As AI developers indiscriminately suck up online content to train their models, artists are seeking ways to fight back.

Data poisoning: how artists are sabotaging AI to take revenge on image generators::As AI developers indiscriminately suck up online content to train their models, artists are seeking ways to fight back.

  • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    10·
    11 months ago

    The ratio of using AI to replace ad art:fraud/plagiarism has to be somewhere around 1:1000.

    “Actual productivity” is a nonsense term when it comes to art. Why is this less “meaningful” than this?

    Without checking the source, can you even tell which one is art for an ad and which isn’t?

    • lad@programming.devEnglish
      6·
      11 months ago

      I would assume the first to be an ad, because most of depicted people look happy

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldEnglish
      718·
      11 months ago

      I’m not sure what’s your point here? Majority of art is drivel. Most art is produced for marketing. Literally. If that can be automated away what are we losing here? McDonald’s logos? Not everything needs to be a career.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldEnglish
          511·
          11 months ago

          Nah. In literally being proven right real time. You can set a reminder or something :)

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.worldEnglish
            66·
            11 months ago

            Not sure how you can be “right” to generally just shit on the concept of art and think it’s better replaced by ai.

            • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldEnglish
              49·
              11 months ago

              Clearly you need to work on your reading comprehension my dude. Maybe use AI to help you out?

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.worldEnglish
                35·
                11 months ago

                Maybe AI can write your shitty dipshit responses for you so you can devote your free time to getting art class taken out of schools or something equally moronic?