• BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    I justified asking for studies. At no point did I claim to have spent hours searching pubmed. How hard is that to comprehend?

    Have you ever tried searching pubmed and vetting studies by reading abstracts? It’s not like using google and clicking on the first result.

    First off, searching for studies backing up some claims will always introduce confirmation bias. Secondly finding relevant studies, vetting the search results, by reading the abstracts, validating the scope of the study, deciphering the methods used, etc, will easily take the same number of hours as OP would spend in minutes to copy paste from their bibliography system.

    • festnt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      if you don’t expect yourself to give any sources to your claims, why the hell are you expecting others to give sources to their claims?

        • festnt@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          oh sorry i thought you were someone else, but still, you seem to be siding with someone who didn’t show any proof of their points.

      • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        I think you are confusing people. DanishGuy is not the OP. They are a third person asking for the person debating the OP to back up their claims. It confused me too.

        • festnt@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          yes i got confused between danishguy and someone else because he seemed to have the same points as the other guy. thanks for telling me, as i don’t think i wouldve noticed alone.