Technology

59166 readers

2125 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

572

Court Orders Google (a Monopolist) To Knock It Off With the Monopoly Stuff. (www.eff.org)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Dot@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For the next three years, Google must meet the following criteria:

Allow third-party app stores for Android, and let those app stores distribute all the same apps as are available in Google Play (app developers can opt out of this);

Distribute third-party app stores as apps, so users can switch app stores by downloading a new one from Google Play, in just the same way as they'd install any app;

Allow apps to use any payment processor, not just Google's 30 percent money-printing machine;

Permit app vendors to tell users about other ways to pay for the things they buy in-app;

Permit app vendors to set their own prices.

Google is also prohibited from using its cash to fence out rivals, for example, by:

Offering incentives to app vendors to launch first on Google Play, or to be exclusive to Google Play;

Offering incentives to app vendors to avoid rival app stores;

Offering incentives to hardware makers to pre-install Google Play;

Offering incentives to hardware makers not to install rival app stores.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] laxe@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why for only 3 years? Why not make these changes permanent?

[–] FuryMaker@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Guess their thinking is that Google may not be a monopoly in 3 years, so the rules might not need to apply at that point, or they be reviewed?

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why can’t these rules apply to everyone always?

[–] drake@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago

They should apply to all platforms which have over a certain number of users, for sure. It’s not really a good idea imo to make it universally applicable because then you would end up with a situation where a hobbyist developer is legally required to deal with complying with all that legislation for their homebrew project with half a dozen users.

[–] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, makes no sense - could it be that the poster isn't native speaker and actually meant: "in the next three years", implying that the criteria must be met within that timeframe...

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

... why are you boldly speculating on OP's language status? That's pulled directly from the article

Checked other sources, the restriction is only in place for three years.

[–] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Because I was obviously unaware of the idiocy of the US justice system, and naively gave them the benefit of the doubt.

Under normal circumstances, it'd take Google about 3 years to stall the process of opening.

This will achieve nothing, and it would've been better for US consumers if my bold assumption had been correct.