• ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    As we learned from the American Civil War, the southern states were incapable of seceding. However this isn’t the question at hand. The above user asked this:

    What’s the process like?

    There is no such process.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The outcome of a war 160 years ago has utterly no relation to how a decision to secede would play out today. I use the word “process” in place of “whatever sequence of actions” might occur if states were to assert their intent to separate from the country. “Secession” might not even be an appropriate term - a resolution could be introduced, through all the correct and proper channels, for the United States to dissolve in an organized fashion, as the Soviet Union did in 1991. There’s really no point saying any political proposal “can’t” happen.

      • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        My point is the North employed violence in the form of a successful military campaign to maintain the Union. Where the North failed was following up with a re-education campaign to squash southern propaganda, such as the myth of the Lost Cause.

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      There is no such process.

      There is, it worked once and failed once in our history

      Step 1: Declare independence from the other government

      Step 2: don’t lose the war

      Step 2 is the hard part, admittedly

      • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        33 minutes ago

        I think California would need to change a few gun laws before trying to go to war against the ret of the US.