• MudMan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I said mastodon.social, whcih is one (very large) instance of the Mastodon service. Those are two different things. It is not obvious and it is confusing, though.

    I ask again if you have a point.

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah I know plenty of instances limit them making follows approval only. I also saw this line on a person’s profile: “if you follow me from mastodon.social I won’t approve your requests, migrate to a different instance”.

        I think the main reason is because mastodon.social has a lot of spam (or has had it in the past) though I’m sure that the threads issue and the fact that they want to federate and encourage federation with threads probably isn’t going to help.

      • MudMan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Still waiting on that point, gonna stop engaging until you make one. Writing random sentences is not, in fact, making an argument.

        • sour@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          stated goal is providing decentralized and open platforms

          facebooks instance isn’t decentralized or open

          is contradiction