dannoffs

joined 1 year ago
[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Its 3.10.0-1160, which means it's CentOS 7.9 that was released at the end of 2020. It was a super old kernel at the time of release though.

RHEL 7 just ended maintenance support a month ago and there's 4 years of ELS before it's completely end of life.

[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Pound sand nerd. The chief operating bigot of hyprland never apologized and chose to rebase their entire wm instead of being normal.

[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You believe his "fuck you guys, wlroots sucks anyway" blog post? In that case I have a wonderful bridge for sale that you might be interested in.

[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net 14 points 3 months ago

The only defense of Vaxry ever presented was that he was a bigot on his own discord and not freedesktop's. He's a shit bag and he can take his i3 for fascists elsewhere.

[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net 37 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Vaxry, the main dev of Hyprland, got banned from all aspects of freedesktop.org for multiple CoC violations.

[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net 43 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Imagine having to rebase your entire project because you're a piece of shit.

[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

According to OP's definition:

Woody ✅

Secondary growth (feathers) ✅

Not a monocot ✅

[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net 7 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Fuck it, birds are trees.

[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net 7 points 3 months ago (4 children)

There's no way you actually read that.

It's literally a blog post of one person's opinion which concludes without a definitive statement, that it's not settled if they're trees or not, and then links to a page "for further reading" that categorizes them under trees.

[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C3&q=coconut+tree

Someone should tell the authors of these hundreds of papers then.

You do realize the qualifiers you edited in are exactly my point and directly contradict your post, right?

[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net 40 points 3 months ago (11 children)

This is a reminder that there is no universally accepted botanical definition of tree. It is also a reminder that usage supersedes definition, so pointing out that coconut palm trees aren't "trees" makes you both annoying and wrong.

view more: next ›