“As the president of the United States, you have power to change the course of history, and the responsibility to save lives right now,” the staffers wrote.

  • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, you didn’t like, or understand the headline, and that’s the author’s fault. Fair point. It doesn’t make it grammatically incorrect though. Email the writer and let them know, if it means that much to you.

    • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So they were grammatically correct with their intentionally misleading headline. Glad everyone reached a consensus.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because it’s grammatically correct it’s not intentionally misleading. “As” is the keyword. Run has 645 meanings. Just because people interpret a phrase differently doesn’t mean it’s wrong, or malicious.

            • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It leaves out context, intentionally. If this was a fox news headline, I’d say the same thing, and you’d agree.

              • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The context is in the article. It could be argued that it is in the headline too, but some obviously have interpreted it differently.

                Edit: Replace “as” with “while” and maybe you’ll understand.

                  • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’m not trying to be condescending. I’m just incapable of explaining this in a satisfactory way. Those criticizing the headline are not pointing out anything meaningful. The information in the article correlates with the headline. Biden has the ability to endorse a ceasefire, “while” his former staffers are urging him to do so.