this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
932 points (95.7% liked)

linuxmemes

21210 readers
58 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 259 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

    Put your money where your mouth is and open source the Tesla software. Do it. I fuckin' dare ya.

    Edit: we want Falcon 9's landing guidance software too.

    [–] evidences@lemmy.world 99 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Open sourcing the falcon 9 software would almost definitely be a violation of ITAR.... On second thought it would be fun to see him go to prison.

    [–] jelloeater85@lemmy.world 65 points 5 months ago

    Nothing could possibly go wrong open sourcing a ~~missle~~ rocket guidance system...

    [–] gnutard@sh.itjust.works 40 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

    No, not just open, free it entirely. License the code under a GPL license.

    [–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

    It'll probably be MIT... just like the rest of the corps.

    [–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I want a world where anyone can go to space. It the thing I wanna do the most. But I'm not rich and I'm no super smart and I have awful health.

    [–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 45 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I know what you mean, but if it’s any consolation, you are in space.

    [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I want to be in space by myself

    [–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago
    [–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    How do you know you aren’t alone?

    [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Because of all the noisy motherfuckers around me all the time.

    [–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 2 points 5 months ago

    My dog barks at walls and is constantly reminding me of the inevitability of our ultimate demise.

    I’m sure she hears things.

    [–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

    I mean, you right lol

    [–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

    We gotta figure out a better way than strapping ourselves to a continuously exploding bomb and pulling some serious Gs for 8 minutes.

    Wonder how some of those SSTO space plane projects are doing...there was a British one I can't remember. Used hybrid air-breathing scramjets, switching to internal oxidizer once it was going fast and high enough.

    Edit: here is is and I was mistaken it's not a SCRAMjet https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylon_(spacecraft)

    [–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

    Space planes carry along heavy-as-fuck wings, control surfaces and a lot of other bullshit that's only useful inside the atmosphere, and which massively increase fuel consumption for every single maneuver while your space plane is actually where you want it to do stuff - in space. And the only benefit is that the atmosphere helps lift and fuel your vehicle to about 10% of orbital velocity. The other 90% it will have to accelerate just like any other rocket.

    The SpaceX approach is much better: Land and reuse all parts of your rocket, but don't carry them with you further than where they're useful. Rockets leave the atmosphere where wings would work within a few minutes anyway.

    [–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago

    Yeah but...most people's grandparents aren't going to be riding rockets. This isn't sustainable for widespread access to space.

    [–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Do you really want countries like North Korea, Iran and China having access to software that would certainly be used for missile guidance?

    [–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

    Why not. If everyone has it, everyone will be afraid to use it, because they know everyone else has it, but what they don't know is how many have developed a working prototype.

    [–] Zink@programming.dev 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Ehh, mutually assured destruction has worked so far, but there are some crazy assholes out there who might not act rationally.

    [–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

    Yeah, that is true.

    [–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

    Yes like in America gun violence never happens because everyone has guns.

    Hmmm