• Striker@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I looked at the non Muslim Girl and real Muslim girl and it was a series of pictures featuring women with horses. These pictures were marked with a giant red x. The second half of that video was women in hijabs just staying still, marked with a green tick mark.

    Is the message of that video supposed to be women shouldn’t be allowed ride horses?

    • EsotericEmbryo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      92
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes it is one of the many arbitrary things that that specific religion demonizes. Probably has its roots from way back in the day so that women couldnt effectively run away from the men and get very far. Same reason most Muslim women arent allowed to drive. To this day they still have to have permission to leave and go do things without a man. Edit: lol at the downvotes. Give it a google if you don’t believe me 🤷‍♂️

      • VoxAdActa@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        Probably has its roots from way back in the day so that women couldnt effectively run away from the men and get very far.

        Can’t speak to Muslim culture, but European culture way back in the day didn’t want women riding horses because of sex.

        There are a lot of branches on that tree, but the biggest one is that since horseback was believed to be capable of rupturing the hymen (hymen science has progressed quite a bit since I last looked into it, so I don’t know if that’s actually a thing), it was the same thing as having sex for women. They believed that women got sexual pleasure from it (which, I guess, was a bad thing), that they’d start craving horses as lovers instead of humans, and all sorts of weird shit that only twisted, perpetually horny dudes would think of.

        So the sidesaddle was invented. It allowed women to ride horses while, literally and figuratively, keeping their legs closed.

        Unfortunately, riding sidesaddle is a massive pain in the ass, so that fad didn’t last long. Maybe about fifty years or so of general popularity (because, obviously, you can still get a sidesaddle and learn to ride in it today, if you want, for whatever reason) over the course of all horse-domestication history.

        Of course, like so many things from European history, this primarily applied to rich/noble people. The poor didn’t have the luxury of giving a fuck about most of it.

        • Lumidaub@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          horseback was believed to be capable of rupturing the hymen

          It can do that but that’s only of any interest if you think a piece of skin is important.

          • Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Even crazier is the belief that women would start craving horses as lovers if they kept riding horesback. Like…wut

      • Striker@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        I gave a Google. It’s seen as a taboo thing in many Middle Eastern societies based on a verse from Muhammad which curses the private parts of women who touch saddles. Curiously, this line has been debunked and the Quran literally mentions nothing about women riding horses.

        • Lumidaub@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wait, sorry, I’m trying to understand. It’s “based on a verse from Muhammad” but it’s not in the Quran? Where is the verse then? And why does not being in the Quran invalidate it if it’s by Muhammad?

          • crowbar@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Theres quran and theres hadith, quran is infallible, hadith not so much, this “verse of muhammad” is a hadith, possibly the falsified one

          • ZzyzxRoad@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Either way, it still wouldn’t make much sense for women to not be allowed to drive, but allowed to ride a horse.

      • PsyconicX@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        I haven’t watched the video. Just from the thumbnail I’m seeing a half-naked woman riding a horse. The message is Muslim women should be properly clothed and remain humble rather than seeking attention. If you’re wondering if this also applies to men, it does. “Give it a google if you don’t believe me 🤷‍♂️”

    • Phanatik@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You could write a book on things that women aren’t allowed to do in Islam.

      Except they did write it.

    • fkn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mark them as hate speech when I see them then block their poster. They are basically the mission version of “hegetsus” garbage. (Which I also mark as hate speech)

    • LemmyLefty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is destroying my fantasy of it being a short story about a non Muslim equestrian falling for a Muslim girl who’s afraid of horses.

  • Metal Zealot @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just want YouTube to make an astronomically stupid decision that pushes all their content creators to make their own PeerTube instances…

      • icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⠋⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢁⠈⢻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠈⡀⠭⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠄⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣷⣶⣿⣷⣶⣶⡆⠄⠄⠄⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⢀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠄⠄⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣇⣼⣿⣿⠿⠶⠙⣿⡟⠡⣴⣿⣽⣿⣧⠄⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣾⣿⣿⣟⣭⣾⣿⣷⣶⣶⣴⣶⣿⣿⢄⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⣩⣿⣿⣿⡏⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣹⡋⠘⠷⣦⣀⣠⡶⠁⠈⠁⠄⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣍⠃⣴⣶⡔⠒⠄⣠⢀⠄⠄⠄⡨⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⡘⠿⣷⣿⠿⠟⠃⠄⠄⣠⡇⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠟⠋⢁⣷⣠⠄⠄⠄⠄⣀⣠⣾⡟⠄⠄⠄⠄⠉⠙⠻ ⡿⠟⠋⠁⠄⠄⠄⢸⣿⣿⡯⢓⣴⣾⣿⣿⡟⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄ ⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣿⡟⣷⠄⠹⣿⣿⣿⡿⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄ ATTENTION CITIZEN! 市民请注意! This is the Central Intelligentsia of the Chinese Communist Party. 您的 Internet 浏览器历史记录和活动引起了我们的注意。 YOUR INTERNET ACTIVITY HAS ATTRACTED OUR ATTENTION. 因此,您的个人资料中的 11115 ( -11115 Social Credits) 个社会积分将打折。 DO NOT DO THIS AGAIN! 不要再这样做! If you do not hesitate, more Social Credits ( -11115 Social Credits )will be subtracted from your profile, resulting in the subtraction of ration supplies. (由人民供应部重新分配 CCP) You’ll also be sent into a re-education camp in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Zone. 如果您毫不犹豫,更多的社会信用将从您的个人资料中打折,从而导致口粮供应减少。 您还将被送到新疆维吾尔自治区的再教育营。 为党争光! Glory to the CCP!

  • trslim@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is there a decent alternative to Youtube yet? It would make a killing if it had even a little bit better UX

    • Vub@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sadly no. And we’re not gonna see an alternative any time soon. Noone has the server capacity (or 18 years of community building). The only ones who could maybe build something to match their servers would be other similarly shitty companies anyway. Like Microsoft, Amazon or Facebook.

    • Solaris1789@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The only reason youtube still exists with no viable alternative (for the populace) is the sheer amount of content thats uploaded on the platform and creators already being there as well as the difficulty/cost of sustaining a service that stores and serves video. There are so many platforms that do youtube’s job as well if not much better than it but that will never rival it because youtube simply has all the content and content creators.

      EDIT: imo odysee and peertube are the best alternatives we currently have but they will sadly never make youtube fear a single bit for their market share

    • weepingSomnambulist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      if you’re talking about alternative ui/ux, you could try Piped/Invidious instances. Usually I use piped.kavin.rocks or yewtu.be to visit youtube on desktop browser. It basically youtube without ads and other bloats, also privacy-friendly. Or as other stated, you could try NewPipe or Libretube on smartphone. Keep in mind that all of these alternatives wont provide you google login functionality. These apps only store your search history locally on your device. It takes a bit of time to get used to not get fed by recommendation algorithm and not doing any mindless scrolling

  • RagingHungryPanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The red X is over the horse, but how do I know the horse isn’t a Muslim woman? Horses could have their own practice and it isn’t reasonable to assume they would do as humans do.

    • Synthead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Here’s YouTube in Firefox with some add-ons. I have no shorts, no ads, and use the Dearrow plugin to replace clickbait thumbnails and titles with crowd-sourced thumbnails and titles. I also can turn my screen off or use other apps, and videos in the background will still play.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m honestly over people who don’t want to pay for a service complaining about the amount of ads in the free service.

      Also, premium is good value if you listen to music a lot.