• Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isn’t that the point of limited liability corporations? To move profits into private pockets while keeping liabilities in the corporation?

      • girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s not what they did tho. They did this instead … and lower courts said no.

        J&J is among four major companies that have filed so-called Texas two-step bankruptcies to avoid potentially massive lawsuit exposure. The tactic involves creating a subsidiary to absorb the liabilities and to immediately file for Chapter 11.

        source here

        • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Look up MNK/Mallinkrodt aka SpecGX. Just filed for bankruptcy right after emerging from bankruptcy in order to shed the original agreement of future products in lieu of fines or some such shit. Opioid manufacturer double bankruptcy.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The bankruptcy is a plan in place with counsel representing claimants so they can free up cash reserves and pay them.

      Notably, our appeal recently was joined by counsel representing the vast majority of the talc claimants," he said.

      They don’t have enough cash on hand, so they bankrupt part of the company and sell.

      Everyone should read the article.

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t really trust this website, they seem to be pushing you towards their paid services rather than providing useful news.

    In any case, my understanding is that this is pretty old news. Also, it’s not J&J filing for bankruptcy, but a spin-off subsiduary that they created after the fact and have given all the IP rights to. They’ve lost every step of the way so far because what they’re trying to do is so transparent, they’re trying to shirk liability when at the time it was all theirs and theirs alone.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, it’s not J&J filing for bankruptcy, but a spin-off subsiduary that they created after the fact and have given all the IP rights to.

      General Motors tried this same garbage tactic to get out of paying for their liability with mercury switches. General Motors declared bankruptcy, then created a NEW company called…General Motors. They transferred all the assets from old GM to new GM, and left all the liabilities with old GM. It took years, but a number of states sued and got a settlement.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wish they hadn’t settled on these matters. Sometimes things need to be brought to court - and when the state is involved there’s less of an excuse not to.

  • spyke@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    IANAL but I believe there is significant legal precedent against this. Most notably the recent order preventing Purdue Pharma, and the Sackler family from that very protection.

  • Reality Suit@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Johnson and Johnson is evil. The company shall fail. The market has spoken. Accept the punishment for your crimes Johnson & Johnson.

      • girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As a Canadian I have never understood how your SCOTUS ruled that corps have the same rights as people. It makes no logical sense whatsoever.

        I mean people survived millennia without corps, but corps wouldn’t survive one day without people. Ergo we are top of the pecking order here … or should be anyway.

    • Ænima@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My question is, when this shit passed, why did no one tell those fucks, “ok you’re people too, which means the laws that pertain to a person are now applicable to whatever CEO and board members approved decisions that broke those laws.” As it is right now, those fuckers get their cake and eat it too and it infuriates me to no end.

  • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    But… but… but… bad science.

    (At least according to a lot of suspiciously popular redditors anyways)