• MudMan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I said mastodon.social, whcih is one (very large) instance of the Mastodon service. Those are two different things. It is not obvious and it is confusing, though.

      I ask again if you have a point.

        • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah I know plenty of instances limit them making follows approval only. I also saw this line on a person’s profile: “if you follow me from mastodon.social I won’t approve your requests, migrate to a different instance”.

          I think the main reason is because mastodon.social has a lot of spam (or has had it in the past) though I’m sure that the threads issue and the fact that they want to federate and encourage federation with threads probably isn’t going to help.

        • MudMan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Still waiting on that point, gonna stop engaging until you make one. Writing random sentences is not, in fact, making an argument.

          • sour@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            stated goal is providing decentralized and open platforms

            facebooks instance isn’t decentralized or open

            is contradiction