this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
17 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

59192 readers
2452 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Because Boeing were on such a good streak already...

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

No worries, it has been towed outside of the environment.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

the front fell off, you say?

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not supposed to do that?

[–] Valthorn@feddit.nu 2 points 9 months ago

Oh it's very unusual!

[–] Augustiner@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Working for Boeings PR department must be absolute madness right now… imagine having to somehow excuse all those fuck ups and every week there is a new one

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Except this one isn't even a Boeing issue - this is a plane Delta has operated since 1992. This is entirely Delta's maintenance's fault. Boeing will still get blamed for it, of course.

[–] Augustiner@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I know, but no one cares who’s responsible at the moment. What people care about is that they read a new article about Boeings planes endangering passengers every 3 days. So while Delta is most likely at fault, Boeing is gonna take the hit to the company image. That’s why I was specifically speaking about the Boeing PR team. Those guys and the crisis managers won’t be able to catch a break for a loooong time.

[–] plaguesandbacon@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

Boeing laid off about 900 QA people back in 2019. Now they are reaping the rewards

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Elsewhere: Airbus Christmas party budget doubles.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Between door bolts missing, virgin airlines missing wing bolts, this nose wheel, etc

It almost feels like some kind of related systemic error in the very thorough maintenance documentation required for aircrafts, or a large scale sabotage of some sort.

[–] iamjackflack@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

How is this Boeings issue? This is a maintenance problem with the airline. Tires get replaced by maintenance staff. That plane isn’t brand new.

[–] Copernican@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I remember watching this PBS Frontline segment on plane maintenance 10 years or so ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sw0b020OFj4

I imagine we still have those problems and the recent news of counterfeit parts entering the market is scary.

Good thing these recent incidents ended up with no serious injuries or death. Perhaps this timing is good in some really weird way as the Supreme Court starts considering powers of regulatory agencies and concerns around government funding to highlight the importance and need for this government role.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Careful. Boeing already tried the “but it’s not our job” excuse on a few major incidences with an executive now locked behind bars after pushing bribes to cover it up . They’d be best backing off on taking an attitude about where to assign blame. They got a lot of red spots that will never come out.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Well, if proper maintenance was done and the part still failed due to a design or quality issue that was improperly QC’d (missed, skipped, etc) then yeah it could be Boeings fault.

They’re getting extra scrutiny right now because of all the incidents recently, and all the anecdotal stories of former employees talking about how a bunch of suits are destroying it from the inside to make a quick buck.

And frankly, they fucking deserve it.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

I feel uncomfortable as a taxpayer having inadvertently supported Boeing and they are literally falling apart.

You think Airbus is gonna expand its capacity to build even more planes?

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Which, as we know, is not supposed to happen.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't it built so that the nose wheel wouldn't fall off?

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That design choice was revolutionary at the time.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I don't know where to put it but here's about MCAS anyway, the cost-cutting system meant to keep Boeing in the game, but also took over flight controls sometimes and nose dived planes straight into the ground, causing hundreds (some say thousands!) of fatalities:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maneuvering_Characteristics_Augmentation_System

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago

If it’s Boeing, I’m not going.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Clickbait. The FAA lists the plane number as N672DL and a quick flight registry check says that plane was made in 1992. This is a maintenance issue with Delta.

[–] Deebster@programming.dev 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The title is "Nose wheel falls off Boeing 757 airliner waiting for takeoff" and that's exactly what happened. That's not clickbait, since it's not deceptive, sensationalized, or otherwise misleading. It's just news.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You say and yet we both know if the headline was "nose wheel falls off Delta jet waiting to take off" it'd be identically accurate but would mean something else entirely