disposabletentacle

If they mess up and deliver it to the wrong address does that person get to keep it?

With a title like this, it’s kind of disappointing that the answer is just “good infrastructure planning” and not something like “the land is cursed such that all who walk upon it shall rise again forever more.”

Nah, it’s the guy farthest back on the left. It may look small, but that’s just foreshortening/perspective and also because it’s curved.

I still don’t understand where they think that infernal powerlift tube labyrinth/endless nightmare dimension is supposed to fit inside the ship.

There’s a ton of wholesome consensual adult-angled 2D stuff out there. Like a ton. The concept of hentai as all underage rape fantasy is a myth. Plus if I stumble across some unmoderated creepy stuff when I’m browsing new, I can just close it and move on without the burden of knowing I saw a real thing that happened to a real person.

This is why I stick to hentai. No traficking or coercion or questionable consent there, just a bunch of nerds doing what they love.

I knew it. I felt it the second I typed it that there was something wrong with the analogy and someone who knows birds more than me would come along and point it out. I posted the analogy anyway. That’s on me.

you have to specify what genders of nonbinary are/aren’t welcome

“Genders of nonbinary”

My friend, nonbinary is a gender. This is like asking what type of bird a chicken is.

Wait… I thought he listed this game being “modder’s paradise” or something as a selling feature. Bethesda actually made an RPG in 2023 without official mod support right out the gate? How do they expect all their bugs to get patched??

I don’t see anything in this wikipedia article that supports your claim or even suggests it.

Holy shit this is a Kbin glitch? I 100% believed the author of the article was just a huge nerd who had found a way to relate Clarence Thomas to Lutan. It… it seemed reasonable somehow…

We’re talking about AI porn in this thread. I’m not sure why you’re going off on a rant about exhibitionism, or why you’re doing it here in a reply to my comment.

This is a strange question. What do you think sexuality is? And what about your definition precludes fulfillment from an AI partner?

See? This is what I mean.

Yeah, but with the caveat that this will only make the world a better place if society chose to implicitly allow this, and actively chose not to disparage, mock, and exclude those people who want to go this path. Which, based on everything we’ve ever seen about society, is not going to happen.

both a wife and boyfriend

But where is the conflicting detail?

It’s just very hard to find a compromise or “agree to disagree” when the topic of debate is something like should LGBT people be allowed to exist. The days are long past where the right/left divide was all about economic policy – the divide lies along basic human values at this point. You’re going to be hard pressed to find people who can engage with you calmly when you’re defending a party whose primary concerns right now are stripping away civil rights from their least favorite human beings before all else.

It depends on the distance, or how it was expressed. Less than 12 hours, or exact times, probably means just the actual driving time before any stops. Really long spans of time, or when someone says something fuzzy like “a half-day drive,” you can probably assume are accounting for a break or two.

To answer your specific question, if someone said “a 10 hour drive” to me, I would assume they meant 10 actual road hours, before breaks. I would anticipate their actual arrival in an 11 to 12 hour time frame.

I’m calling people out on their bullshit votes.

Okay, I’ve been staying out of this but now I just have to: what kind of extraordinary qualifications do you have to unilaterally decide which votes are valid and which are not? Is it as simple as any vote that disagrees with you is automatically “bullshit”?

Have you considered that people are just downvoting you and moving on because they feel that the flaws in your arguments are apparent enough that they can just click the down arrow without having to type a whole essay about it?

And really, why should anyone have to type out a whole response to justify clicking downvote? What makes your opinions so astronomically important that they deserve everyone’s full intellectual energy or none at all?