bigkahuna1986

joined 1 year ago
[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Careful it can also progress into Stage 4 BSD.

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago

There was a whole scene in Star Trek 4 with the same premise and I think that released in 86.

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Anything to not install Linux right?

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 weeks ago

Nonsense, our oligarchs are One of the Good Ones™

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 37 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

My local store already has Christmas decorations out. I freaking hate it so much

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 weeks ago

That's how you get a Redbox smashed into a million pieces all over your parking lot.

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 51 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Imagine standing around during guard duty and Darth Vader calls up saying if you have time to lean you have time to clean.

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 month ago

We're talking about Unix so being as pedantic as possible is actually required.

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Speaking both seems like a great choice.

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

AITA for beating my wife to death because she burnt my steak?

NTA, cooking a steak is basic knowledge and you told her not to burn it

  • Reddit, probably.
[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Unauthenticed RCE vs all GNU/Linux systems

So this would probably be SSH related right? Otherwise what would all Linux systems have in common?

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

Creo que puedes cambiar eso en la configuración de idioma.

 

Interestingly the release notes include this section:

fusee no longer supports applying IPS patches to KIPs.

Followed up by:

The IPS subsystem was originally designed to make nogc patches work for FS, but these are now internal, and it appears the literal only kip patches that exist are for piracy.

Does this indicate Atmosphere is going to become more hostile for any form of piracy?

18
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml to c/sysadmin@lemmy.ml
 

Not sure if this is the right place.

The last few days I've been experiencing a few issues resolving DNS on my home network. Strangely, rebooting the router seemed to fix it for a time. After running into the issue again I decided to investigate further. I'm using a Mikrotik router with my PC wired in with ethernet cable. The router is using DoH to Quad9 (https://dns.quad9.net/dns-query as per their documentation). I've also imported root certificates for validation.

As of right now, my desktop cannot resolve dns against 9.9.9.9, however it can resolve dns against 1.1.1.1 and 8.8.8.8.

$ dig @9.9.9.9 reddit.com

;; communications error to 9.9.9.9#53: timed out

Interestingly also cannot curl the DoH URL (also a timeout). I thought maybe Quad9 is having issues so I jumped over to my EC2 instance, and I can dig/curl just fine.

I also turned on debug logging on the router, the logs indicate the same issue my desktop is having (timeout errors, sometimes and SSL handshake error).

My question to you all is, have I missed something in my testing/setup, or is Comcast blocking Quad9?

Additional info:

The mikrotik is the latest firmware (6.49.10). I can switch to CloudFlare DoH on the router and it works fine. I can remove the DoH setting entirely and it works. I've got 8.8.8.8 as a static DNS server and the 2 comcast dns servers are dynamic (75.75.75.75 and 75.75.76.76). NTP is setup and the router has the correct date/time/timezone.

As of this writing rebooting the router is no longer temporarily fixing the problem.

Edit:

Thanks u/melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone !

Per their post the status page shows issues in my area: https://uptime.quad9.net/

view more: next ›