this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
2 points (75.0% liked)

News

23266 readers
2980 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
dezmd@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
Blackbeard@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
2
FCC To End Broadband Discounts For Poor People After Republicans Undermine Program (www.techdirt.com)
submitted 9 months ago by Theprogressivist@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In short Republicans are going to screw over 23 million poor Americans because they don’t want Democrats getting political credit for helping them during an election season. And because our press is generally broken and afraid of calling a duck a duck, this is going to get dressed up as a genuine concern about wasteful spending by a party that’s long been a huge fan of no shortage of wasteful spending.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] centof@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

This article is devoid of real info. It just goes over the bickering of politicians.

The program is not ending yet, It will continue until it runs out of funds. Those who are already enrolled will keep getting benefits until at least April 2024. If (Big if) Congress agrees to provide further funding before then it would be extended. New enrollment for the program is ending February 7. Source: https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/us-news/personal-finance/2024/01/21/65ad1fe4e2704ef0658b4588.html

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Meanwhile Biden wants applause for giving this same discount to one single battleground state...

49 states lose it, one gets to keep it. And moderate Dems want us to congratulate them for it.

It's this kind of strategy that makes "moderate progress" an oxymoron. The result isnt just less progress, it's a slow backslide because gains never outpace setbacks from conservatives.

Moderates might not be the ones breaking shit, but when they're the only other option "not breaking shit" isn't good enough, they need to actually fix shit.

If they can't, maybe that's a sign 30 years of the neoliberal experiment just shows that it doesn't work and we need FDR style Dems again...

[–] FrickAndMortar@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I feel like the current establishment wouldn’t allow an FDR-style candidate to succeed, they’re making too much money from protecting the status quo.

But I’ll still grudgingly support them if Trump is the other option. I’ll vote progressive in my local elections, but as long as we still have a first-to-the-post election process, it’s always the lesser of two evils.

Isn’t it the case that whoever wins this one, they’ll be the oldest president in US history? Gross.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just vote in primaries.

The DNC has to respect the result of primaries.

So many people ignore primaries then complain they only have two choices.

[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago

The DNC has to respect the result of primaries.

I'm guessing you weren't around for the 2016 DNC primaries? There is no legal precedent that the results need to be respected and they have outwardly said as much.

we could have voluntarily decided that, Look, we're gonna go into back rooms like they used to and smoke cigars and pick the candidate that way. That's not the way it was done. But they could have. And that would have also been their right... - DNC attorney Bruce Spiva

DNC lawyers have argued and continue to argue that the Democratic Party doesn't owe anyone a fair process. It has every right to disregard its own rules or interpret its rules how it wants because it is a private organization

source

Bruce Spiva, representing the DNC, made the argument that would eventually carry the day: .... as he explained how the DNC worked, Spiva made a hypothetical argument that the party wasn't really bound by the votes cast in primaries or caucuses. "The party has the freedom of association to decide how it's gonna select its representatives to the convention and to the state party," said Spiva. "Even to define what constitutes evenhandedness and impartiality really would already drag the court well into a political question and a question of how the party runs its own affairs. The party could have favored a candidate. I'll put it that way."

source

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Never fails to amaze me how y'all can tie literally any news to how fucked up Democrats are. Like this article is literally about republicans being fucked up and yet somehow that was a prompt to say democrats are.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Really?

Are you surprised when people criticize the police?

Do you think we should only criticize the criminals, or that it's ok to criticize police when they're not doing enough?

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

As I said elsewhere, they don't really understand that they're actually asking us to be more like Trump voters and vote on the party line without questioning things.

Are you surprised when people criticize the police?

They probably are, and they're probably shocked that after the George Floyd protests that people are upset that Democrats all over the nation are pouring more money into police departments than ever.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No one said anything about the police but you weirdos start assuming

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Epic rebuttal. /s

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No one said a goddamn word about police you stoned ape

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The fact that you don't understand how examples work speaks loudly, friend.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The fact that you think you cram words in someone's mouth and then they actually have to care speaks LoUdLieR

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Wtf are you talking about

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Broadband is infrastructure anyway, and the way we're doing it now, letting telecoms ration it out while we dump heaps of cash into their laps and beg them to expand their network, is screwy as fuck.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh look, the Dems doing more shitty things to the population at large without a single fucking thing pushing back against it.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Are the Dems in the room with you right now?