It’s a toss up between them or the “illegals.” While they do hate trans people, it’s a more convincing argument for people who aren’t complete idiots to say it’s because of an increased demand caused by non-citizens taking resources from patriotic American citizens™
Murdoch and Bozos didn’t offer a $1m-a-day lottery to voters. There’s being a propaganda machine, and then there’s not-vote-buying-by-technicality. Musk is the latter.
Then they came for the feds, who overstep boundaries
Then they came for my processed food and the overzealous pharma companies
The demographic that wants less regulation is welcoming more regulation? What a fascinating example of cognitive dissonance in less than a paragraph.
Compatibility with existing worlds
Sweet! Now I can finally afford the luxury of not shitting my brains out from a morning dose of lactose.
6b. Blame the Democrats for a failing economy in the first 30 days when they get back in office.
A rescheduled court date, probably :/
That’s quite a generous interpretation. If we’re being real about it, it’s going to be another “you assholes” email from Timmy.
Well friend, it’s a good thing you don’t use a Mac, then.
Credit where credit is due, at least scientologists are the better educated of the bunch. Fuck them both, though.
I really should’ve started breeding face-eating leopards. If Trump wins, the demand is going to eclipse the supply for a good few years.
Usually, the people here complaining about democracy are tankies. Sorry, I had you miscategorized.
An unknown and probably pitiful fraction of $336, by the looks of it.
$336 of mechanical royalties going to the publisher, who pays the songwriter
… and China and Russia solved all these problems and more with their not-communist flavors of communism, right?
Shame you only made an account 5 hours ago. I was looking forward to reading some shitpost takes.
Don’t forget snaps! Fuck snaps and snapd. Furthermore, fuck automatically installing the snap when I try to install software through apt.
They definitely pay both sides. It’s a small price for an almost guaranteed increase in profits.
While I’m not the biggest fan of the South Park creators’ political views, I’m more inclined to say that people using South Park to double down on their bigotry is more of a reflection of themselves than the show.
South Park has undoubtedly made some very fucked-up and politically charged episodes in its 20-something year run. For better or worse, it’s their bread and butter to intentionally piss people off by parodying various groups, current events, and American society as a whole. I don’t really get the impression that the show is malicious, though. More so that they’re immaturely edgy and willing to push the boundaries of what is considered acceptable discourse.
I’m not going to claim that the episodes mentioned here were without negative consequences to already-marginalized groups (or even any good), but my opinion is that if someone is going to cherry-pick an episode out of a show known for coming up with absurd and over-the-top shit, they were going to look for something to reaffirm their bigoted perspective regardless of whether it came from South Park or some other exaggerated media like Alex Jones. The problem isn’t so much that there exists fiction that bigots can point at to demonstrate their views, as much as its that they held those views in the first place.
You mean interfering with a fair election process by paying voters to choose a specific candidate is not interference?