I predicted you wanted to multiply your answer by 1.2x. No need to thank me!!

Good, AI is the trojan horse to copyright.

Lmao liberals downvoting you for daring to think sums up the 2024 election pretty good

People keep saying this, but misunderstand why people didn’t vote for Harris over Gaza.

It doesn’t matter if Trump is worse. People don’t want the Democrats to think this behavior is OK.

Nah they wouldn’t shut up about him til the point it got numb. Maybe they should have focused on Kamala instead.

I would assume the answer to your question is “this data sucks”

Roleplayers be like

Step 2 is support third parties

No, but I’m still disgusted by the amount of gaslighting we got for the last 8 months. All Harris had to do was make a plan to end the war, but she… didn’t. And some liberals want to call it our (people who didn’t vote for her) fault.

Go ahead then. Explain the difference without making shit up.

Task: Failed

Y’all really gonna come up with every excuse for the DNC being garbage?

What does your escape plan look like?

Edit: lmao people LARPing

No, it means that your name may be read out loud

Yes, the Democratic party is out of touch. They lost due to stubbornness - expecting Muslims to vote for Kamala without her making a plan to end the war in Gaza was a gamble that didn’t pay off.

Now that the election is over, we need to focus our attention on third parties.

Context?

PSA: You can sign the petition even if you’re not a European national. I registered and signed as a Canadian myself and it accepted it

People outside the US have always been terrified of what the US president might do. Imagine if China had military bases all over the world.

It’s a bit late, but pay attention anytime says they “want x” throughout the year. Literally take a note of it on your phone, and buy it for them.

I tend to only buy 2-3 presents a year, but they’re always bangers, because they’re always something someone got excited over before, them promptly forgot existed… until I had it to them!

I mean becoming an authoritarian government to prevent an authoritarian government doesn’t really make sense

The key word is protected.

Note: I’m an ex-longterm Wikipedia editor and was the 2nd highest rank you can get without being employed by Wikimedia

First, the article won’t be updated to reflect current events. It will be kept a few days behind to make sure things settle a bit more. When people start breaking this rule, they’ll set it so that only logged in accounts with at least 10 edits can make changes.

When this starts to degrade, they’ll set it so only Extended Protected Editors can edit the page. These people mostly know how to behave; anything they add will require a reliable source (a well defined term: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources) and any edit wars will be handled in the discussion section of the page. You would be surprised how smoothly these things can go- at this point, everyone knows the ins and outs of Wikipedia rules.

But, sometimes that’s not enough. They may either delete the page and give up, or fully lock down the page so only administrators can edit it. I’ve never actually seen administrators edit war eachother, but I know it happens. Generally at that point you only have people with 10+ years editing experience chiming in (as anyone else would make a fool of themselves by not knowing Policy 18 of some random WP:LINK).

This is all off memory since I stopped editing like 6 years ago, but high profile editors will spend a long time monitoring this page. The Wikipedia rabbit hole is one of the deepest places in the internet.