Rupert Murdoch has entered the chat.
Rupert Murdoch has entered the chat.
Sounds great right?
What Goldman does, others do.
What happens when everyone reduces their new grad hires by 25%?
The finance industry be shaking in their boots. They know when the machines take over labour, they screwed.
Suicide is more like not turning up to the exam and taking it later.
They’re not people, they’re cancer to society.
Probably a good starting place would be to take the three apps you need most, and just search the web for guides to running them on Linux. That’ll give you an indication of how much work you might/not be in for.
e: also if a guide says “just run this shell script” even chance it’s not just that simple.
Yeah, that’s why it’s the chaotic neutral solution… We would need to organise food, water, comms and energy supplies almost immediately. We’d to have to work together, and that is chaotic.
I think a fun way to protest would be to stop the economy. Just all simultaneously stop working and spending, stay home and spend time with our families.
If they’re games, protondb (.com) will tell you how well you can expect them to run. Other stuff, it’s often a case of search the web or try and see. Wine takes some getting used to, you’ll probably have to get your hands dirty and do a little learning.
We’re just waiting for the environment to correct that problem.
I believe the solution is curated data models with the top members of the applicable field determining validity or a stack overflow model.
I think you’re on the right track here, but will retain the same flaws ultimately this way.
Personally, I believe the models should be open and all interested parties have varying degrees of influence over the accepted truth. That’s going to be a complicated in itself.
By limiting it to “trusted people”, you only have to corrupt enough of them, and eventually you end up with the same shitty problems, but with bots too.
It’s just not ready yet. Vr in general is too awkward, inconvenient and expensive. The stuff that’s available now can be a lot of fun, but it’s a long way from where it needs to be, to “change the world”. And yeah, I wouldn’t want it for free since the acquisition.
Well AI fact, in this use has always been made up of a combination of man’s fact and fiction. Nobody’s been smart enough to make an AI that can reliably separate the two, to my knowledge.
Well I suppose they were right. Windows 10 was the last version of Windows for me. I’m okay with not using what little only works on windows. Unless you need something more niche/specialised, windows isn’t worth the pain.
Ah, so more like self-harm prevention, gotcha.
I guess like any tool, whether it is help or harm depends on the user and usage.
Everyone is. As time and tech progresses, you’re going to find that it becomes increasingly difficult to avoid without going off-grid entirely.
Do you really think corps aren’t going to replace humans with AI, any later than they can profit by doing so? That states aren’t going eventually to do the same?
Interesting take, addiction to the convenience provided by AI driving the need to get more. I suppose at the end of the day it’s probably the same brain chemistry involved. I think that’s what you’re getting at?
I’m any case, this tech is only going to get better, and more commonplace. Take it, or run for the hills.
The best solution to any problem is to go back in time to before the problem was created, sure. That cat’s so far out of the bag, and it’s only going to multiply and evolve.
Mhm, I wonder when we’ll have the resources to build one that can tell the truth from other lies. I suppose you have to learn to crawl before you learn to walk, but these things still having trouble rolling over.
Have you tried writing to them? This helped my partner and I. Tell them how you feel, your worries, what you want and why. Give them as much time as they need to process it and respond.