” point of view what they have shown here is not that special

  • Cossty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    8 months ago

    There is no way I am putting proprietary hardware and especially proprietary software into my brain.

    • e8d79@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I agree, but years ago most of us would have said something similar when asked to carry around a device that will track your position everywhere you go. Now we all do that, because smartphones are just so convenient.

      • kratoz29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yep I agree with your agreement, I can totally see the next generations being amazed by viewing short videos without even having the fatigue of holding a phone.

      • Cossty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I use custom degoogled rom and custom DNS server on my phone, so I minimized the tracking to minimum.

        Either way brain chip and phone are a lot different. One you can easily discard, other one you cant. I don’t want to dream coca cola ads at night. What happens when they stop supporting / updating it. There is probably something in their contract, where they can force you back on the operating table to take the chip back, if they don’t like something that you did, or they are running out of money etc.

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      A blind/paralyzed person might feel a bit differently about that. Healthy people getting brain implants for fun is quite far in the future. That is not the intended usecase for Neuralink at this time.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        blind/paralyzed person might feel a bit differently about that.

        Yeah, because they’re forced into that position due to circumstance.

        Which is exactly why able-bodied people should be free to criticise this model and call for open source alternatives.

        To protect people that have been rendered incapable of protecting themselves.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      What if it was open source, like Threads? (☞゚ヮ゚)☞

  • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is fantastic, but I am extremely worried about it being in the control of Elon Musk.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Don’t worry you will only get ads in your sleep, no productivity from yourself will be affected 👍🏻

      • Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Imagine being an early adopter and every time you close your eyes it’s the same fucking ad where Kanye chants: “Elon macht frei” for hours.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    We’ve all been playing Mario Kart with our minds already, using our mind to manipulate those fleshy sticks attached to our shoulders. It’s fuckin amazing.

    The only usefulness this has is to help someone who can’t do that. And the fact that it’s attached to Elon and that all previous test subjects died and that it’s still been put in a human is pretty dystopian.

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      All previous animal test subjects died, including the majority that were euthanized at the end of the test period for dissection and study. There was a super high failure rate but let’s not misrepresent what actually happened.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I mean, it’s at the very edge of what science can do and realistically there’s not that much else you could do except test on relatively highly developed animals. You’d kind of expect that to happen, but I don’t see a viable alternative.

        • xxd@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Working on the bleeding edge of scientific research does not relieve someone of treating animals with ethical consideration. A “move fast and break things” approach might be good for a startup and maybe even for a rocket company, but that approach isn’t okay if “breaking things” includes living, feeling animals.

            • inspxtr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I believe experiments like these should move slower and with more scrutiny. As in more animal testing before moving on to humans, esp. due to the controversies surrounding Neuralink’s last animal experiments.

            • xxd@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              The least they should do is make sure no animal suffers needlessly and no more animals than necessary are used for testing. I don’t have confidence in moral standards, when employees say the number of deaths is higher than needed because of demands of faster research.

              Also there is some research on non-invasive ways to get signals from the brain. Why not try that before testing implants on animals?

              • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Some people think 1 death is too many.

                They did, it’s probably not as good tech, which is why they are looking for better….

            • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago
              1. You can in fact test many of these devices in mice and even zebrafish.

              2. You repeat testing in animals (with modifications) til it is actually safe or you at least understand what the risk is and how to mitigate it to tell the people who are going to trial it.

              • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago
                1. You can in fact test many of these devices in mice and even zebrafish.

                So your solution to animal testing is other animal testing? Strange solution.

                Nothing will ever be risk free, and most of the subjects stayed alive until euthanized to see the results. How else would you get the results?

                • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Yes, but lower order animals. There are creatures with more or less intelligence and therefore more or less capacity of suffering.

                  Euthanasia is fine for an end point but as an implanted device is lifelong such a short time with the implant before sacrifice is not as useful as longer timepoints.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Lol this is funny.

      “Uh, why didn’t he just use his arms??? DUH”

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 months ago

    The same can be achieved with non-implanted BCI. Why get invasive surgery?

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve seen this kind of thing as well as people given an entirely new sense (a sense of direction similar to how birds can sense magnetic north) with just an EEG cap. Why would you need to implant something directly in the brain to do this?

  • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I didn’t know about people, but there is no way I am getting a fucking electronic chip installed in my brain, no matter how cool it might be

    It should only ever be imo used to help the disabled and that too without any involvement of someone like elon

  • GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    It hopefully won’t be an Elon company, but someone is gonna mangle a TON of pigs and monkeys to make this tech ready work.

    Humanity needs to understand what it will take. Even the highest standards of specimen care are still horrific.

      • RedFox@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, I don’t know this, but did we very gently slay a ton of animals learning how to do surgery and heart transplants?

        I’m not a huge fan either, but how do people feel when the procedure saves their mom or kid?

        • Dojan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          If this is for the betterment of humanity, then I suppose the tech and research is all open source and freely available for anyone to peruse? That this patient with electronics implanted in them is free to do as they please to the hardware and software of said electronics?

          • RedFox@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Lol, no way. They’ll basically say they own the software, and you can’t do anything except not get one. They already say you don’t own the OS in your phone 😋

        • deranger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          did we very gently slay a ton of animals learning how to do surgery and heart transplants

          While I can’t say for certain whether or not it’s true for your example, animals are frequently used (to this day) for medical research. I know for a fact sheep are used for burn/smoke inhalation studies and pigs are used for trauma studies at US Army institute for surgical research. They also use rabbits and mice.

          All of them are heavily sedated before experimentation; lots of fentanyl etc. Death comes by way of potassium injection after the data is collected.

          • RedFox@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s hard to see, but I know people who went through the pig trauma program and it was huge. Way more real experience than any training aid ever. Just sucks.

            • deranger@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              This isn’t related to the pig trauma training they provide for medics, but rather to optimize blood product usage in cases of massive blood loss. Similar idea but it’s not for training purposes, strictly research. They’d punch a hole in their spleen (I think), bleed them out, then try different strategies / combinations of blood products and other fluids to see how well it resuscitated the pig. They’d then get killed with an injection of blue juice (KCl solution).

              I said no to animal research and stuck to obtaining the blood products from human volunteers and doing some analysis of blood drawn from patients in the burn ward who were getting treatment, which was another angle of research done there.