Ubuntu is fine. Pop!_OS if you're set on Flatpaks instead of Snaps.
Eh, X11 Forwarding, VNC, SSH, XRDP, Waypipe whatever, it's all very similar
Wow, this is actually fairly technical unlike うぶんちゅ. SSH and X11 forwarding in the first chapter. By chapter 4 we're already exiting Vim.
Now that's a find! I've been looking for something similar to read after うぶんちゅ!
You can get the manga officially from here in its original form: https://www.aerialline.com/comics/ubunchu/
It's licensed under CC-BY NC 3.0 and the author includes the original photoshop files if you want to edit them.
It's pretty funny. I own a physical copy.
I didn't say they were. Hence the second link.
That was my first thought upon finding it. It's really hard to find though, even if you know the name of it.
For checksums: https://github.com/flathub/flathub/issues/1498#issuecomment-649098123
Flatpak does verify the integrity of files as it is downloading/installing them. For ostree remotes this is done using GPG signatures (which are better than mere checksums). If you want to see the commit ID (which is like a checksum) for something on flathub use e.g. flatpak remote-info -c flathub org.gnome.Builder and for the local copy flatpak info -c org.gnome.Builder. For OCI remotes we at least check SHA256 sums and there might be more integrity verification mechanisms I'm unaware of.
But for signatures: https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak-builder/issues/435
This has an empty ffmpeg folder but no binary
That's strange. I downloaded it just now and converted a video. It's not in /app/bin
but in /usr/bin
instead. I know for a fact it relies on the ffmpeg binary inside the code. You can even access it using flatpak run --command=ffmpeg org.gnome.gitlab.YaLTeR.VideoTrimmer
.
The Arch repos are too small.
Eh, I've never felt that way. Even on my Arch system, I only have 15 packages from the AUR and 2134 packages installed from the repositories. But it's probably smaller than you're used to if you're coming from Debian or Fedora.
Many projects use libffmpeg.so dont know if that could be used too.
That library is designed for development as far as I'm aware. I noped out very quickly when looking at the documentation for using ffmpeg libraries :) I think that's why VideoTrimmer relies on the binary instead of the library too.
With the COPR I know who to trust, unlike the AUR, even though I now also setup yay.
I take a different view: I don't trust anybody, but I read the PKGBUILDs and understand them. They're often not complicated. I don't particularly like the AUR much anymore though for this reason.
Everything nearly separated from my OS using the different distrobox homedirs which work flawlessly.
I did try this for a while but I couldn't get used to it. And programs can bypass it anyway with /home/$USER
if they're feeling vindictive, though I haven't run into any yet. It'd definitely be nice to have more complete isolation one day.
Also distrobox upgrade --all works awesome its just a wrapper but really valuable.
100% yes. Be nice to have that in Toolbox one day.
But unverified Flatpaks may be way better than distro packages. At least it is very transparent on Github (yeah, sucks) unlike strange distro build systems.
I'm with you there. I can understand PKGBUILDs but everything else is just far too complex for me. Or unfamiliar. The docs for packaging Fedora RPMs is scary as hell.
What, GNU utils? What makes it special, apart from apt? They have nala so that is dealt with.
To be honest, it's mostly apt
. I really hate apt
. I am also not very familiar with how the system is configured. It's very different from Arch, anyway. I can just never feel at home on an Ubuntu system even in a container, but I do run it on servers.
I've downgraded my "hate" to "it's fiiine".
Yeah this will be crazy. dnf has a lot more commands for querying etc, that will be useful.
It also sounded like they would reinvent the wheel a bit? Dont know
I really have no idea what to expect. But if I never need to use rpm
for querying or whatever again I'll be happy.
Never heard of that, I hope accessibility on Wayland improves.
Here's a recent article: https://blogs.gnome.org/a11y/2024/06/18/update-on-newton-the-wayland-native-accessibility-project/
So do I.
Neal Gompa mentioned that Flatpaks dont have the permission holes to allow screen readers? Thats crazy and may be possible to fix with a global override.
I think GNOME is working on a portal for that. After the Newton stack is in a good state.
Same here. I think it would be nice to create 2 or so base images on an individual host like Codeberg, but I am completely new to all that container stuff.
Codeberg is probably a good host for that.
Currently doing a bit of work, upstreaming some secureblue things (btw the admin blocked be because they… dont like annoying questions?).
Lol. How strange.
Matrix is also horrible for Dev work. People dont use threads so they just spam stuff in a single chat and it just bad…
I don't much like Discord either. Issue tracker is the right place for this sort of discussion in my opinion. Or Sourcehut's mailing lists are fine too.
Also, these change processes are damn slow, but hey, thats fine I guess?
I guess that's kind of the point :)
I want to start doing some videos, no idea why OBS just has h264 hardware? I mean it doesnt matter but why no VP9? AV1 will come in 30.1 you know when that is stable?
I'm usually converting other people's media, so I don't have much experience with OBS. But as for VP9, the industry was gun-shy about it because MPEG-LA threatened to sue Google over patent infringement for it. Essentially the same sort of deal with Sisvel and AV1, except MPEG-LA never followed through on it. Hardware encoding for VP9 has apparently never taken off, but hardware decoding is all around.
Do you know what flatpaks (that are not VLC) have ffmpeg as a binary included?
There's: https://flathub.org/apps/org.gnome.gitlab.YaLTeR.VideoTrimmer
Browser benchmarking
Honestly, as long as I don't notice it, it doesn't bother me. I only noticed Flatpak Nautilus' launch time because it was instant.
Toolbox: Is it considerably faster?
I think so. It at least seems more reliable. I got a bunch of weird bugs with Distrobox in the beginning but I guess I was pushing it pretty far.
I need to start learning some real language as my bash scripts start getting a pain.
I kind of hate Python but it's at least more pleasant than Bash. I've no experience with Go, but it's probably nice to write.
Well I hope you use an Ubuntu container because I bet these packages are also not “verified” on Arch ;)
Ah, well, I use Arch for all my other computers so I feel like I'm already trusting Arch's devs for all my packages. What's one more?
I use 90% verified
I make an exception for Anki and MakeMKV.
You could use Debian Testing which is rolling afaik.
I kind of hate Debian and Ubuntu's userpsace :) It's okay on servers.
Does Arch have Rstudio stuff?
It has it in the AUR, but not as an official package. In most cases the AUR is just as good anyway.
Or maybe dnf5 could solve this?
DNF5 will definitely shake things up. Because rpm-ostree
is going away to be replaced by dnf
again.
I don't. I just like Linux.