this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
595 points (91.3% liked)

Technology

59166 readers
2122 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 226 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

A more expensive, clunkier product, with a bunch of needless fluff in it.

[–] DampSquid@feddit.uk 122 points 3 months ago

Enshitification 101

[–] fraksken@infosec.pub 29 points 3 months ago

For which they will be able to offer subscriptions in a year or 2.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Now with AI!

I'm not sure why they didn't just call it the chrome cast gen whatever though.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So you could just ask it for anything and it could make it up?

"Google, show 'Ow! My Balls!'"

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how far away we are from AI being able to create video on demand like that?

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think overall it'll never be able to create quality entertainment.

But Ow! My Balls! isn't quality entertainment. I'm sure it can create all kinds of clips of things smashing into groins for ultra low-brow entertainment. Probably today.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Shitposting is one area where I have no issues using AI.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago

Or literally just reuse the Android TV name

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (12 children)

You mean twice the ram (1 gig more than the shield), 4 times the storage (32 gigs), and a better remote (chirping find my remote feature, programmable button, and less shitty volume buttons)?

Yep. Sure sounds worse considering it also supports all the same features of the chromecast 4k and AV1 decoding.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 74 points 3 months ago (10 children)

My Chromecast has no storage and no remote. It's fine.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 37 points 3 months ago

None of which changes the fact that it's more expensive and clunkier, and none of which feels necessary.

[–] variants@possumpat.io 28 points 3 months ago (16 children)

I don't need any of that. I just need a cheap dongle that can run one app

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] moody@lemmings.world 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Most of the appeal of the Chromecast is that it's a dongle you plug in once and never have to see again. It doesn't need high performance and 32 gigs of RAM. It needs to play video. That's its entire purpose. It's controlled by any phone on your wifi, it doesn't need a remote.

For most users, this is an expensive downgrade.

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 5 points 3 months ago

The remote was the biggest upgrade for me on the Ultra though. I always struggled to find my phone and do stuff on it just to watch some YouTube or Netflix videos. And the Kids don't even have a phone and they want to watch on the TV in the livingroom too sometimes. With the remote it's easy for everyone to use it without fiddling with the Phone.

My parents have the one without the remote and they basically never use it because my mom doesn't have a mobile phone and my dad newer has it with him, it's always not charged or in some other room.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

It's controlled by any phone on your wifi, it doesn't need a remote.

Or you can use it's remote and not need to use your phone for absolutely every little thing.

[–] Tanoh@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes! I hadn't seen that highlighted anywhere in articles really, only saw it on the damn Google Store after looking just now.

Seems an all around solid update on the previous device.

[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Just gotta stick FLauncher, SmartTube, Jellyfin, and Stremio on it and it seems solid.

[–] damo_omad@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I changed from FLauncher to Projectivity Launcher a little while ago and definitely recommend it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

And now I can install all those things without worrying about my internal storage filling to capacity!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You can get an Ethernet adapter for the Chromecast

[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, exactly. You needed to buy an extra adapter before. Now you don't.

[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

This TV Streamer costs significantly more than a CCwGTV combined with an adapter.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (12 children)

Regular Chromecast work perfectly as YouTube jukebox.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

It's also twice the price of the Onn 4k Pro (Walmart house brand) that's built on the same chip and has the same features running the stock Google TV experience.

load more comments (5 replies)