Police were dispatched toward Smith’s residence but were called off when they learned it was a false alarm and that everyone inside the home was safe.

Special counsel Jack Smith, who is overseeing the prosecution of former President Donald Trump in two federal cases, was the target of an attempted swatting at his Maryland residence on Christmas Day.

According to two law enforcement sources, someone called 911 and said that Smith had shot his wife at the address where Smith lives.

Montgomery County Police dispatched units toward the home but were called off when the Deputy U.S. Marshals protecting Smith and his family told police that it was a false alarm and that everyone inside the home was safe.

No arrests have been made in connection with the incident.

  • MagicShel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    188
    ·
    10 months ago

    No arrests have been made in connection with the incident.

    This shit needs to change. This has been a problem for too many years now.

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      87
      ·
      10 months ago

      For real. Maybe people will take it seriously now that we’ve gone from the swatting live steamers to swatting representatives and elected officials.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah. When I first heard about swatting you heard about arrests. Now it seems like the cops don’t give a shit.

      When I was in school you’d get a bomb threat in the county once a year or so but they always caught them. How are police so inept now?

      • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Because our phone regulations are absolute shit now and thus it’s much easier to hide this shit with everything now.

          • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t answer my phone either. I have a special Ring tone for the family, that’s it. At work I got moved to a new location and asked me if I needed my phone. I said no and haven’t used the office phone since. I email companies and setup in person meetings or teams meetings. There’s no need for a phone at work if one can just do teams.

          • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            29
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s the regulations that don’t exist when we’ve got new technology that needs to be regulated that are the problem. And sorry, I don’t have a list of every telephone regulation on me to go through and tell you which ones, nor the time to do so.

              • cogman@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                32
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                VPNs, virtual numbers, voip, and tor are somewhat new and fairly unregulated. It’s dead simple to setup to make a very hard to trace phone call.

                • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  None of those are traditional phone services, they’re all internet based so regulated differently. I agree they should be regulated as telephone utilities but right now they’re not.

                  • cogman@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    15
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    it’s a minor inconvenience for the US Government

                    Citation needed.

                    Even if I granted the US gov as being all seeing, a major problem is that it requires local PD/prosecutors to get the feds involved.

                    I’m not actually on board with attacking this via phone system regulations, but It is fairly easy to make anonymous phone calls using the techniques I pointed out. To actually fix something like this, you’d need every phone number to be registered in person with a star card and to completely outlaw virtual numbers providers with stiff penalties. But even then, there’s the issue of international numbers and illegally spoofing a number. Those can’t be fixed without revamping the telcos which is really hard with the amount of ossified tech in place.

                    This probably won’t happen in my lifetime, but the two things that need to happen are reducing gun ownership and demilitarization of the police. Cops are way too trigger happy, actual consequences when cops murder or harm individuals would go a long way in stopping them from perceiving everyone as an enemy combatant. Pulling guns off the streets would reduce the justifications of busting down doors with a dozen cops ready to shoot anything that moves.

                  • cogman@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    19
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Oh go on, come up with something instead of just downvoting me. I know it’s hard, actual work even, but you’re never gonna change minds otherwise.

                    Dude, I just responded to you and did not downvote, calm down. Maybe take some of your own advice about anger?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        When I was in school you’d get a bomb threat in the county once a year or so but they always caught them.

        I’m actually surprised about that. Maybe you went to school at a different time from me? I graduated in 1995. A couple of times a year, some kid (probably) would call in a bomb threat so they could get out of a test or whatever and they never got caught. We had a pay phone right outside the school, which didn’t help.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        The cops probably like it because they get to LARP like it’s Call of Duty for a few hours.

    • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      10 months ago

      Can’t have swatting problems if you don’t have swat teams.

      Seriously, there should be a major push for police departments to de-emphasize swat and stop executing no-knock warrants.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      They’ll get whoever did this. The feds don’t take getting messed with lightly

    • NovaPrime@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m down for redirecting their local swat teams to their house unannounced. Give them a taste of their own medicine

    • tacosplease@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not sure it could be considered attempted murder, but harm & death are real risks in a swat raid.

      Not to mention cost and risk to the officers. It should be a very serious crime. Not sure what crime it is though. I wouldn’t be surprised if it were treated the same as filing a false report which would be way too lenient.

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think it’s awful, but how do you suggest making changes? The only thing I can think of is tracking 9-1-1 calls, but doing more of that discourages people from anonymously calling in emergencies, which could lead to more deaths.

      • voracitude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Er… What? You think they can’t or don’t already track 911 calls? How do emergency responders give where you are if you can’t actually talk while on the phone, like if you’re hiding from an intruder in your house?

        Calling in a fictional emergency needs punishment. The alternative is wasting emergency service time with impunity, having them off chasing wild geese while someone with a real emergency is dying.

        Edit: And yes, this is already illegal and has already resulted in arrests in the real world: https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/the-crime-of-swatting-fake-9-1-1-calls-have-real-consequences1

        It just needs to be enforced.

      • seathru@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        911 calls are tracked. Listen to your local police scanner. Even if someone calls and immediately hangs up, they have a pretty good idea where that person was calling from.

        I think @MagicShel meant we should actually use the information we already have, and prosecute it like the attempted murder that it is.

          • seathru@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Encrypted? Or digital? I thought the one here was because all you could hear was what sounded like modem static when someone keyed up. Turns out it was just a digital “encryption” that could be defeated with a $20 baofeng radio.

            There are however a few places that are straight up encrypted with their own keys, and not much you can do about that.

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Last time I called 9-1-1 they confirmed my location, and name without me telling them who, or where I was calling from.

        9-1-1 only cares about getting help to the scene. AND, if being anonymous is an issue for you, use burners.

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        At a minimum tell the responding officers that the call was anonymous and hasn’t been verified. I don’t know beyond that. Remove anonymity but also seal the records automatically to be unsealed only if the call itself is a crime? But we’ve had a long time to deal with this and think about solutions, and it’s hard to believe we’ve not come up with a single way to address the issue.

          • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            It actually could be very hard to find the perpetrator with overseas VPNs and VOIP phone numbers that can be spoofed.

              • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Dude I knew about that stuff before most people in the world, 20 years ago.

                VPNs can still make users anonymous, regardless of all the above. They are not cracking strong encryption in those tunnels, and overseas VPN providers can provide anonymizing VPN services that they won’t be able to trace. There may actually be nothing they can do about it.