this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
71 points (94.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

5714 readers
3477 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
71
GenAI Slop (mastodon.social)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by dch82@lemmy.zip to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
 

Text:

Please do not add genAI images to punch up your writing. You might think that it adds a nice little bit of visual pizazz to your content-marketing piece, but what you're actually doing is *making it look like content marketing* rather than a useful resource. To the extent that content marketing is an effective tactic, it is because you build trust with the customer by providing them valuable information. A genAI turd plopped on top of your writing is a signal that it will be worthless slop.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That isn't extremely obvious though, especially with the JPEG compression. If you didn't know to look, you wouldn't have noticed it. No one scrutinizes Jeopardy text.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's super obvious, I caught it immediately just scrolling the thread, I don't even do graphic design or anything. You can just tell if you have ever seen a single episode of Jeopardy in your life.

[–] Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's a lot of things to infer off of just scrolling past a 512×768 JPEG. If the image was in another context and the text had been different, no one would have batted an eye.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Perhaps, but the soft shadows still don't match the text. It's uncanny. An amateur designer would've gotten a better result on Photoshop in less time.

[–] Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I wanna believe you, but the JPEG artifacts on an image that small make it extremely difficult to even notice the distortions you're referring to, especially at a glance. You've made it obvious you're replying in bad faith, so I'm gonna leave it here. Have a good one.